The European Commission has proposed a refugee distribution key, which yields respective quotas for European Union/European Free Trade Association member states. It is based on four quantities: GDP, population, asylum applications per capita in the past, and unemployment rates. I show that the given distribution key has properties which contradict the European Commission’s intentions. Exemplarily, states with low (high) unemployment may experience a lower (higher) quota when unemployment is taken into account compared to when it is not. These deviations are single-digit percentages. As a remedy, I propose an alternative distribution key, which avoids the undesired properties. It is modeled in the spirit of the European Commission’s proposal and is based on the same four quantities. Deviations between the two distribution keys are up to two-digit percentages.
BovensLChatkuptCSmeadL (2012) Measuring common standards and equal responsibility-sharing in EU asylum outcome data. European Union Politics13(1): 70–93.
4.
CzaikaM (2005) A refugee burden index: Methodology and its application. Migration Letters2(2): 101–125.
5.
European Commission (2015a) Addressing the refugee crisis in Europe: The role of EU external action. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council JOIN(2015) 40 final. Brussels: European Commission.
6.
European Commission (2015b) COM(2015) 450 final. 2015/0208 (COD). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels: European Commission.
7.
European Commission (2015c) COM(2015) 451. 2015/0209 (NLE). Proposal for a Council Decision Establishing Provisional Measures in the Area of International Protection for the Benefit of Italy, Greece and Hungary. Brussels: European Commission.
8.
European Commission (2015d) Refugee crisis: European Commission takes decisive action – Questions and answers. Press Release. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-5597_en.htm (accessed 11 November 2015).
Langenegger TW and Ambühl M (2015) Negotiation engineering: A structured problem-solving approach to negotiation. ETH Zurich: Negotiation and Conflict Management Research Paper 15 (01) Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2685871 (accessed 12 November 2015).
20.
NeumayerE (2004) Asylum destination choice: What makes some West European countries more attractive than others?European Union Politics5(2): 155–180.
21.
NeumayerE (2005) Asylum recognition rates in Western Europe: Their determinants, variation, and lack of convergence. Journal of Conflict Resolution49(1): 43–66.
Schuck PH (2013) Refugee burden-sharing: A modest proposal, fifteen years later. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2330380 (accessed 20 November 2015).
25.
SuhrkeA (1998) Burden-sharing during refugee emergencies: The logic of collective versus national action. Journal of Refugee Studies11(4): 396–415.
26.
Thielemann E (2012) Burden-sharing. In: Jones E, Menon A and Weatherill S (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.810–824.
ThielemannER (2003) Between interests and norms: Explaining burden-sharing in the European Union. Journal of Refugee Studies16(3): 253–273.
30.
Thomson R, Stockman FN, Achen CH, et al. (eds) (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
ToshkovDde HaanL (2013) The Europeanization of asylum policy: An assessment of the EU impact on asylum applications and recognitions rates. Journal of European Public Policy20(5): 661–683.
32.
ToshkovDD (2014) The dynamic relationship between asylum applications and recognition rates in Europe (1987–2010). European Union Politics15(2): 192–214.
33.
VinkMMeijerinkF (2003) Asylum applications and recognition rates in EU member states 1982–2001: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Refugee Studies16(3): 297–315.
34.
WallaceHPollackMAYoungAR (2010) Policy-Making in the European Union, 6th ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
