Members of Parliament are often thought to attract funding into their constituencies to increase their local support, and eventually, secure re-election. Nevertheless, there is only limited research focusing on the question whether or not government funding indeed affects the MPs’ electoral performances. I focus on pork barrel politics in a single country, namely Hungary, and use town-level European Union Structural Funds data between 2007 and 2010 to explain the electoral performance of single-member district MPs at the 2010 general elections. I find that increasing funding improves government MPs’ electoral performances and that the size of the effect is conditional upon the mayors’ party affiliations. In towns with government mayors, government MPs perform significantly better than in towns with opposition mayors. The results have consequences in the fields of the distribution of Structural Funds, the electoral connection between legislators and voters and the European Union’s contribution to regime legitimation.
AchenCH (2001) Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. In: Annual meeting of the political methodology section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, CA, 2001.
2.
AlvarezRMSavingJL (1997)
Deficits, democrats, and distributive benefits: Congressional elections and the pork barrel in the 1980s.Political Research Quarterly50(4): 809–831.
3.
AmesB (1995)
Electoral rules, constituency pressures, and pork barrel: Bases of voting in the Brazilian congress.The Journal of Politics57(2): 324–343.
4.
AndersonCJ (2000)
Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective.Electoral Studies19(2–3): 151–170.
5.
BanaszewskaMBischoffI (2017) EU funds and the prospect of re-election: Evidence from local elections in Poland. In: EU Cohesion Policy in Eastern and Southern Europe: Taking Stock, Poznan, 2017.
6.
BickersKNSteinRM (1996)
The electoral dynamics of the federal pork barrel.American Journal of Political Science40(4): 1300–1326.
7.
BloomSPetrovaV (2013)
National subversion of supranational goals: ‘pork-barrel’ politics and EU regional aid.Europe-Asia Studies65(8): 1599–1620.
8.
Bodenstein T and Kemmerling A (2012) Ripples in a Rising Tide: Why Some EU Regions Receive More Structural Funds than Others. European Integration Online Paper 16: 1--24.
9.
BorrazOJohnP (2004)
The transformation of Urban Political Leadership in Western Europe.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(1): 107–120.
10.
BouvetFDall’erbaS (2010)
European regional structural funds: How large is the influence of politics on the allocation process?Journal of Common Market Studies48(3): 501–528.
11.
BurkhartRELewis-BeckMS (1994)
Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis.The American Political Science Review88(4): 903–910.
12.
CainBFerejohnJFiorinaMP (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
13.
CalvoEMurilloMV (2004)
Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market.American Journal of Political Science48(4): 742–757.
14.
CaseA (2001)
Election goals and income redistribution: Recent evidence from Albania.European Economic Review45(3): 405–423.
15.
CastellsASolé-OlléA (2005)
The regional allocation of infrastructure investment: The role of equity, efficiency and political factors.European Economic Review49(5): 1165–1205.
16.
Costa-I-FontJRodriguez-OreggiaELunaplaD (2003)
Political competition and pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico. Public Choice116(1/2): 185–204.
17.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (1986)
Electoral politics as a redistributive game.The Journal of Politics48(2): 370–389.
18.
DahlbergMJohanssonE (2002)
On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments.American Political Science Review96(1): 27–40.
19.
DebusMGrossM (2016)
Coalition formation at the local level: Institutional constraints, party policy conflict, and office-seeking political parties.Party Politics22(6): 835–846.
20.
Dellmuth LM (2011) The cash divide: the allocation of European Union regional grants. Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 1016--1033.
21.
DellmuthLMStoffelMF (2012)
Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union structural funds.European Union Politics13(3): 413–433.
22.
DellmuthLMSchraffDStoffelMF (2017)
Distributive politics, electoral institutions and European structural and investment funding: Evidence from Italy and France.Journal of Common Market Studies55(2): 275–293.
23.
DenemarkD (2000)
Partisan Pork Barrel in parliamentary systems: Australian constituency-level grants.The Journal of Politics62(3): 896–915.
FazekasMChvalkovskaJJiriS, et al. (2014) Are EU funds a corruption risk? The impact of EU funds on grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Mungiu-PippidiA (ed) The Anticorruption Frontline. The ANTICORRP Project. vol.
2.
Berlin:
Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp.68–89.
26.
FazekasMKingLPTóthIJ (2013) Hidden depths: The case of Hungary. In: Mungiu-PippidiA (ed) Controlling Corruption in Europe. vol.
1.
Berlin:
Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp.74–82.
27.
FeldmanPJondrowJ (1984)
Congressional elections and local federal.American Journal of Political Science28(1): 147–164.
28.
GerringJ (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
29.
GoldenMAPicciL (2008)
Pork-Barrel politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94.American Journal of Political Science52(2): 268–289.
30.
Hainmueller J, Mummolo J and Xu Y (2018) How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice. Political Analysis 27(2): 163--192.
31.
HeineltHHlepasN (2006) Typologies of local government systems. In: BäckHHeineltHMagnierA (eds) The European Mayor. Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy.
Wiesbaden:
Springer, pp.21–42.
32.
JohnPWardH (2001)
Political manipulation in a majoritarian democracy: Central government targeting of public funds to English Subnational Government, in space and across time.The British Journal of Politics and International Relations3(3): 308–339.
33.
KálmánJ (2011) Derangement or development? Political economy of EU structural funds allocation in new member states – Insights from the Hungarian Case.
34.
KemmerlingABodensteinT (2006)
Partisan politics in regional redistribution: Do parties affect the distribution of EU structural funds across regions?European Union Politics7(3): 373–392.
KneeboneRDMcKenzieKJ (2001)
Electoral and Partisan cycles in fiscal policy: An examination of Canadian Provinces. International Tax and Public Finance8(5–6): 753–774.
LancasterTD (1986)
Electoral structures and pork barrel politics.International Political Science Review7(1): 67–81.
40.
LancasterTDPattersonWD (1990)
Comparative pork barrel politics: Perceptions from the West German Bundestag.Comparative Political Studies22(4): 458–477.
41.
LeighA (2008)
Bringing home the bacon: An empirical analysis of the extent and effects of pork-barreling in Australian politics.Public Choice137(1–2): 279–299.
42.
LevittSDSnyderJM (1997)
The impact of federal spending on house election outcomes.Journal of Political Economy105(1): 30–53.
43.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000)
Economic determinants of electoral outcomes.Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 183–219.
44.
Lewis‐BeckMSStegmaierM (2007) Economic models of voting. In: DaltonRJKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, pp. 518--537.
45.
LuoRZhangPLHuangJ, et al. (2010)
Village elections, public goods investments and pork barrel politics, Chinese-style.The Journal of Development Studies46(4): 662–684.
46.
MagnierA (2006) Strong mayors? On direct election and mayors’ entrepreneurship. In: BäckHHeineltHMagnierA (eds) The European Mayor. Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy.
New York:
Springer, pp.351–374.
47.
MayhewDR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. 2nd ed.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
48.
Medve-BálintG (2015) Converging on Divergence: The Political Economy of Uneven Regional Development in East Central Europe (1989-2014).
Central European University,
Budapest.
49.
Medve-BálintG (2017) Funds for the wealthy and the politically loyal? How EU funds may contribute to increasing regional disparities in East Central Europe. In: BachtlerJBerkowitzPHardyS, et al. (eds) EU Cohesion Policy. Reassessing Performance and Direction.
London:
Routledge, pp.220–240.
50.
Medve-BálintG (2018)
The cohesion policy on the EU’s eastern and southern periphery: Misallocated funds?Studies in Comparative International Development53(2): 218–238.
51.
MilliganKSSmartM (2005) Regional Grants as Pork Barrel Politics. ID 710903, SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=710903 (accessed 30 May 2017).
52.
MuraközyBTelegdyÁ (2016)
Political incentives and state subsidy allocation: Evidence from Hungarian municipalities.European Economic Review89: 324–344.
53.
NadeauRLewis-BeckMS (2001)
National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections.The Journal of Politics63(1): 159–181.
54.
NicolescuCGorceaA (2005) Approaches to local representation in Poland, Estonia, and Bulgaria. In: SoósGZentaiV (eds) Faces of Local Democracy. Comparative Papers from Central and Eastern Europe.
Budapest:
Open Society Institute, pp.207–242.
55.
PowellGBWhittenGD (1993)
A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context.American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
56.
SamuelsDJ (2002)
Pork barreling is not credit claiming or advertising: Campaign finance and the sources of the personal vote in Brazil.The Journal of Politics64(3): 845–863.
57.
SteinRMBickersKN (1994)
Congressional elections and the pork barrel.The Journal of Politics56(2): 377–399.
58.
StratmannTBaurM (2002)
Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German Bundestag: How incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems.American Journal of Political Science46(3): 506–514.
59.
TarrowS (1977) Between Center and Periphery: Grassroots Politicians in Italy.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
60.
VeigaLGVeigaFJ (2013)
Intergovernmental fiscal transfers as pork barrel.Public Choice155(3–4): 335–353.
61.
WhittenGDPalmerHD (1999)
Cross-national analyses of economic voting.Electoral Studies18(1): 49–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
