To advance sustainable development, it is essential to understand how technological entrepreneurship shapes not only the pace but also the quality of economic growth. Accordingly, this study examines its multidimensional effects on growth quality. By combining indicators from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor with a composite index of growth quality (TOPSIS method), and using data from 49 countries (2005–2018), the study highlights a significant regional heterogeneity in the effect of entrepreneurship. The adoption of technologies appears as a driver of growth-quality, promoting efficiency, and sustainability but potentially deteriorating short-term stability due to creative destruction. Granger causality tests often suggest that the improvement in the quality of growth, especially stability, precedes the development of technological entrepreneurship. The central role of institutional quality and macroeconomic stability is emphasized, implying that innovative economies must strengthen their entrepreneurial ecosystem, while less advanced economies must first consolidate their institutions.
AborJYDwumfourRAAgbloyorEK, et al. (2024) Foreign direct investment and inclusive finance: Do financial markets and quality of institutions matter?Empirical Economics67(2): 773–815.
2.
AcemogluDAkcigitUCelikMA (2022) Radical and incremental innovation: The roles of firms, managers, and innovators. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics14(3): 199–249.
3.
AcemogluDJohnsonSRobinsonJA (2005) Chapter 6 institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier, pp.385–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01006-3.
4.
AcsZJStamEAudretschDB, et al. (2017) The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics49(1): 1–10.
5.
AghionPAkcigitUHowittP (2015) The Schumpeterian growth paradigm. Annual Review of Economics7(1): 557–575.
6.
AghionPHowittP (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica60(2): 323.
7.
AghionPJaravelX (2015) Knowledge spillovers, innovation and growth. The Economic Journal125(583): 533–573.
8.
Aguilar-BarcelóJGHiguera-CotaF (2019) Challenges in innovation management for Latin America and the Caribbean: An efficiency analysis. CEPAL Review (127): 7–23. 10.18356/f1eff3e0-en.
9.
AlamMZKousarSUllahMR, et al. (2022) How creative destruction functions in corporate entrepreneurial process: an empirical investigation of Schumpeterian concept in engineering firm settings in Pakistan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship11(1). 10.1186/s13731-022-00199-3.
10.
AljarallahRAAngusA (2020) Dilemma of Natural resource abundance: A case study of Kuwait. SAGE Open10(1). 10.1177/2158244019899701.
11.
AlvarezCLopezTUrbanoD (2025) Do institutional dimensions matter at different stages of the entrepreneurial process? A multi-country study. Small Business Economics64(2): 353–381.
ArgyresNMahoneyJTNickersonJ (2018) Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Strategic Management Journal40(3): 357–376.
14.
AshourMMYongCCCheongKC (2024) Evaluation of Dutch disease effect on oil-exporting countries: An empirical estimation. OPEC Energy Review48(4): 229–245.
15.
AudretschDBBelitskiMCaiazzaR (2021) Start-ups, innovation and knowledge spillovers. The Journal of Technology Transfer46(6): 1995–2016.
16.
AudretschDBKeilbachM (2004) Does entrepreneurship capital matter?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(5): 419–430.
17.
AudretschDBLehmannEE (2025) A knowledge spillover narrative theory of entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer51(1): 226–242.
18.
AutioEKenneyMMustarP, et al. (2014) Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy43(7): 1097–1108.
19.
Avila-LopezLALyuCLopez-LeyvaS (2019) Innovation and growth: Evidence from Latin American countries. Journal of Applied Economics22(1): 287–303.
BakhoucheA (2021) Assessing the innovation-finance Nexus for SMEs: Evidence from the Arab region (MENA). Journal of the Knowledge Economy13(3): 1875–1895.
22.
BaltagiBHFengQKaoC (2012) A Lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Journal of Econometrics170(1): 164–177.
23.
BansalSSinghSNangiaP (2022) Assessing the role of natural resource utilization in attaining select sustainable development goals in the era of digitalization. Resources Policy79: 103040.
24.
BaptistaRSwannP (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more?Research Policy27(5): 525–540.
25.
BashirHA (2016) The role of innovative entrepreneurship in economic development : A study of G20 countries. Management Studies and Economic Systems3(2): 91–100.
26.
BaumolWJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy98(5, Part 1): 893–921.
27.
BeckerBRoperSVaninoE (2023) Assessing innovation spillovers from publicly funded R&D and innovation support: Evidence from the UK. Technovation128: 102860.
28.
BettiolMCapestroMDi MariaE, et al. (2023) Is this time different? How Industry 4.0 affects firms’ labor productivity. Small Business Economics62(4): 1449–1467.
29.
BloomNJonesCIVan ReenenJ, et al. (2020) Are ideas getting harder to find?American Economic Review110(4): 1104–1144.
BorenszteinEDe GregorioJLeeJ (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?Journal of International Economics45(1): 115–135.
32.
BounckenRBKrausS (2021) Entrepreneurial ecosystems in an interconnected world: Emergence, governance and digitalization. Review of Managerial Science16(1): 1–14.
33.
BreuschTSPaganAR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies47(1): 239.
34.
BrockWATaylorMS (2004) Economic growth and the environment : a review of theory and empirics.
35.
BrutonGDRubanikY (1997) High technology entrepreneurship in transitional economies: The Russian experience. The Journal of High Technology Management Research8(2): 213–223.
36.
ByersTHDorfRCNelsonAJ (2018) Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
37.
CaggeseA (2019) Financing constraints, radical versus incremental innovation, and aggregate productivity. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics11(2): 275–309.
38.
CasadellaVTahiS (2025) Inclusive national innovation systems: Rethinking institutions in the light of inclusion imperatives. Journal of Institutional Economics21. 10.1017/s1744137425000025.
39.
CasperSMiozzoMStorzC (2023) The emergence of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: The interplay between early entrepreneurial activity and public policy in the Korean online gaming industry. Industry and Innovation31(3): 280–310.
40.
CavalloAGhezziABaloccoR (2018) Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal15(4): 1291–1321.
41.
ChahdouraAKhefachaIMrabetN (2025) Unraveling the relationship between entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable development: The mediating role of innovation in a macroeconomic panel data study. International Review of Applied Economics: 1–27. 10.1080/02692171.2025.2568372.
42.
ChebliMSaidiK (2024) Economic growth in middle-income countries: The role of political stability and Foreign direct investment. Journal of Quantitative Economics22(3): 641–665.
43.
ChenYJiangHLiangY, et al. (2022) The impact of Foreign direct investment on innovation: Evidence from patent filings and citations in China. Journal of Comparative Economics50(4): 917–945.
44.
CiaffiGDeleidiMDi BucchianicoS (2024) Stagnation despite ongoing innovation: Is R&D expenditure composition a missing link? An empirical analysis for the US (1948–2019). Technological Forecasting and Social Change206: 123575.
45.
CoadASegarraATeruelM (2015) Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role?Research Policy45(2): 387–400.
46.
CobbyR (2020) The art of economic catch-up. Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in innovation systems. Eurasian Geography and Economics: 1–3. 10.1080/15387216.2020.1747514.
47.
DiakodimitriouDTsioutsiosAPapageorgiouT (2025) Education expenditures and growth: Is R&D the link?Journal of Policy Modeling47(2): 322–337.
48.
DavidPA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review75(2): 332–337.
49.
DekaA (2024) The role of natural resources rent, trade openness and technological innovations on environmental sustainability—evidence from resource-rich African nations. Resources Policy98: 105364.
50.
DemenaBAAfesorgborSK (2019) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy138: 111192.
51.
Diaz-CarrionRFranco-LealN (2021) Social and strategic innovation: Extending the varieties of capitalism to Asian countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal18(4): 1453–1474.
52.
DorfRCByersTH (2004) Technology ventures from idea to enterprise. In Medical Entomology and Zoology. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA7196062X.
53.
DumitrescuEHurlinC (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling29(4): 1450–1460.
54.
DurhamJ (2002) Absorptive capacity and the effects of Foreign direct investment and equity foreign portfolio investment on economic growth. European Economic Review48(2): 285–306.
55.
Duval-CouetilNLadischMYiS (2020) Addressing academic researcher priorities through science and technology entrepreneurship education. The Journal of Technology Transfer46(2): 288–318.
56.
El GhakTGdairiaAAbassiB (2021) High-tech entrepreneurship and total factor productivity: The case of innovation-driven economies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy12(3): 1152–1186.
57.
EhrlichIPeiY (2020) Human capital as engine of growth: The role of knowledge transfers in promoting balanced growth within and across countries. Asian Development Review37(2): 225–263.
58.
ErdalLGöçerİ (2015) The effects of foreign direct investment on R&D and innovations: Panel data analysis for developing Asian countries. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences195: 749–758.
59.
ErtugrulMKrishnanKYuQ (2024) Knowledge spillover and entrepreneurship: Evidence from BITNET. Research Policy53(9): 105091.
60.
ErzurumluSSErzurumluYOYoonY (2022) National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method. Technovation114: 102552.
61.
Estrada-CruzMMira-SolvesIMartínez-MateoJ (2024) Adaptation, compensation and disengagement: How ICT competences influence nascent entrepreneurs’ strategies in a global crisis environment. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 10.1108/ejmbe-06-2023-0174.
62.
FachrunnisaOAdhiatmaALukmanN, et al. (2020) Towards SMEs’ digital transformation: The role of agile leadership and strategic flexibility. Journal of Small Business Strategy30(3): 65–85. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/1610.
63.
FreemanC (1988) Technology policy and economic performance, lessons from Japan. Long Range Planning21(2): 107.
64.
FuentelsazLGonzálezCMaícasJP, et al. (2015) How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. BRQ Business Research Quarterly18(4): 246–258.
65.
GalindoMMéndezMT (2014) Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work?Journal of Business Research67(5): 825–829.
66.
GamesDRendiRP (2019) The effects of knowledge management and risk taking on SME financial performance in creative industries in an emerging market: The mediating effect of innovation outcomes. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research9(1). 10.1186/s40497-019-0167-1.
67.
GarudRKarnøeP (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy32(2): 277–300.
68.
GhezziA (2019) Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of lean startup approaches: Effectuation, bricolage and opportunity creation in practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change146: 945–960.
69.
GionfriddoGPiccalugaA (2024) Startups’ contribution to SDGs: A tailored framework for assessing social impact. Journal of Management & Organization30(3): 545–573.
70.
GitelmanLDKozhevnikovMVStarikovEM, et al. (2018) Scaling up the innovation process in the energy sector on the basis of technology entrepreneurship. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment1: 1–12. 10.2495/eq180011.
71.
González-PerníaJLJungAPeñaI (2015) Innovation-driven entrepreneurship in developing economies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development27(9–10): 555–573.
72.
GuerreroMUrbanoD (2016) The transformative role of universities: Determinants, impacts, and challenges. Applying Quality of Life Research: 1–17. 10.1007/978-3-319-32091-5_1.
73.
GyeduSHengTNtarmahAH, et al. (2021) The impact of innovation on economic growth among G7 and BRICS countries: A GMM style panel vector autoregressive approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change173: 121169.
74.
HajouiYEBaouchariNEEz-ZetouniA (2024) Technical progress and endogenous growth: An econometric analysis using panel data on the MENA region. European Scientific Journal ESJ20(19): 200.
75.
HaliliBLGonzalezCR (2025) The contingent effects of economic growth and institutions on income inequality: An empirical study. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development: 1–32. 10.1080/09638199.2025.2451710.
76.
HanSPengDGuoY, et al. (2025) Harnessing technological innovation and renewable energy and their impact on environmental pollution in G-20 countries. Scientific Reports15(1). 10.1038/s41598-025-85182-0.
77.
HartmannDZagatoLGalaP, et al. (2021) Why did some countries catch-up, while others got stuck in the middle? Stages of productive sophistication and smart industrial policies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics58: 1–13.
78.
HekkertMPJanssenMJWesselingJH, et al. (2020) Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions34: 76–79.
79.
HoangTKLeQH (2024) The impact of technical change on income inequality in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development26(4): 329–345.
80.
HongMGeZWuC (2023) The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems by capital, habitus, and practice: A two-phase model based on Bourdieu’s approach. Frontiers in Psychology13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987485.
81.
HopenhaynHSquintaniF (2021) On the direction of innovation. Journal of Political Economy129(7): 1991–2022.
IsiakaAMihailovARazzuG (2025) Government spending reallocations and inequality: Evidence from middle-income countries. Empirical Economics69(3): 1229–1257.
84.
IslamMZRahamanSHChenF (2024) How do R&D and remittances affect economic growth? Evidence from middle-income countries. Heliyon10(9): e30160.
85.
JelinekM (2014) “Thinking technology” in mature industry firms: Understanding technology entrepreneurship. International Journal of Technology Management11: 799–813.
86.
JiaFWangRHuoJ (2022) Optimizing the effectiveness of “Internet +” contest to deepen the reform path of innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing: 1–8. 10.1155/2022/4757271.
87.
JiménezJRPZiesemerTHW (2024) Technology adoption, innovation policy and catching-up. Economic Change and Restructuring57(2). 10.1007/s10644-024-09644-7.
88.
Jones-EvansD (1995) A typology of technology-based entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research1(1): 26–47.
89.
KemenyTOsmanT (2018) The wider impacts of high-technology employment: Evidence from U.S. cities. Research Policy47(9): 1729–1740.
90.
KhanAKhanTAhmadM (2025) The role of technological innovation in sustainable growth: Exploring the economic impact of green innovation and renewable energy. Environmental Challenges18: 101109.
91.
KhanHKhanI (2023) The effect of technological innovations, urbanization and economic growth on environmental quality: Does governance matter?Frontiers in Environmental Science11. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1239288.
92.
KhefachaIBelkacemL (2016) Technology-based ventures and sustainable development: Cointegrating and causal relationships with a panel data approach. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development25(2): 192–212.
93.
KianiTASabirSQayyumU, et al. (2023) Estimating the effect of technological innovations on environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from selected ASEAN and SAARC countries. Environment Development and Sustainability25(7): 6529–6550.
94.
KlyverKMcMullenJS (2025) Rethinking entrepreneurship in causally entangled crises: A poly-crisis perspective. Journal of Business Venturing40(1): 106459.
95.
KnezK (2023) Technology diffusion and uneven development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics33(4): 1171–1195.
96.
KoengkanMFuinhasJAKazemzadehE, et al. (2021) Measuring the economic efficiency performance in Latin American and Caribbean countries: An empirical evidence from stochastic production frontier and data envelopment analysis. International Economics169: 43–54.
97.
KongQPengDNiY, et al. (2021) Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: Empirical analysis using ARDL model. Finance Research Letters38: 101488.
98.
LafuenteEAcsZJSandersM, et al. (2020) The global technology frontier: Productivity growth and the relevance of Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics55(1): 153–178.
99.
LaiYLiuTHwangC (1994) TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research76(3): 486–500.
100.
LakemannTLayJSchnarsR, et al. (2025) Greenfield FDI and job creation in Africa. Review of World Economics61(1): 413–440.
LeeKLimC (2001) Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy30(3): 459–483.
103.
LeeNClarkeS (2019) Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain. Research Policy48(9): 103803.
104.
LeeNRodríguez-PoseA (2016) Is there trickle-down from tech? Poverty, employment, and the high-technology multiplier in U.S. Cities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers106(5): 1114–1134.
105.
LiHPangX (2024) Research on the impact of innovation investment on operating efficiency of listed forest product processing companies. Forestry Economics Review6(1): 74–91.
106.
LiJJiLZhangS, et al. (2024) Digital technology, green innovation, and the carbon performance of manufacturing enterprises. Frontiers in Environmental Science12. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1384332.
107.
LinBZhouY (2022) Does energy efficiency make sense in China? Based on the perspective of economic growth quality. The Science of the Total Environment804: 149895.
108.
LiuPChenWTsaiC (2005) An empirical study on the correlation between the knowledge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan’s industries. Technovation25(6): 637–644.
109.
MammanSOSohagKAbubakarAB (2023) Inclusive growth in Africa: Do fiscal measures matter?Cogent Economics & Finance11(2). 10.1080/23322039.2023.2273604.
110.
MessiasERRosaALC (2022) Sustainable economic development: The necessary dialogue between environmental law and economics. International Journal of Economy Energy and Environment7(2): 45.
111.
MignenanV (2023) Contemporary perspectives for technological entrepreneurship in the age of change: Between success and resilience. International Business Research16(6): 1.
112.
MlachilaMTapsobaRTapsobaS (2014) A quality of growth index for developing countries: A proposal. IMF Working Paper14(172): 1.
113.
MorettiE (2021) The effect of high-tech clusters on the productivity of top inventors. American Economic Review111(10): 3328–3375.
114.
MostafizMIAhmedFUIbrahimF, et al. (2023) Innovation and commercialisation: The role of the international dynamic marketing capability in Malaysian international entrepreneurial firms. International Marketing Review41(1): 199–236.
115.
MsannGKarthiayaniVP (2023) Resource curse and growth challenges in MENA oil exporter countries: A case for governance reforms in the post Arab spring uprisings context. Regional Science Policy & Practice15(5): 992–1008.
116.
MuWJiangX (2024) Absorptive capacity versus competency trap: Experiential knowledge and investment in emerging technologies. Technovation131: 102973.
117.
MughalNArifAJainV, et al. (2021) The role of technological innovation in environmental pollution, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth: Evidence from south Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews39: 100745.
118.
MuñozPKimmittJ (2018) Entrepreneurship and the rest: The missing debate. Journal of Business Venturing Insights9: 100–106.
119.
NelsonRRSampatBN (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization44(1): 31–54.
120.
NooneBMLinMSSharmaA (2022) Firm performance during a crisis: Effects of adhocracy culture, incremental product innovation, and firm size. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research48(1): 153–183.
121.
NorbäckPPerssonL (2023) Why generative AI can make creative destruction more creative but less destructive. Small Business Economics63(1): 349–377.
122.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678
123.
OrdeñanaXVera-GilcesPZambrano-VeraJ, et al. (2023) The effect of high-growth and innovative entrepreneurship on economic growth. Journal of Business Research171: 114243.
124.
ÖzköseHGüneyG (2023) The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study. Technology in Society75: 102368.
125.
PalmA (2022) Innovation systems for technology diffusion: An analytical framework and two case studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change182: 121821.
126.
PersynDWesterlundJ (2008) Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. The Stata Journal Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata8(2): 232–241.
127.
PesaranMH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.572504.
128.
PesaranMH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics22(2): 265–312.
129.
PesaranMHShinY (1995) An autoregressive distributed lag modelling Approach to cointegration analysis.
130.
PesaranMHShinYSmithRP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association94(446): 621–634.
131.
PesaranMHYamagataT (2007) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics142(1): 50–93.
132.
PhamPMHNguyenTDNguyenM, et al. (2025) FDI inflows and carbon emissions: New global evidence. Discover Sustainability6(1). 10.1007/s43621-025-01292-9.
RomerPM (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy98(5, Part 2): S71–S102.
138.
SayedOAAbedelrahimSS (2024) The entrepreneurship-growth nexus in the GCC: Does political stability matter?Cogent Economics & Finance12(1). 10.1080/23322039.2024.2373267.
SergioIIandoloSFerraginaAM (2023) Inter-sectoral and inter-regional knowledge spillovers: The role of ICT and technological branching on innovation in high-tech sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change194: 122728.
141.
ShahzadMFXuS (2024) Antecedents of international entrepreneurship and emerging technologies help to achieve sustainable development goals: Moderating role of global mindset. Technological Forecasting and Social Change209: 123831.
142.
ShiXZengYWuY, et al. (2023) Outward Foreign direct investment and green innovation in Chinese multinational companies. International Business Review32(5): 102160.
143.
SilveiraNJCFerrazDPolloni-SilvaE, et al. (2021) Modeling the building blocks of country-level absorptive capacity: Comparing developed and emergent economies. Bulletin of Economic Research74(3): 783–824.
144.
StamEHartogCVan StelA, et al. (2011) Ambitious entrepreneurship, high-growth firms, and macroeconomic growth. In Oxford University Press EBooks: 231–250. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580866.003.0011.
145.
SteiningerDM (2018) Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT-associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal29(2): 363–407.
146.
StenholmPAcsZJWuebkerR (2011) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing28(1): 176–193.
147.
SugiartiRElmiwatiE (2024) Innovation in entrepreneurship and its role in promoting sustainable economic growth. Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS)3(12): 5375–5381.
148.
SuhrabMChenPUllahA (2023) Digital financial inclusion and income inequality nexus: Can technology innovation and infrastructure development help in achieving sustainable development goals?Technology in Society76: 102411.
149.
SutterCBrutonGDChenJ (2018) Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing34(1): 197–214.
150.
SziklaiBRLengyelB (2022) Finding early adopters of innovation in social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining13(1). 10.1007/s13278-022-01012-5.
151.
TekicATekicZ (2025) Resource endowments as antecedents of high-impact entrepreneurship: Embracing the complexity of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Research197: 115444.
152.
TianLXiangY (2024) Does the digital economy promote or inhibit income inequality?Heliyon10(14): e33533.
153.
TureHDoganSKocakD (2018) Assessing euro 2020 strategy using multi-criteria decision making methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS. Social Indicators Research142(2): 645–665.
154.
UgurMTrushinESolomonE, et al. (2016) R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Research Policy45(10): 2069–2086.
155.
UrbanoDGuerreroMFerreiraJJ, et al. (2018) New technology entrepreneurship initiatives: Which strategic orientations and environmental conditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape?The Journal of Technology Transfer44(5): 1577–1602.
156.
VenkataramanS (2003) Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing19(1): 153–167.
157.
WakoHA (2021) Foreign direct investment in sub-Saharan Africa: Beyond its growth effect. Research in Globalization3: 100054.
158.
WesterlundJEdgertonDL (2007) A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters97(3): 185–190.
159.
XiaoSZhouPZhouL, et al. (2024) Digital economy and urban economic resilience: The mediating role of technological innovation and entrepreneurial vitality. PLoS ONE19(6): e0303782.
160.
YeboahSDGatsiJGAppiahMO, et al. (2024) Examining the drivers of inclusive growth: A study of economic performance, environmental sustainability, and life expectancy in BRICS economies. Research in Globalization9: 100267.
161.
YoonHYunSLeeJ, et al. (2015) Entrepreneurship in east Asian regional innovation systems: Role of social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change100: 83–95.
162.
YoonKHwangC (1985) Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part II—multi-plant strategy and plant relocation. International Journal of Production Research23(2): 361–370.
163.
YouLZhangZWangW, et al. (2023) Learning from innovation award winners? Technology spillovers and firm innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis92: 103053.
164.
YuQZuoXDingH, et al. (2024) Resource rent, economic stability and the legal landscape of China’s green growth. Resources Policy89: 104704.
165.
ZhangQWuPLiR, et al. (2024) Digital transformation and economic growth efficiency improvement in the digital media era: Digitalization of industry or digital industrialization?International Review of Economics & Finance92: 667–677.
166.
ZhaoSJiangYPengX, et al. (2020) Knowledge sharing direction and innovation performance in organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management24(2): 371–394.
167.
ZhaoTShahSaA (2024) Green energy, economic growth, and innovation for sustainable development in OECD countries. Sustainability16(22): 10113.
168.
ZiesemerTHW (2024) Evidence on an endogenous growth model with public R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology: 1–37. 10.1080/10438599.2024.235442.
