Supranational bureaucracies are often promoted as a solution to collective action problems. In the European Union context, investing the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy with new agenda-setting powers was expected to improve the coherence, continuity and efficiency of foreign policy-making. Relying on novel fine-grained and comprehensive data about the content and duration of working party meetings, the study maps and analyses the allocation of political attention to different foreign policy issues between 2001 and 2014. The results show that the empowerment of the High Representative by the Lisbon Treaty had little immediate effect on the Council’s foreign policy agenda. However, the study also indicates that this result might be due to a lack of capability and ambition rather than weak institutional prerogatives.
AlexandrovaPTimmermansA (2013)
National interest versus the common good: The Presidency in European Council agenda setting. European Journal of Political Research52(3): 316–338.
2.
AlexandrovaPCarammiaMPrincenS, et al. (2014)
Measuring the European Council agenda: Introducing a new approach and dataset. European Union Politics15(1): 152–167.
3.
AllenDSmithM (2011)
Relations with the rest of the world. Journal of Common Market Studies49(S1): 209–230.
4.
AllenDSmithM (2012)
Relations with the rest of the world. Journal of Common Market Studies50(S1): 162–177.
5.
BachrachPBaratzMS (1962)
Two faces of power. American Political Science Review56(4): 947–952.
6.
BaumgartnerFRJonesBDWilkersonJ (2011)
Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies44(8): 947–972.
7.
BengtssonRElgströmOTallbergJ (2004)
Silencer or amplifier? The European Union Presidency and the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Political Studies27(3): 311–334.
CrumB (2007)
Can the EU Presidency make its mark on interstate bargains? The Italian and Irish Presidencies of the 2003-04 IGC. Journal of European Public Policy14(8): 1208–1226.
10.
DijkstraH (2012)
Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An institutionalist perspective. Cooperation and Conflict47(4): 454–472.
11.
DürAMateoG (2008)
The Irish EU Presidency and the Constitutional Treaty: Neutrality, skills and effective mediation. Irish Political Studies23(1): 59–76.
HägeFM (2013) Bureaucrats as Law-Makers: Committee Decision-Making in the EU Council of Ministers.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
14.
HägeFM (2016)
Political attention in the Council of the European Union: A new dataset of working party meetings, 1995–2014. European Union Politics17(4): 683–703.
15.
HägeFM (2017)
The scheduling power of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy24(5): 695–713.
HelwigNRügerC (2014)
In search of a role for the High Representative: The legacy of Catherine Ashton. The International Spectator49(4): 1–17.
18.
HinichMJMungerMC (1997) Analytical Politics.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
19.
JonesBDBaumgartnerFRTalbertJC, et al. (1993)
The destruction of issue monopolies in Congress. American Political Science Review87(3): 657–671.
20.
KeohaneR (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
21.
KleineM (2013a) Informal Governance in the European Union: How Governments Make International Organizations Work.
Ithaka:
Cornell University Press.
22.
KleineM (2013b)
Knowing your limits: Informal governance and judgment in the EU. Review of International Organizations8(2): 245–264.
23.
KoremenosBLipsonCSnidalD, et al. (2001)
The rational design of international institutions. International Organization55(4): 761–799.
24.
MoravcsikA (1993)
Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies31(4): 473–524.
25.
Official Journal (2009) Rules of Procedure of the Council. L 325, 36-61.
Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
26.
PollackMA (1997)
Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization51(1): 99–134.
27.
PomorskaKVanhoonackerS (2015)
Europe as a global actor: The (un)holy trinity of economy, diplomacy and security. Journal of Common Market Studies53(S1): 216–229.
28.
PrincenS (2009) Agenda-Setting in the European Union.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
SmeetsSVennixJ (2014) ‘
How to make the most of your time in the chair’: EU presidencies and the management of Council debates. Journal of European Public Policy21(10): 1435–1451.
30.
SteinAA (1982)
Coordination and zollaboration: Regimes in an anarchic world. International Organization36(2): 299–324.
31.
TallbergJ (2002)
Delegation to supranational institutions: Why, how, and with what consequences?West European Politics25(1): 23–46.
32.
TallbergJ (2003)
The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European Public Policy10(1): 1–19.
33.
TallbergJ (2004)
The power of the Presidency: Brokerage, efficiency and distribution in EU negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies42(5): 999–1022.
34.
TallbergJ (2006) Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
35.
TallbergJ (2010)
The power of the chair: Formal leadership in international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly54(1): 241–265.
36.
ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCH, et al. (2006) The European Union Decides.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
37.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
38.
VanhoonackerSPomorskaK (2013)
The European External Action Service and agenda-setting in European foreign policy. Journal of European Public Policy20(9): 1316–1331.
39.
WarntjenA (2007)
Steering the Union: The impact of the EU Presidency on legislative activity in the Council. Journal of Common Market Studies45(5): 1135–1157.
40.
WarntjenA (2013)
Overcoming gridlock: The Council Presidency, legislative activity and issue de-coupling in the area of occupational health and safety regulation. Journal of Contemporary European Research9(1): 39–59.
41.
WeingastB (2002) Rational choice institutionalism. In: Katznelson I and Milner HV (eds) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: W. W. Norton, pp.660–692.
42.
WestlakeMGallowayD (2004) The Council of the European Union.
London:
John Harper Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
