Studies assessing citizens’ attitudes towards Europe have mostly used explicit concepts and measures. However, psychologists have shown that human behaviour is not only determined by explicit attitudes which can be assessed via self-report, but also by implicit attitudes which require indirect measurement. We combine a self-report questionnaire with an implicit Affective Misattribution Procedure for the first time in an online environment to estimate the reliability, validity and predictive power of this implicit measure for the explanation of European Union-skeptical behaviour. Based on a survey with a sample representative for Germany, we found evidence for good reliability and validity of the implicit measure. In addition, the implicit attitude had a significant incremental impact beyond explicit attitudes on citizens’ proneness to engage in EU-skeptical information and voting behaviour.
AlbertsonBL (2011) Religious appeals and implicit attitudes. Political Psychology32(1): 109–130.
2.
ArcuriLCastelliLGaldiS (2008) Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology29(3): 369–387.
3.
Bar-AnanYNosekBA (2012) Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38(9): 1194–1208.
4.
BoomgaardenHGSchuckARTElenbaasM (2011) Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics12(2): 241–266.
5.
BurdeinILodgeMTaberC (2006) Experiments on the automaticity of political beliefs and attitudes. Political Psychology27(3): 359–371.
6.
ChaikenSTropeY (1999) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York: Guilford Press.
7.
DebusM (2009) Pre-electoral commitments and government formation. Public Choice138(1/2): 45–64.
8.
DeutschRStrackF (2010) Building blocks of social behavior: Reflective and impulsive processes. In: GawronskiBPayneBK (eds) Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications, New York: Guilford Publications, pp. 62–79.
9.
DitontoTMLauRRSearsDO (2013) AMPing racial attitudes: Comparing the power of explicit and implicit racism measures in 2008. Political Psychology34(4): 487–510.
EvansJS (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology59(1): 255–278.
12.
FrieseMBluemkeMWaenkeM (2007) Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures. Experimental Psychology (formerly “Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie”)54(4): 247–255.
13.
FrieseMHofmannWSchmittM (2008) When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology19(1): 285–338.
14.
FrieseMSmithCTPlischkeT (2012) Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?PLoS ONE7(8): e44130.
GarryJ (2014) Emotions and voting in EU referendums. European Union Politics15(2): 235–254.
17.
GawronskiBDe HouwerJ (2012) Implicit Measures in Social and Personality Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GawronskiBGaldiSArcuriL (2015) What can political psychology learn from implicit measures? Empirical evidence and new directions. Political Psychology36(1): 1–17.
19.
GawronskiBPayneBK (2010) Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications: Measurement, Theory, and Applications, New York: Guilford Press.
20.
GawronskiBWaltherE (2008) The TAR effect: When the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin34(9): 1276–1289.
21.
GawronskiBYangY (2015) What drives priming effects in the affect misattribution procedure?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin49(1): 3–15.
22.
GreenwaldAGBanajiMR (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review102(1): 4–27.
23.
GreenwaldAGMcGheeDESchwartzJLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(6): 1464–1480.
24.
GreenwaldAGNosekBABanajiMR (2003) Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(2): 197–216.
25.
HaidtJ (2003) The moral emotions. In: DavidsonRJSchererKRGoldsmithHH (eds) Handbook of Affective Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 852–870.
26.
HofmannW (2005) A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(10): 1369–1385.
27.
HofmannWBaumertA (2010) Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition & Emotion24(3): 522–535.
28.
HofmannWFrieseMRoefsA (2009) Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(2): 431–435.
29.
HofmannWGschwendnerTNosekBA (2005) What moderates implicit—Explicit consistency?European Review of Social Psychology16(1): 335–390.
30.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
31.
LangPJBradleyMMCuthbertBN (2008) International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual, Gainesville: University of Florida.
32.
LearyMRKowalskiRM (1990) Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin107(1): 34–47.
33.
LodgeMTaberCS (2005) The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology26(3): 455–482.
34.
MaierMAdamSMaierJ (2012) The impact of identity and economic cues on citizens’ EU support: An experimental study on the effects of party communication in the run-up to the 2009 European parliament elections. European Union Politics13(4): 580–603.
35.
MillerKPBrewerMBArbuckleNL (2009) Social identity complexity: Its correlates and antecedents. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations12(1): 79–94.
36.
Murphy ST and Zajonc RB (1993) Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optiomal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 723–739.
37.
NosekBA (2005) Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology134(4): 565–584.
38.
NosekBA (2007) Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science16(2): 65–69.
39.
OikawaMAartsHOikawaH (2011) There is a fire burning in my heart: The role of causal attribution in affect transfer. Cognition & Emotion25(1): 156–163.
40.
PaulhusDL (1984) Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(3): 598–609.
41.
PayneBKChengCMGovorunO (2005) An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(3): 277–293.
42.
PayneBKGovorunOArbuckleNL (2008) Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking?Cognition & Emotion22(2): 238–271.
43.
PayneBKKrosnickJAPasekJ (2010) Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46(2): 367–374.
44.
PayneBKMcClernonFJDobbinsIG (2007) Automatic affective responses to smoking cues. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology15(4): 400–409.
45.
RoccatoMZogmaisterC (2010) Predicting the vote through implicit and explicit attitudes: A field research. Political Psychology31(2): 249–274.
46.
RudmanLAAshmoreRDGaryML (2001) “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81(5): 856–868.
47.
RydellRJMcConnellARMackieDM (2008) Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes: Cognitive dissonance and increased information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(6): 1526–1532.
48.
SchmukleSC (2005) Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality19(7): 595–605.
49.
SmithERDeCosterJ (2000) Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review4(2): 108–131.
50.
StrackFDeutschR (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review8(3): 220–247.
51.
ThissenDWainerH (2001) Test scoring, Mahwah: L. Erlbaum Associates.
52.
Van SpanjeJDe VreeseC (2011) So what’s wrong with the EU? Motivations underlying the Eurosceptic vote in the 2009 European elections. European Union Politics12(3): 405–429.
53.
ZinkernagelAHoffmannWGerstenbergF (2013) On the road to the unconscious self: Understanding when people gain self-knowledge of implicit disgust sensitivity from behavioural cues. European Journal of Personality27(4): 355–376.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
