The development towards a ‘Europe of the Regions’ is accompanied by a complex system of cooperation and interdependence between the different levels of policy-making. In this article, we ask how European integration affects the party composition of regional governments. We argue that the European Union (EU) classification system of regions — the ‘Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics’ (NUTS) — establishes incentives to form similar coalition governments among regions that belong to the same NUTS area. We test our argument by analysing government formation in the Czech regions and thus in one EU member state whose regions benefit financially from EU structural policy. The results show that there is empirical evidence to support our main hypotheses: even when controlling for variables that reflect standard coalition theories and for patterns of party competition in the national sphere, we find that coalitions are more likely to form if the respective parties are also part of the government in the regions that belong to the same NUTS area.
Bäck H. ( 2003) Explaining and predicting coalition outcomes: Conclusions from studying data on local coalitions. European Journal of Political Research42(4): 441-472.
2.
Bäck H. and Dumont P. ( 2008) Making the first move. A two-stage analysis of the role of formateurs in parliamentary government formation. Public Choice135(3-4): 353-373.
3.
Bäck H., Debus M., Müller J., et al. (2010) Regional government formation in varying multilevel contexts. A comparison of eight European countries. Towards a Regional Political Science Workshop, Edinburgh .
4.
Bauer M. and Pitschel D. ( 2009) Subnational governance approaches on the rise - Reviewing a decade of Eastern European regionalisation research. Regional & Federal Studies19(4): 327-347.
5.
Benoit K. and Laver M. ( 2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
6.
Benz A. and Eberlein B. ( 1999) The Europeanization of regional politics: Patterns of multilevel governance. Journal of European Public Policy6(2): 329-348.
7.
Boldrin M. and Canova F. ( 2001) Inequality and convergence in Europe’s regions: Reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy32(16): 205-253.
8.
Bräuninger T. and Debus M. ( 2008) Der Einfluss von Koalitionsaussagen, Programmatischen Standpunkten und der Bundespolitik auf die Regierungspolitik in den deutschen Ländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift49(2): 309-338.
9.
Bräuninger T. and König T. ( 1999) The checks and balances of party federalism. German federal government in a divided legislature. European Journal of Political Research36(2): 207-235.
10.
Bueno de Mesquita B., Smith A., Siverson RM, et al. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
11.
Bulmer S., Bruch M., Hogwood P., et al. (2006) UK devolution in the European Union: A tale of cooperative asymmetry? Publius: The Journal of Federalism36(1): 75-93.
12.
Cappelen A., Castellacci F., Fagerberg J., et al. (2003) The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in theEuropean Union. Journal of Common Market Studies41(4): 621-644.
13.
Carey JM ( 2007) Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science51(1): 92-107.
14.
Charvatova D. and Charvat Z. ( 2009) The importance and use of European structural funds in the Czech Republic. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology49: 465-471.
15.
ČSSD [Czech Social Democratic Party] ( 2004) Volební program pro volby do regionálního zastoupení Jihomoravského Kraje [Election programme for the elections to the regional assembly in the South Moravian Region]. Brno: Czech Social Democratic Party.
16.
Däubler T. and Debus M. ( 2009) Government formation and policy formulation in the German states. Regional & Federal Studies19(1): 73-95.
17.
Debus M. ( 2009) Pre-electoral commitments and government formation. Public Choice138(1-2): 45-64.
18.
Denters B. ( 1985) Towards a conditional model of coalition behaviour. European Journal of Political Research13(3): 295-309.
19.
Deschouwer K. ( 2006) Political parties as multi-level organizations. In: Katz RS and Crotty W (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, 291-300.
20.
Detterbeck K. and Hepburn E. ( 2010) Party politics in multi-level systems: Party responses to new challenges in European democracies. In: Erk J and Swenden W (eds) New Directions in Federalism Research. London: Routledge, 106-125.
21.
Downs W. ( 1998) Coalition Government, Subnational Style - Multiparty Politics in European Regional Parliaments. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
22.
Ferry M. and McMaster I. ( 2005) Implementing structural funds in Polish and Czech regions: Convergence, variation, empowerment?Regional & Federal Studies15(1): 19-39.
23.
Franklin MN and Mackie TT ( 1983) Familiarity and inertia in the formation of governing coalitions in parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science13(3): 275-298.
24.
Gabal I. ( 2002) Analyza Spolupráce Nestátních Neziskovych Organizací a Veřejné Správy na Tvorbē Krajskych Rozvojovych Dokumentů, Případnē Dalších Dokumentu [Analysis of Cooperation of Nongovernmental Nonprofit Organisations and Regional Public Administrations in the Process of Formulation of Regional Development Documents and Other Additional Documents Relevant for the EU] . Prague: Gabal, Analysis & Consulting , URL (accessed 3 May 2011): http://www.vlada.cz/assets/ppov/rnno/publikace/gabalova_analyza.pdf.
25.
Gaines BJ and Crombez C. ( 2004) Another look at connections across German elections. Journal of Theoretical Politics16(3): 289-319.
26.
Geys B., Heyndels B. and Vermeir J. ( 2006) Explaining the formation of minimal coalitions: Anti-system parties and anti-pact rules. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 957-984.
27.
Goetz KH and Meyer-Sahling J. ( 2008) The EU timescape: From notion to research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy16(2): 180-201.
28.
Hlousek V. and Kopeček L. ( 2008) Cleavages in contemporary Czech and Slovak politics: Between persistence and change. East European Politics and Societies22(3): 518-552.
29.
Hooghe L. ( 1996) Building a Europe with the Regions: The Changing Role of the European Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2003) Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review97(2): 233-243.
31.
Hough D and Jeffery C (eds) (2006) Devolution and Electoral Politics . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32.
Illner M. ( 2002) Multilevel government in three East Central European candidate countries and its reforms after 1989. Unpublished paper, European University Institute, Florence.
33.
Jeffery C. ( 1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union: Towards a Third Level in Europe?London: Routledge.
34.
Jeffery C. ( 2008) The challenge of territorial politics. Policy & Politics36(4): 545-557.
35.
Jeffery C. ( 2009) New research agendas on regional party competition. Regional & Federal Studies19(4&5): 639-650.
36.
Jeffery C. and Wincott D. ( 2010) The challenge of territorial politics: Beyond methodological nationalism. In: Hay C (ed.) New Directions in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 167-188.
37.
Keating M. ( 1998) The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
38.
Keman H. ( 2008) The Low Countries. Confrontation and coalition in segmented societies. In: Colomer J (ed.) Political Institutions in Europe. London: Routledge.
39.
Klingemann H., Volkens A., Bara JL, et al. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
Knill C. ( 2001) The Europeanization of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Knill C. and Tosun J. ( 2009) Hierarchy, networks or markets: How does the EU shape environmental policy adoptions within and beyond its borders?Journal of European Public Policy16(6): 873-894.
42.
Kropp S. ( 2010) Kooperativer Föderalismus und Politikverflechtung . Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
43.
Kupsa M., Havlíková Z., Kořínek J., et al. (2006) SROP - úspēšná cesta k dotacím Evropské unie ve Středních Čechách (SROP - a successful way to European Union grants in Central Bohemia). Prague: Úřad regionální rady regionu soudržnosti Střední Cechy.
44.
Ladrech R. ( 2002) Europeanization and political parties: Towards a framework of analysis. Party Politics8(4): 389-403.
45.
LaPlant JT, Baun M., Lach J., et al. (2004) Decentralization in the Czech Republic: The European Union, political parties, and the creation of regional assemblies . Publius: The Journal of Federalism34(1): 35-51.
46.
Libbrecht L., Maddens B. and Swenden W. ( 2009) Issue salience in regional party manifestos in Spain. European Journal of Political Research48(1): 58-79.
47.
McElroy G. and Benoit K. ( 2010) Party policy and group affiliation in theEuropean Parliament. British Journal of Political Science40(2): 377-398.
48.
McFadden DL ( 1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour . In: Zarembka P (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105-142.
49.
Marks G., Hooghe L., Nelson M., et al. (2006) Party competition and European integration in the East and West: Different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155-175.
50.
Martin LW and Stevenson RT ( 2001) Government formation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science45(1): 33-50.
51.
Müller WC ( 2009) Government formation. In: Landmann T and Robinson N (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics. Los Angeles : Sage, 227-245.
52.
Novotny O. ( 2008) Les régions tchèques ont-elles une identité politique?Fédéralisme Régionalisme8(2), URL (accessed 3 May 2011): http://popups.ulg.ac.be/federalisme/document.php?id=761 .
53.
Novotny V. ( 2000) The European Union and the emergence of regional institutions in Czechia. Annual Conference of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies, Cambridge.
54.
ODS [Civic Democratic Party] (2008) Volební Program pro krajské volby [Election programme for regional elections]. Liberec.
55.
Pogorelis R., Maddens B., Swenden W., et al. (2005) Issue salience in regional and national party manifestos in the UK. West European Politics28(5): 992-1014.
56.
Powell GB ( 2004) The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy15(1): 91-105.
57.
Radaelli CM ( 2003) The Europeanization of public policy. In: Featherstone K and Radaelli CM (eds) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-56.
58.
Schimmelfennig F. ( 2009) Europeanization beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance4(3).
59.
Schimmelfennig F., Engert S. and Knobel H. ( 2003) Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies41(3): 495-518.
60.
Sedelmaier U. ( 2006) After conditionality: Post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe. Journal of European Public Policy15(6): 806-825.
61.
Snyder R. ( 2001) Scaling down: The subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development36(1): 93-110.
62.
Stefuriuc I. ( 2009) Explaining government formation in multi-level settings: Coalition theory revisited - evidence from the Spanish case. Regional & Federal Studies19(1): 97-116.
63.
Stegmaier M. and Vlachová K. ( 2009) The endurance of the Czech Communist Party. Politics & Policy37(4): 799-820.
64.
Strøm K. and Müller WC ( 1999) Political parties and hard choices. In: Strøm K and Müller WC (eds) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-35.
65.
Swenden W and Maddens B (eds) (2009) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
66.
Tsebelis G. ( 1999) Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review93(3): 591-608.
67.
Van Houten P. ( 2009) Multi-level relations in political parties: A delegation approach. Party Politics15(2): 137-156.
68.
Wüst AM ( 2009) Parties in European Parliament elections: Issues, framing, the EU and the question of supply and demand. German Politics18(3): 426-440.
69.
Zimmer C., Schneider G. and Dobbins M. ( 2005) The contested Council: The conflict dimensions of an intergovernmental EU institution. Political Studies53(2): 403-422.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
