Entrepreneurs are often considered rule-breakers who pursue opportunities that exploit institutional contradictions while also seeking an institutional response that deems these violations acceptable. We investigate this phenomenon during institutional instability, where entrepreneurs face severe restrictions imposed by an exogenous crisis, though they cannot draw upon a largely shared consensus to achieve legitimacy, thereby threatening their economic survival. Investigating 55 micro-small Italian enterprises which deliberately violated regulatory restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, we built a grounded model of three important contributions at the crossroads of rule-breaking entrepreneurship and legitimacy in times of institutional instability. First, we extend the concept of ‘forgiveness’ from evaluators, which aims to suspend rather than change evaluators’ judgements. Second, we show how entrepreneurs seek a ‘selected’ rather than a ‘generalised’ consensus to be at least tolerated by some key evaluators. Third, we document socio-cognitive strategies to attract consensus when a shared judgement of object legitimacy is missing.
AshforthBE (2019) Stigma and legitimacy: Two ends of a single continuum or different continua altogether?Journal of Management Inquiry28(1): 22–30.
2.
BapujiHde BakkerFGBrownJA, et al. (2020) Business and society research in times of the corona crisis. Business & Society59(6): 1067–1078.
3.
Barin CruzLAguilar DelgadoNLecaB, et al. (2016) Institutional resilience in extreme operating environments: The role of institutional work. Business & Society55(7): 970–1016.
4.
BitektineAHaackP (2015) The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Towards a multi-level theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review40: 49–75.
5.
BitektineAB (2011) Towards a theory of social judgment of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review36: 151–179.
6.
BrenkertGG (2009) Innovation, rule breaking and the ethics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing24(5): 448–464.
7.
BucarBGlasMHisrichRD (2003) Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 261–281.
8.
CannatelliBLSmithBRSydowA (2021) Entrepreneurship in the controversial economy: Toward a research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics155: 837–851.
9.
ClarkeSLRhodesES (2020) Entrepreneurial apologies: The mediating role of forgiveness on future cooperation. Journal of Business Venturing Insights13: e00147.
10.
ClementeMRouletTJ (2015) Public opinion as a source of deinstitutionalization: A “spiral of silence” approach. Academy of Management Review40(1): 96–114.
11.
CoyneCJLeesonPT (2004) The plight of underdeveloped countries. The Cato Journal24: 235.
12.
CreedWDDeJordyRLokJ (2010) Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal53(6): 1336–1364.
13.
DeerfieldAElertN (2023) Entrepreneurship and regulatory voids: The case of ridesharing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(5): 1568–1593.
14.
ElertNHenreksonM (2016) Evasive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics47: 95–113.
15.
ElertNHenreksonMWernbergJ (2016) Two sides to the evasion: The pirate bay and the interdependencies of evasive entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy5(2): 176–200.
16.
FisherGKuratkoDFBloodgoodJM, et al. (2017) Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing32(1): 52–71.
17.
GephartRP (2004) Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 454–462.
18.
GioiaDACorleyKGHamiltonAL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
19.
GiorgiS (2017) The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies54(5): 711–738.
20.
HaackPSchilkeOZuckerL (2021) Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. Journal of Management Studies58(3): 749–781.
21.
HampelCTraceyP (2019) Introducing a spectrum of moral evaluation: Integrating organizational stigmatization and moral legitimacy. Journal of Management Inquiry28(1): 11–15.
22.
HelmsWSPattersonKD (2014) Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: The positive implications of stigma for MMA organizations. Academy of Management Journal57(5): 1453–1484.
23.
HelmsWSPattersonKDHudsonBA (2019) Let’s not “taint” stigma research with legitimacy, please. Journal of Management Inquiry28(1): 5–10.
24.
HudsonBAOkhuysenGA (2009) Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science20(1): 134–153.
25.
HuyQCorleyKKraatzM (2014) From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Academy of Management Journal57: 1650–1680.
26.
IlliaLColleoniEEtterM, et al. (2023) Finding the tipping point: When heterogeneous evaluations in social media converge and influence organizational legitimacy. Business & Society62(1): 117–150.
27.
LounsburyMGlynnMA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal22(6-7): 545–564.
28.
LucasDSFullerCSPackardMD (2022) Made to be broken? A theory of regulatory governance and rule-breaking entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing37(6): 106250.
29.
McKnightBZietsmaC (2018) Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. Journal of Business Venturing33(4): 493–512.
30.
McMullenJSDimovD (2013) Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies50(8): 1481–1512.
31.
O’NeilIUcbasaranD (2016) Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing31(2): 133–152.
32.
PatriottaGGondJPSchultzF (2011) Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies48: 1804–1836.
33.
RappDJHugheyJMKreinerGE (2024) Dirty heroes? Healthcare workers’ experience of mixed social evaluations during the pandemic. Academy of Management Journal67(4): 1124–1157.
34.
RutherfordMWBullerPF (2007) Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry16(1): 78–92.
35.
SchilkeOXueZHaackP (2025) Legitimacy construction in the presence of multiple validity cues: An experimental investigation. In: Handbook of Social Psychology: Micro, Meso, and Macro Perspectives. Cham: Springer, 429–439.
36.
Sewell JrWH (1996) Historical events as transformations of structures: Inventing revolution at the bastille. Theory and Society25(6): 841–881.
37.
SirazSSClaesBDe CastroJO, et al. (2023) Theorizing the grey area between legitimacy and illegitimacy. Journal of Management Studies60(4): 924–962.
38.
SottiniACannatelliBL (2023) Entrepreneurship and misconducting behaviors: A conceptual model of institutional divergence. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation24(4): 257–267.
39.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques, 2nd edNew York: Sage.
40.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
41.
SuddabyRBitektineAHaackP (2017) Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals11(1): 451–478.
42.
TostLP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review36(4): 686–710.
43.
VoronovMJarvisL (2025) Emotions, institutions, and power. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
WadhwaniRDKirschDWelterF, et al. (2020) Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal14(1): 3–19.
45.
ZhangSO’ConnorPAdamsJ (2025) From belief to action: How constructive rule beliefs influence rule-breaking in entrepreneurial settings. Journal of Small Business Management63(5): 2288–2319.
46.
ZhangZArveyRD (2009) Rule breaking in adolescence and entrepreneurial status: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Venturing24(5): 436–447.
47.
ZietsmaCToubianaM (2018) The valuable, the constitutive, and the energetic: Exploring the impact and importance of studying emotions and institutions. Organization Studies39(4): 427–443.
48.
ZighanSAbualqumbozMDwaikatN, et al. (2022) The role of entrepreneurial orientation in developing SMEs resilience capabilities throughout COVID-19. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation23(4): 227–239.
49.
ZimmermanMAZeitzGJ (2002) Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review27(3): 414–431.
50.
ZuckerLG (1977) The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review42: 726–743.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
