Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Who is willing to become a spin-out founder? Differences in the impact of an individual's career and experience between employee entrepreneurship and turnover
This study explores employee mobility from the perspectives of entrepreneurship and job switching, using a sample of 9345 individuals aged 18–69 years who hold full-time jobs in Japan, obtained from a questionnaire survey. We identify how individual-specific characteristics influence an individual’s intention to start a business and change jobs, by estimating the average marginal effects based on a bivariate probit model. Our results reveal that varied work experience influences job change intention rather than entrepreneurial intention. We also find that innovation experience and award-winning experience are positively associated with both entrepreneurial and job change intentions. Moreover, the impact of gender and parents’ start-up experience differs between entrepreneurial and job change intentions, while risk tolerance is positively associated with both of these intentions. We contribute to the literature by highlighting the similarities and differences between employee entrepreneurship and turnover.
AgarwalRCampbellBAFrancoAM, et al. (2016) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder-firm performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal59(3): 1060–1087.
2.
ÅstebroTThompsonP (2011) Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos?Research Policy40(5): 637–649.
3.
BarbosaSDFayolleASmithBR (2019) Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing34(3): 528–557.
4.
BeckerG (1975) Human Capital, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BlanchflowerDGOswaldAJ (1998) What makes an entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics16(1): 26–60.
6.
CaliendoMFossenFMKritikosAS (2009) Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs—New evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics32: 153–167.
7.
CampbellBAGancoMFrancoAM, et al. (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management Journal33(1): 65–87.
8.
CaoZPosenHE (2023) When does the pre-entry experience of new entrants improve their performance? A meta-analytical investigation of critical moderators. Organization Science34(2): 613–636.
9.
ChatterjiAKde FigueredoRJPRawleyE (2016) Learning on the job? Employee mobility in the asset management industry. Management Science62(10): 2804–2819.
10.
CramerJHartogJJonkerN, et al. (2002) Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: An empirical test of a truism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization48(1): 29–36.
11.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
12.
DenckerJCGruberMShahSK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organization Science20(3): 516–537.
13.
DingWChoiE (2011) Divergent paths to commercial science: A comparison of scientists’ founding and advising activities. Research Policy40(1): 69–80.
14.
EvansDSJovanovicB (1989) An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy97(4): 808–827.
15.
FrancoAMFilsonD (2006) Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. RAND Journal of Economics37(4): 841–860.
16.
GambardellaAGancoMHonoréF (2015) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organization Science26(2): 456–474.
17.
GancoM (2013) Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal34(6): 666–686.
18.
GastJWernerAKrausS (2017) Antecedents of the small firm effect: The role of knowledge spillover and blocked mobility for employee entrepreneurial intentions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal13: 277–297.
19.
GiffordS (1993) Heterogeneous ability, career choice and firm size. Small Business Economics5: 249–259.
20.
GuerraGPatuelliR (2016) The role of job satisfaction in transitions into self-employment. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice40(3): 543–571.
21.
HonjoY (2015) Why are entrepreneurship levels so low in Japan?Japan and the World Economy36: 88–101.
22.
HonjoYKatoMTakahashiH (2025) Who is willing to be rich and king? Founder-CEOs’ IPO and M&A intentions. Journal of Small Business Management63(2): 528–557.
23.
HonjoYNakamuraH (2020) The link between entrepreneurship and informal investment: An international comparison. Japan and the World Economy54: 101012.
24.
HsiehCParkerSCVan PraagCM (2017) Risk, balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics48: 287–302.
25.
HvideHSPanosGA (2014) Risk tolerance and entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics111(1): 200–223.
26.
HyytinenAIlmakunnasP (2007) Entrepreneurial aspirations: Another form of job search?Small Business Economics29: 63–80.
27.
JiaoHYangDGaoM, et al. (2016) Entrepreneurial ability and technological innovation: Evidence from publicly listed companies in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change112: 164–170.
28.
KatoM (2020) Founders’ human capital and external knowledge sourcing: Exploring the absorptive capacity of start-up firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology29(2): 184–205.
29.
KautonenTVan GelderenMFinkM (2015) Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(3): 655–674.
30.
KimPHAldrichHEKeisterLA (2006) Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics26: 5–27.
31.
KlyverKHonigBSteffensP (2018) Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: Exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective. Small Business Economics51: 709–734.
32.
KraftPSGüntherCKammerlanderNH, et al. (2022) Overconfidence and entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of different types of overconfidence in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing37(4): 106207.
33.
KriegerAStuetzerMObschonkaM, et al. (2022) The growth of entrepreneurial human capital: Origins and development of skill variety. Small Business Economics59: 645–664.
34.
LazearEP (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings94: 208–211.
35.
LazearEP (2005) Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics23(4): 649–680.
36.
LevineDI (1993) What do wages buy?Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 462–483.
37.
LiaoYKNguyenVHACaputoA (2022) Unveiling the role of entrepreneurial knowledge and cognition as antecedents of entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal18(4): 1623–1652.
38.
LindquistMJSolJVan PraagM (2015) Why do entrepreneurial parents have entrepreneurial children?Journal of Labor Economics33(2): 269–296.
39.
LumpkinGTMossTWGrasDM, et al. (2013) Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all?Small Business Economics40: 761–783.
40.
MartinBCMcNallyJJKayMJ (2013) Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing28(2): 211–224.
41.
MarvelMR (2013) Human capital and search-based discovery: A study of high-tech entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(2): 403–419.
42.
MarvelMRDavisJLSproulCR (2016) Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice40(3): 599–626.
43.
MawdsleyJKSomayaD (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Management42(1): 85–113.
44.
MincerJ (1974) Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
NeffkeFMHOttoAWeyhA (2017) Inter-industry labor flows. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization142: 275–292.
46.
OECD (2022) The New Workplace in Japan: Skills for a Strong Recovery, Getting Skills Right. Paris: OECD Publishing.
47.
PaikY (2014) Serial entrepreneurs and venture survival: Evidence from U.S. venture-capital-financed semiconductor firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal8(3): 254–268.
48.
ParkerSCVan PraagCM (2012) The entrepreneur’s mode of entry: Business takeover or new venture start?Journal of Business Venturing27(1): 31–46.
49.
PudelkoM (2009) The end of Japanese-style management?Long Range Planning42(4): 439–462.
50.
Rodríguez-PlanasNTanakaR (2022) Gender norms and women’s decision to work: Evidence from Japan. Review of Economics of the Household20(1): 15–36.
51.
ShabsoughTSemerciABErgeneliA (2021) Women’s entrepreneurial intention: The role of sticky floor perception and social networking. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation22(1): 45–55.
52.
ShaneSLockeEACollinsCJ (2003) Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review13(2): 257–279.
53.
ShaneSVenkatramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
54.
ShraderRSiegelDS (2007) Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: Evidence from technology-based new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(6): 893–908.
55.
SteelRPLounsburyJW (2009) Turnover process models: Review and synthesis of a conceptual literature. Human Resource Management Review19(4): 271–282.
56.
StuckiT (2014) Success of start-up firms: The role of financial constraints. Industrial and Corporate Change23(1): 25–64.
57.
StuetzerMObschonkaMDavidssonP, et al. (2013) Where do entrepreneurial skills come from?Applied Economics Letters20(12): 1183–1186.
58.
SymeLMuellerE (2022) Does skill balancing prepare for entrepreneurship? Testing the underlying assumption of the jack-of-all-trades view. Applied Economics54(10): 1145–1161.
59.
TaghizadehSKAl RiyamiSRahmanSA, et al. (2024) Does entrepreneurial intention for innovation at firm-level matter to affect performance?International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation25(4): 263–273.
60.
TakahashiHHonjoYKatoM (2024) The gender gap in the first deal: Equity split among founding teams. Journal of Banking and Finance168: 107272.
61.
TaylorMP (1999) Survival of the fittest? An analysis of self-employment duration in Britain. Economic Journal109: C140–C155.
62.
TsouESteelPOsiyevskyyO (2023) The relationship between entrepreneurial intention and behavior: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation(forthcoming).
63.
UcbasaranDWestheadPWrightM (2008) Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter?Small Business Economics30: 153–173.
64.
UngerJMRauchAFreseM, et al. (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analysis review. Journal of Business Venturing26(3): 341–358.
65.
Van der WesthuizenTGoyayiMJ (2020) The influence of technology on entrepreneurial self-efficacy development for online business start-up in developing nations. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation21(3): 168–177.
66.
WagnerJ (2003) Testing Lazear’s jack-of-all trades view of entrepreneurship with German micro data. Applied Economics Letters10(11): 687–689.
67.
WagnerJ (2006) Are nascent entrepreneurs ‘Jacks-of-all-trades’? A test of Lazear’s theory of entrepreneurship with German data. Applied Economics38(20): 2415–2419.
68.
WernerAGastJKrausS (2014) The effect of working time preferences and fair wage perceptions on entrepreneurial intentions among employees. Small Business Economics43: 137–160.
69.
XiaoJDahlstrandÅL (2023) Skill-biased acquisitions? Human capital and employee mobility in small technology firms. Small Business Economics60(3): 1219–1247.
70.
XiaoYDowejkoMKAuK, et al. (2020) “Jack-of all-trades” with passion: Keener to pursue startup in a team?Journal of Small Business Management58(4): 806–833.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
