Research on member states’ compliance with European Union legislation often focuses on the timing of self-reported implementation measures. It is generally assumed that the earlier a member state adopts an implementation measure the more compliant it is. This is problematic because early measures may only partially address the goals of a European Union directive. We study whether and when reporting national legislation to signal directive implementation is associated with detected non-compliance by the European Commission. We find that unless facing strong reputational costs, member states often do report pre-existing measures of low fit to a given directive without making timely adjustments. Indicating compliance problems, this generally leads to the European Commission opening infringement cases.
ArreguiJStokmanFThomsonR (2004) Bargaining in the European Union and shifts in actors’ policy positions. European Union Politics5(1): 47–72.
2.
Bakker R, de Vries C, Edwards E, et al. (forthcoming) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 29 November 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812462931.
3.
BerglundSGangeIVan WaardenF (2006) Mass production of law. routinization in the transposition of European directives: A sociological–institutionalist account. Journal of European Public Policy13(5): 692–716.
4.
BörzelTA (2001) Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical artefact?Journal of European Public Policy8(5): 803–824.
5.
BörzelTA (2002) Member state responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies40: 193–214.
CrawfordVPSobelJ (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society50(6): 1431–1451.
8.
Döring H and Manow P (2010) Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov). An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies. Version 10/11, 6 November 2010. Available at: http://parlgov.org/.
FalknerGHartlappMTreibO (2007) Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only ‘sometimes-true theories’. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 395–416.
13.
GneezyU (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review95: 384–394.
14.
HartlappMFalknerG (2009) Problems of operationalization and data in EU compliance research. European Union Politics10(2): 281–304.
15.
HaverlandMSteunenbergBVan WaardenF (2011) Sectors at different speeds: Analysing transposition deficits in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies49(2): 265–291.
16.
HéritierA (1996) The accommodation of diversity in European policy-making and its outcomes: Regulatory policy as a patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy3(2): 149–176.
17.
KaedingM (2006) Determinants of transposition delay in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy26(3): 229–253.
18.
Kaufmann D, Kraai A and Mastruzzi M (2010) Governance Matters. Governance Indicators for 2004–2009. The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project. World Bank. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/resources.htm.
19.
KnillCTosunJ (2009) Post-accession transposition of EU law in the new member states: A cross-country comparison. European Integration Online Papers13(2): 1–18.
20.
KönigTLuetgertB (2009) Troubles with transposition? Explaining trends in member-state notification and the delayed transposition of EU directives. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 163–194.
21.
KönigTMäderL (2013) Non-conformable, partial and conformable transposition: A competing risk analysis of the transposition process of directives in the EU15. European Union Politics14(1): 46–69.
22.
KönigTMäderL (2014) The strategic nature of compliance: An empirical evaluation of law implementation in the central monitoring system of the European Union. American Journal of Political Science58(1): 246–263.
23.
LinosK (2007) How can international organizations shape national welfare states? Evidence from compliance with European Union directives. Comparative Political Studies40: 547–570.
24.
LongJS (1997) Repression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
LuetgertBDannwolfT (2009) Mixing methods: A nested analysis of EU member state transposition patterns. European Union Politics10(3): 307–334.
26.
MastenbroekE (2003) Surviving the Deadline: The Transposition of EU Directives in the Netherlands. European Union Politics4(4): 371–395.
27.
SedelmeierU (2008) After conditionality: Post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe. Journal of European Public Policy15(6): 806–825.
28.
SteunenbergBToshkovD (2009) Comparing transposition in the 27 member states of the EU: The impact of discretion and legal fit. Journal of European Public Policy16(7): 951–970.
29.
TallbergJ (2002) Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization56(3): 609–643.
30.
ThomsonR (2009) Same effects in different worlds: The transposition of EU directives. Journal of European Public Policy16(1): 1–18.
31.
ThomsonRBoerefijnJStokmanF (2004) Actor alignments in European Union decision making. European Journal of Political Research43(2): 237–261.
32.
ThomsonRStokmanFAchenCKönigT (2006) The European Union Decides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ThomsonRTorenvliedRArreguiJ (2007) The paradox of compliance: Infringements and delays in transposing European Union directives. British Journal of Political Science37(4): 685–709.
34.
ToshkovD (2008) Embracing European law: Compliance with EU directives in Central and Eastern Europe. European Union Politics9(3): 379–402.
35.
Yordanova N and Zhelyazkova A (2011) Reversed economic left-right party ideology? Transposition of EU legislation in Eastern vs. Western Europe. In: EUSA Twelfth Biennial Conference, Boston, 3–5 March 2011. Available at: http://www.euce.org/eusa/2011/papers/3h_yordanova.pdf.
36.
ZhelyazkovaA (2013) Complying with EU directives’ requirements: The link between EU decision-making and the correct transposition of EU provisions. Journal of European Public Policy20(5): 702–721.
37.
ZhelyazkovaATorenvliedR (2009) The time-dependent effect of conflict in the council on delays in the transposition of EU directives. European Union Politics10(1): 35–62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
