This article presents a new dataset of pledges made by Europarties during the 2004 and 2009 European Parliament elections, as well as pre-legislative priorities of the European Commission following these elections. The data cover two legislative cycles in the period 2004–2013. The article discusses the rationale behind the development of this dataset, the coding, and the measurement of the variables, and it highlights the applicability of these data.
AlexandrovaPCarammiaMPrincenSet al.(2014) Measuring the European Council agenda: Introducing a new approach and dataset. European Union Politics15(1): 152–167.
2.
ArtésJ (2013) Do Spanish politicians keep their promises?Party Politics19(1): 143–158.
3.
BacheI (2013) Measuring quality of life for public policy: An idea whose time has come? Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy20(1): 21–38.
4.
BailerS (2014) An agent dependent on the EU member states? The determinants of the European Commission’s legislative success in the European Union. Journal of European Integration36(1): 37–53.
5.
BarrosoJ (2009) Political Guidelines for the Next Commission, Brussels, Belgium: The European Commission.
6.
BocquillonPDobbelsM (2014) An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting. Journal of European Public Policy21(1): 20–38.
7.
CarterN (2010) The Greens in the 2009 European Parliament election. Environmental Politics19(2): 295–302.
8.
ChristiansenT (2001) Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: Towards coherent governance?Journal of European Public Policy8(5): 747–769.
9.
CostelloRThomsonR (2008) Election pledges and their enactment in coalition governments: A comparative analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18(3): 239–256.
DayS (2014) Between ‘Containment’ and ‘Transnationalization’–Where next for the Europarties?Acta Politica49(1): 5–29.
12.
EgebergMGornitzkaÅTrondalJ (2014) A not so technocratic executive? Everyday interaction between the European Parliament and the Commission. West European Politics37(1): 1–18.
13.
FollesdalAHixS (2006) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies44(3): 533–562.
14.
Hage F (2016) Political attention in the Council of the European Union: A new dataset of working party meetings, 1995–2014. European Union Politics 17(4): 683–703.
15.
HaverlandMDe RuiterMDe WalleSV (2016) Agenda-setting by the European Commission. Seeking public opinion?Journal of European Public Policy0(0): 1–19.
16.
HertnerI (2011) Are European Election Campaigns Europeanized? The case of the Party of European Socialists in 2009. Government and Opposition46(3): 321–344.
17.
Hix S (2004) Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament. World Politics 56(2): 194–223.
18.
HoboltSBSpoonJ-J (2012) Motivating the European voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research51(6): 701–727.
19.
KassimHPetersonJBauerMet al.(2013) The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century, Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
KlingemannH-DHofferbertRIBudgeI (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
KostadinovaP (2013) Democratic performance in post-communist Bulgaria: Election pledges and levels of fulfillment, 1997–2005. East European Politics29(2): 190–207.
22.
KreppelAOztasB (2017) Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies50(8): 1118–1150.
23.
KrippendorffK (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 1st ed. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
24.
LordC (2002) What role for Parties in EU Politics?Journal of European Integration24(1): 39–52.
25.
ManserghLThomsonR (2007) Election pledges, party competition, and policymaking. Comparative Politics39(3): 311–329.
26.
MouryC (2011) Italian coalitions and electoral promises: Assessing the democratic performance of the Prodi I and Berlusconi II governments. Modern Italy16(1): 35–50.
27.
Naurin E (2011) Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. London, UK: Palgrave Macmilan.
28.
OsnabrüggeM (2015) The European Commission and the implementation of its legislative programme. European Union Politics16(2): 241–261.
29.
PollackMA (1997) Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization51(1): 99–134.
30.
PrincenS (2007) Agenda-setting in the European Union: A theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European Public Policy14(1): 21–38.
31.
RasmussenA (2007) Challenging the Commission’s right of initiative? Conditions for institutional change and stability. West European Politics30(2): 244–264.
32.
Riffe D, Lacy S and Fico F (2005) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
33.
RosénG (2016) A match made in heaven? Explaining patterns of cooperation between the Commission and the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration38(4): 409–424.
34.
Royed T (1996) Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science 26(1): 45–80.
35.
SchermannKEnnser-JedenastikL (2014) Explaining coalition-bargaining outcomes: Evidence from Austria, 2002–2008. Party Politics20(5): 791–801.
36.
StaceyJ (2003) Displacement of the Council via informal dynamics? Comparing the Commission and Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy10(6): 936–955.
37.
ThomsonR (2001) The programme to policy linkage: The fulfilment of election pledges on socio–economic policy in The Netherlands, 1986–1998. European Journal of Political Research40(2): 171–197.
38.
Thomson R (2008) National Actors in International Organization: The Case of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies 41(2): 169–192.
39.
ThomsonRHosliM (2006) Who has power in the EU? The Commission, Council and Parliament in legislative decision-making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies44(2): 391–417.
40.
ThomsonRRoyedTNaurinEet al.(2017) The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science61(3): 527–542.
41.
TorosE (2015) Piecrust promises: An analysis of the Turkish political parties’ electoral pledges. Turkish Studies16(2): 240–252.
42.
Wagner M (2011) The Right in the European Parliament since 1979. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12(1): 52–67.
43.
Wille A (2010) PoliticalBureaucratic Accountability in the EU Commission: Modernising the Executive. West European Politics 33(5): 1093–1116.
44.
Wonka A (2007) Technocratic and independent? The appointment of European Commissioners and its policy implications. Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 169–189.
