Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article asks to what extent the European Commission’s use of consultation depends on policy characteristics of the proposal being formulated. It examines all consultations organized during a formulation process and looks at the number of open consultations (online consultations) as well as the number of repeat consultations (expert groups, policy fora) by the total number of consultations. Three types of use of consultation are conceptualized. A multinomial logistic regression is performed on a cross-sectional sample of 150 policy proposals adopted between 2010 and 2014. Data are triangulated from official documents. The empirical analysis indicates that the Commission’s use of consultation depends on the complexity, newness, and salience of a proposal. These findings are also discussed in view of the 2015 reform of Better Regulation.

Keywords

Bureaucratic politics consultation European Commission policy formulation rational choice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2001) Institutions, path dependence, and democratic consolidation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(3): 249–269.

Bouwen

(2009) The European Commission. In: Coen

Richardson

(eds) Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–38.

Broscheid A and Coen D (2007) Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: Empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 346–365.

Bunea

(2013) Issues, preferences and ties: Determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 20(4): 552–570.

Bunea

(2017) Designing stakeholder consultations: Reinforcing or alleviating bias in the European Union system of governance? European Journal of Political Research 56(1): 46–69.

Bunea

Thomson

(2015) Consultations with interest groups and the empowerment of executives: Evidence from the European Union. Governance 28(4): 517–531.

Chalmers

(2014) In over their heads: Public consultation, administrative capacity and legislative duration in the European Union. European Union Politics 15(4): 595–613.

Chalmers

Davies

Monti

(2010) European Union Law: Cases and Materials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Delreux

Happaerts

(2016) Environmental Policy and Politics in the European Union, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

10.

Gornitzka

Sverdrup

(2008) Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics 31(4): 725–750.

11.

Hall

(1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–296.

12.

Hartlapp

Metz

Rauh

(2014) Which Policy for Europe?: Power and Conflict Inside the European Commission, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Klüver

(2011) The contextual nature of lobbying: Explaining lobbying success in the European Union. European Union Politics 12(4): 483–506.

14.

Klüver

(2013) Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Klüver

Braun

Beyers

(2015) Legislative lobbying in context: Towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 447–461.

16.

McFadden

(1979) Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behaviour on individuals: Some recent developments. In: Hensher

Stopher

(eds) Behavioural Travel Modelling, London: Croom Helm, pp. 279–318.

17.

Mahoney

(2008) Brussels Versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

18.

Majone G (1996) Regulating Europe. New York: Routledge.

19.

March

Olsen

(1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, NY: The Free Press.

20.

Metz

(2015) The European Commission, Expert Groups, and the Policy Process: Demystifying Technocratic Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

21.

Neshkova

(2014) Salience and complexity in supranational policymaking: The case of subnational interests. Governance 27(1): 9–36.

22.

North

(1990) A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(4): 355–367.

23.

Oppermann

de Vries

(2011) Analyzing issue salience in international politics. Theoretical foundations and methodological approaches. In: Oppermann

Viehrig

(eds) Issue Salience in International Politics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3–22.

24.

Pierson

(2000) The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance 13(4): 475–499.

25.

Princen

(2011) Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927–943.

26.

Quittkat

(2011) The European Commission’s online consultations: A success story? Journal of Common Market Studies 49(3): 653–674.

27.

Quittkat

Finke

(2008) The EU Commission consultation regime. In: Kohler-Koch

De Bièvre

Maloney

(eds) Opening EU-Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges, Mannheim: University of Mannheim, pp. 183–222.

28.

Radaelli

Meuwese

ACM

(2010) Hard questions, hard solutions: Proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU. West European Politics 33(1): 136–153.

29.

Rasmussen

Toshkov

(2013) The effect of stakeholder involvement on legislative duration: Consultation of external actors and legislative duration in the European Union. European Union Politics 14(3): 366–387.

30.

Rasmussen

(2015) The battle for influence: The politics of business lobbying in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 53(2): 365–382.

31.

Reh

Héritier

Bressanelli

et al. (2013) The informal politics of legislation. Comparative Political Studies 46(9): 1112–1142.

32.

Steinberger

Pouliquen

Hagman

(2002) Cross-lingual document similarity calculation using the multilingual thesaurus EUROVOC. In: Gelbukh

(ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Berlin: Springer, pp. 415–424.

33.

Van Ballaert

(2015) The politics behind the consultation of expert groups: An instrument to reduce uncertainty or a strategy to offset salience? Politics and Governance 3(1): 139–150.

34.

Warntjen

(2012) Measuring salience in EU legislative politics. European Union Politics 13(1): 168–182.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB

0.10 MB

0.02 MB

The European Commission’s use of consultation during policy formulation: The effects of policy characteristics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material