AchenCH (2006a) Evaluating political decision-making models. In: ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264–298.
2.
AchenCH (2006b) Institutional realism and bargaining models. In: ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–123.
3.
BailerS (2004) Bargaining success in the European Union. European Union Politics5(1): 99–123.
4.
BailerS (2011) Structural, domestic, and strategic interests in the European Union: Negotiation positions in the Council of Ministers. Negotiation Journal27(4): 447–475.
5.
Bueno de MesquitaB (2004) Decision-making models, rigor and new puzzles. European Union Politics5(1): 125–138.
6.
Bueno de MesquitaBStokmanFN (eds) (1994) European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications, and Comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
GolubJ (2012) Cheap dates and the delusion of gratification: Are votes sold or traded in the EU Council of Ministers?. Journal of European Public Policy19(2): 141–160.
HeisenbergD (2008) How should we best study the Council of Ministers?. In: NaurinDWallaceH (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union.. Games Governments Play in Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 261–276.
10.
HörlBWarntjenAWonkaA (2005) Built on a quicksand? A decade of procedural spatial models on EU legislative decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy12(3): 592–606.
11.
JohnS (2008) Decision-making processes within the European Union – Diverse ways of analysis. European Political Economy Review8: 105–117.
12.
JungeDKönigT (2007) What’s wrong with EU spatial analysis? The accuracy and robustness of empirical applications to the interpretation of the legislative process and the specification of preferences. Journal of Theoretical Politics19(4): 465–487.
13.
KaedingMSelckTJ (2005) Mapping out political Europe: Coalition patterns in EU decision-making. International Political Science Review26(3): 271–290.
14.
KönigT (2005) The unit of analysis, the nature of policy spaces and the model approach. Journal of Theoretical Politics17(3): 363–369.
15.
MattilaMLaneJE (2001) Why unanimity in the Council? A roll call analysis of Council voting. European Union Politics2(1): 31–52.
16.
MiklinE (2009) Government positions on the EU Services Directive in the Council: National interests or individual ideological preferences?. West European Politics32(5): 943–962.
17.
PahreR (2005) Formal theory and case-study methods in EU studies. European Union Politics6(1): 113–146.
18.
PierceR (1994) Introduction: Fresh perspectives on a developing institution. In: Bueno de MesquitaBStokmanFN (eds) European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications, and Comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 1–16.
19.
SchalkJTorenvliedRWeesieJStokmanFN (2007) The power of the presidency in EU Council decision-making. European Union Politics8(2): 229–250.
20.
SchneiderG (2008) Neither Goethe nor Bismarck: On the link between theory and empirics in Council decision making. In: NaurinDWallaceH (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 277–289.
21.
SchneiderGFinkeDBailerS (2010) Bargaining power in the European Union: An evaluation of competing game-theoretic models. Political Studies58(1): 85–103.
22.
SelckTJKuipersS (2005) Shared hesitance, joint success: Denmark, Finland, and Sweden in the European Union policy process. Journal of European Public Policy12(1): 157–176.
23.
StokmanFNThomsonR (2004) Winners and losers in the European Union. European Union Politics5(1): 5–23.
24.
SullivanJSelckTJ (2007) Political preferences, revealed positions and strategic votes: Explaining decision-making in the EU Council. Journal of European Public Policy14(7): 1150–1161.
25.
ThomsonR (2008) The Council presidency in the European Union: Responsibility with power. Journal of Common Market Studies46(3): 593–617.
26.
ThomsonR (2009) Actor alignments in the European Union before and after enlargement. European Journal of Political Research48(6): 756–781.
27.
ThomsonR (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making Before and After Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
ThomsonRStokmanFN (2006) Research design. In: ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–53.
29.
ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
WarntjenA (2008) The Council presidency. European Union Politics9(3): 315–338.
31.
WarntjenA (2012) Measuring salience in EU legislative politics. European Union Politics13(1): 168–182.
32.
ZimmerCSchneiderGDobbinsM (2005) The contested Council: Conflict dimensions of an intergovernmental EU institution. Political Studies53(2): 403–422.