This study argues that the adoption of a policy by the European Union increases popular support for that policy. Elite cue theory implies that this effect only materializes among those members of the public who trust European Union institutions. Moreover, European Union member states’ unanimous policy support conveys a stronger cue than the Union’s policy endorsement despite vocal dissent. The argument is tested through original survey experiments and the quasi-experimental analysis of a survey that was fielded while the European Council endorsed a salient policy proposal. Support of the policy surged immediately after this decision—but only among Europeans who trust the Union. Experiments in original national surveys confirm that citizens who trust the European Union respond to signals from Brussels. Unanimity in the Council of the European Union augments the impact of these cues.
AklinMUrpelainenJ (2014) Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy. Environmental Science and Policy38: 173–177.
2.
ArmingeonKCekaB (2014) The loss of trust in the European Union during the great recession since 2007: The role of heuristics from the national political system. European Union Politics15(1): 82–107.
3.
AzroutRSpanjeJde VreeseC (2012) When news matters: Media effects on public support for Eropean Union enlargement in 21 countries. Journal of Common Market Studies50(5): 691–708.
4.
BailerSMattilaMSchneiderG (2015) Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the council of ministers. Journal of Common Market Studies53(3): 437–456.
5.
BaumMGroelingT (2010) War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Public Views of War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BearceDCookT (2018) The first image reversed: IGO signals and mass political attitudes. Review of International Organizations13(4): 595–619.
7.
BechtelMHainmuellerJMargalitY (2014) Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the eurozone bailouts. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 835–856.
8.
BechtelMSchneiderG (2010) Eliciting substance from ‘hot air’: Financial market responses to EU summit decisions on European defense. International Organization64(2): 199–223.
9.
BerinskyA (2007) Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. Journal of Politics69(4): 975–997.
10.
BerryMGarcia-BlancoIMooreK (2015) Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries. Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism.
11.
BølstadJ (2015) Dynamics of European integration: Public opinion in the core and periphery. European Union Politics16(1): 23–44.
12.
BrodyR (1991) Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13.
BuchholzK (2023) Which Countries are EU Contributors and Beneficiaries? Statista 27 June.
14.
CareyS (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstactle to European integration?European Union Politics3(4): 387–413.
15.
DanieleGGeysB (2015) Public support for European fiscal integration in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy22(5): 650–670.
16.
De VreeseC (2003) Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.
17.
De VreeseCBoomgaardenH (2005) Projecting EU referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics6(1): 59–82.
18.
De VriesC (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?European Union Politics8(3): 363–385.
19.
De VriesC (2017) Benchmarking Brexit: How the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. Journal of Common Market Studies55(1): 38–53.
20.
De VriesC (2018) Euroscepticism and the future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
De VriesCEdwardsE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public Euroskepticism. Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
22.
De VriesCVan Der BrugWVan EgmondM and Van Der Eijk C. (2011) Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: The role of political information. Electoral Studies30(1): 16–28.
23.
DragojlovicN (2013) Leaders without borders: Familiarity as a moderator of transnational source cue. Political Communication30(2): 297–316.
24.
European Commission (2019) Eurobarometer 92.3. Brussels: European Union.
25.
European Commission (2019) Media Use in the European Union. Brussels: European Union.
26.
European Commission (2020) Eurobarometer 93.1. Brussels: European Union.
27.
European Union (2020) Asylum applicants by type of applicant, citizenship, age and sex—monthly data (rounded). Eurostat Dataset.
28.
FangSSunF (2019) Gauging Chinese public support for China’s role in peacekeeping. Chinese Journal of International Politics12(2): 179–201.
29.
FranklinMMarshMMcLarenL (1994) Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the Wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies32(4): 455–472.
30.
GabelM (1998) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
GabelMPalmerH (1995) Understanding variation in public support for European integration. European Journal of Political Research27(1): 3–19.
32.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Estimating the effect of elite communications on public opinion using instrumental variables. American Journal of Political Science51(4): 1013–1028.
33.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Mixed messages: Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 37–59.
34.
GelpiC (2010) Performing on cue? The formation of public opinion toward war. Journal of Conflict Resolution54(1): 88–116.
35.
GerhardsJLengfeldHIgnácsZet al. (2020) European Solidarity in Times of Crisis: Insights From a Thirteen-Country Survey. New York: Routledge.
36.
GolbyJFeaverPDroppK (2018) Elite military cues and public opinion about the use of military force. Armed Forces and Society44(1): 44–71.
37.
GreenhillB (2020) How can international organizations shape public opinion? Analysis of a pair of survey-based experiments. Review of International Organizations15(1): 165–188.
38.
GriecoJGelpiCReiflerJet al. (2011) Let’s get a second opinion: International institutions and American public support for war. International Studies Quarterly55(2): 563–583.
39.
GuerraSMcLarenL (2016) Public Opinion and the European Union. In: Cini M and Pérez-Solórzano Borragán N (eds.) European Union Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352–364.
40.
GuisingerASaundersE (2017) Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: How elites shape mass opinion across international issues. International Studies Quarterly61(2): 425–441.
41.
HägeF (2013) Coalition building and consensus in the council of the European Union. British Journal of Political Science43(3): 481–504.
42.
HagemannSBailerSHerzogA (2019) Signals to their parliaments? Governments’ use of votes and policy statements in the EU council. Journal of Common Market Studies57(3): 634–650.
43.
HagemannSHoboltSWratilC (2017) Government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from council voting. Comparative Political Studies50(6): 850–876. doi:10414015621077
44.
HayesDGuardinoM (2010) Whose views made the news? Media coverage and the March to War in Iraq. Political Communication27(1): 59–87.
45.
HayesDGuardinoM (2011) The influence of foreign voices on U.S. public opinion. American Journal of Political Science55(4): 830–850.
46.
HoboltS (2007) Taking cues on Europe? Voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. European Journal of Political Research46(2): 151–182.
47.
HoboltS (2009) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
HoboltS (2014) Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy21(5): 664–680.
49.
HoboltS (2015) The 2014 European parliament elections: Divided in unity?Journal of Common Market Studies53(1): 6–21.
50.
HoboltSDe VriesC (2016) Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
51.
HoboltSWratilC (2020) Contestation and responsiveness in EU council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy27(3): 362–381.
52.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
53.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
54.
IkedaMTagoA (2014) Winning over foreign domestic support for use of force: Power of diplomatic and operational multilateralism. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific14(2): 303–324.
55.
JohnsRDaviesG (2014) Coalitions of the willing? International backing and British public support for military action. Journal of Peace Research51(6): 767–781.
56.
KleiderHStoeckelF (2019) The politics of international redistribution: Explaining public support for fiscal transfers in the EU. European Journal of Political Research58(1): 4–29.
57.
KlingemannHDVolkensABaraJet al. (2007) Mapping policy preferences II: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
KuhnTSolazHvan ElsasE (2018) Practising what you preach: How cosmopolitanism promotes willingness to redistribute across the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy25(12): 1759–1778.
59.
KuhnTStoeckelF (2014) When European integration becomes costly: The Euro crisis and public support for European economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy21(4): 624–641.
MaierJRittbergerB (2008) Shifting Europe’s boundaries: Mass media, public opinion and the enlargement of the EU. European Union Politics9(2): 243–267.
62.
MaierMAdamSMaierJ (2017) Does the messenger matter? A comparison of the effects of Eurosceptic messages communicated by mainstream and radical right-wing parties on citizens’ EU attitudes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties27(3): 330–349.
63.
MaliniakDParajonEPowersR (2021) Epistemic communities and public support for the Paris agreement on climate change. Political Research Quarterly74(4): 866–881.
64.
McLarenL (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat?Journal of Politics64(2): 551–566.
65.
NovakS (2013) The silence of ministers: Consensus and blame avoidance in the council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies51(6): 1091–1107.
66.
PannicoR (2017) Is the European Union too complicated? Citizens’ lack of information and party cue effectiveness. European Union Politics18(3): 424–446.
67.
PeaseABrewerP (2008) the oprah factor: The effects of a celebrity endorsement in a presidential primary campaign. International Journal of Press/Politics13(4): 386–400.
68.
RayL (2003) When parties matter: The conditional influence of party positions on voter opinions about European integration. Journal of Politics65(4): 978–994.
69.
Sánchez-CuencaI (2000) The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics1(2): 147–171.
70.
SchneiderC (2019) The Responsive Union: National Elections and European Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SteenbergenMEdwardsEde VriesC (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
72.
StoeckelF (2013) Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion. European Union Politics14(1): 23–45.
73.
StoeckelFKuhnT (2018) Mobilizing citizens for costly policies: The conditional effect of party cues on support for international bailouts in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies56(2): 446–461.
74.
ThompsonA (2009) Channels of Power: The UN Security Council and U.S. Statecraft in Iraq. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
75.
TrimbornM (2015) Erster Kompromiss in Brüssel. DPA 25 Septemb.
76.
WalterS (2020) The Mass Politics of International Disintegration. CIS Working Paper 105.
77.
WalterSDinasEJuradoIet al. (2018) Noncooperation by popular vote: Expectations, foreign intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum. International Organization72(4): 969–994.
78.
WratilC (2018) Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiation positions. European Union Politics19(1): 52–74.
79.
WratilCWäckerleJ (2023) Majority representation and legitimacy: Survey-experimental evidence from the European Union. European Journal of Political Research62(1): 285–307.
80.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
ZinkJSpriggsJScottJ (2009) Courting the public: The influence of decision attributes on individuals views of court opinions. Journal of Politics71(3): 909–925.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
