Adler, N.J.
(1984) `Understanding the Ways of Understanding: Cross-cultural Methodology Reviewed', in R.N Farmer (ed.) Advances in International Comparative Management, Vol. 1, pp. 31-67. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Boyacigiller, N.
and N.J. Adler (1991) `The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in Global Context', Academy of Management Review16(2): 262-90.
3.
Brannen, M.Y.
(1996) `Ethnographic International Management Research ', in B.J. Punnett and O. Shenkar (eds) Handbook of International Management Research, pp. 115-43. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Buckley, P.J.
and M. Chapman (1997) `The Use of Native Categories in Management Research ', British Journal of Management8: 283-99.
5.
Chapman, M.
(1997) `Social Anthropology, Business Studies, and Cultural Issues', International Studies of Management and Organization26(4): 3-29.
6.
Clifford, J.
and G.E. Marcus (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Geertz, C.
(1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays . New York: Basic Books.
8.
Harris, S.
(2000) `Reconciling Positive and Interpretative International Management Research: A Native Category Approach', International Business Review9: 755-70.
9.
Hofstede, G.
(1983) `The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories', Journal of International Business Studies14: 75-89.
10.
Jack, G.
and R. Westwood (2006) `Postcolonialism and the Politics of Qualitative Research in International Business', Management International Review46(4): 481-501.
11.
Marschan-Piekkari, R.
and C. Welch (eds) (2004) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
12.
Peterson, R.B.
(2004) `Empirical Research in International Management: A Critique and Future Agenda', in R. Marschan-Piekkari and C. Welch (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, pp. 25-55. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13.
Prasad, A.
(2003) Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement. New York: Palgrave.
14.
Prasad, A.
and P. Prasad (2002) `The Coming of Age of Interpretive Organizational Research', Organizational Research Methods5(1): 4-11.
15.
Punnett, B.J.
and O. Shenkar (eds) (1996) Handbook of International Management Research. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sharpe, D.R.
(2004) `The Relevance of Ethnography for International Business Research', in R. Marschan-Piekkari and C. Welch (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, pp. 306-23. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18.
Silverman, D.
(1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
19.
Thomas, A.S.
, O. Shenkar and L. Clarke (1994) `The Globalization of Our Mental Maps: Evaluating the Geographic Scope of JIBS Coverage', Journal of International Business Studies25(4): 675-87.
20.
Usunier, J.-C.
(1998) International & Cross-Cultural Management Research . London: Sage.
21.
Westwood, R.I.
(2001) `Appropriating the Other in the Discourses of Comparative Management', in R.I. Westwood and S. Linstead (eds) The Language of Organization , pp. 241-62. London: Sage.
22.
Westwood, R.I.
(2004) `Towards a Post-Colonial Research Paradigm in International Business and Comparative Management', in R. Marschan-Piekkari and C. Welch (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business , pp. 56-83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
Wright, R.W.
and D.A. Ricks (1994) `Trends in International Business Research: Twenty-Five Years Later', Journal of International Business Studies25(4): 687-701.