Individuals self-categorize within an international context, and this supranational identity shapes expectations for their own political system. Those individuals in postCommunist countries who believe that their country’s primary international orientation should be towards the European Union have a more participatory view of politics and are more politically active. This study develops a social identity explanation of political behavior, and tests the explanation utilizing maximum likelihood and non-parametric matching methods in a 2004 survey of political attitudes in Moldova. Moldova’s patchwork of identities, mixed historical legacy, and salience of supranational association make it an excellent case for study. The analysis finds strong support for the effect of supranational identity across a wide range of attitudes and activities.
Abadie A. and Imbens G. ( 2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica74: 235-267.
2.
Almond GA and Verba S. ( 1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bendix R. ( 1978) Kings or People. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
4.
Boţan I. ( 2001) Razvitie Politiki Moldovy c 1991 Goda. Working Paper, Moldova State University.
5.
Brewer MB ( 1979) In-Group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychology Bulletin86(2): 307-324.
6.
Brewer MB ( 1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17: 475-482.
7.
Brewer MB ( 1999) The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate. Journal of Social Issues55(3): 429-444.
8.
Carey S. ( 2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration?European Union Politics3: 387-413.
9.
Chifu I., Nantoi O. and Shusko O. ( 2008) Securitate Societală în Regiunea Trilateralei Romănia-Ucraina-Republica Moldova. Bucharest: Editura Curtea Veche.
10.
Cichowski RA ( 2000) Western dreams, eastern realities: Support for the European union in central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies33(10): 1243-1278.
11.
Clunan AL ( 2009) The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Diamond A. and Sekhon JS ( 2005) Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects . Working Paper, UC Berkeley.
13.
Evans G. and Whitefield S. ( 2000) Explaining the Formation of Electoral Cleavages in PostCommunist Democracies. In: Klingemann H-D, Mochmann E and Newton K (eds) Elections in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
14.
Filali-Ansary A. ( 1999) Muslims and democracy. Journal of Democracy10: 18-32.
15.
Fukuyama F. ( 1995) Confucianism and democracy. Journal of Democracy6: 20-33.
16.
Fukuyama F. ( 2006) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ho D., Imai K., King G. and Stuart E. ( 2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis15: 199-236.
19.
Hogg MA ( 2006) Social Identity Theory. In: Burke P (ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press .
20.
Hogg MA and Abrams D. ( 1988) Social Identifications. London : Routledge.
21.
Hogg MA and Mullin BA ( 1999) Joining groups to reduce uncertainty. In: Abrams D and Hogg MA (eds) Social Identity and Social Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 249-279.
22.
Hooghe L. and Marks G. ( 2005) Calculation, community and cues. European Union Politics6: 419-443.
23.
Huntington SP ( 1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the New World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
24.
Hymans JEC ( 1997) Applying Social Identity Theory to the Study of International Politics. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA.
25.
Inglehart R. and Welzel C. ( 2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
26.
IPP [Institute for Public Policy] (2004) Barometer of Public Opinion. Available online: http://www.ipp.md/ (accessed 23 March 2006).
27.
IPP [Institute for Public Policy] (2009) Barometer of Public Opinion. Available online: http://www.ipp.md/ (accessed 2 February 2010).
28.
Kentman C. ( 2008) Determinants of support for EU membership in Turkey: Islamic attachments, utilitarian considerations and national identity. European Union Politics9: 487-510.
29.
King C. ( 2000) The Moldovans. Stanford, CA : Hoover Institution Press.
30.
King G., Honaker J., Joseph A. and Scheve K. ( 2001) Analyzing incomplete political science data. American Politicaal Science Review95(1): 49-69.
31.
Kitschelt H. ( 1992) The formation of party systems in East Central Europe . Political Sociology20(1): 7-50.
32.
Kopstein JS and Reilly DA ( 2000) Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics53(1): 1-37.
33.
Kurzban R., Tooby J. and Cosmides L. ( 2001) Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences98(26): 15387-15392.
34.
Larson DW and Shevchenko A. ( 2003) Shortcut to greatness: The new thinking and the revolution in soviet foreign policy. International Organization57(1): 77-109.
35.
Li Q. and Reuveny R. ( 2003) Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical analysis . British Journal of Political Science33(1): 29-54.
36.
Mercer J. ( 1995) Anarchy and Identity. International Organization49(2): 229-252.
37.
Meyer JW ( 1999) The changing cultural content of the nation-state: A world society perspective. In: Steinmetz G (ed.) State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
Meyer JW, Boli J., Thomas GM and Ramirez FO ( 1997) World society and the nation state. American Journal of Sociology103(1): 144-181.
39.
Mishler W. and Rose R. ( 1996) Trajectories of fear and hope: Support for democracy in postcommunist Europe. Comparative Political Studies28: 553-581.
40.
Mishler W. and Rose R. ( 1999) Five Years after the Fall: Trajectories of Support in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Norris P (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 78-102.
41.
Mishler W. and Rose R. ( 2001) Political support for incomplete democracies. International Political Science Review22(4): 303-320.
42.
Monroe KR ( 2008) Cracking the code of genocide. Political Psychology29(5): 699-736.
43.
Monroe KR and McDermott R. ( 2010) Nicole’s father Is NOT German! The immutability of differences and the social construction of their moral and political salience . PS43(1): 77-81.
44.
Monroe KR, Hankin J. and Van Vechten RB ( 2000) The psychological foundations of identity politics . Annual Review of Political Science3: 419-447.
45.
O’Donnell G. ( 1998) Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy9: 112-126.
46.
Patterson M. and Monroe KR ( 1998) Narrative in political science. Annual Review of Political Science1: 315-331.
47.
Putnam RD ( 1994) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
48.
Rohrschneider R. and Whitefield S. ( 2004) Support for foreign ownership and integration in Eastern Europe: Economic interests, ideological commitments, and democratic context . Comparative Political Studies37(3): 313-339.
49.
Rohrschneider R. and Whitefield S. ( 2006) Political parties, public opinion and European integration in post-communist countries: The state of the art. European Union Politics7(1): 141-160.
50.
Rueschemeyer D., Stephens EH and Stephens JD ( 1992) Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
51.
Schimmelfennig F. ( 2001) The Community Trap. International Organization55: 47-80.
52.
Schimmelfennig F. and Scholtz H. ( 2008) EU democracy promotion in the European Neighborhood: Political conditionality, economic development, and transnational exchange . European Union Politics9: 187-215.
53.
Sears DO ( 1993) Symbolic Politics: A Social Psychological Theory . In: Iyengar S and McGuire WJ (eds) Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 113-149.
54.
Sekhon JS ( 2004) Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization. Working Paper, UC Berkeley .
55.
Smirnov I. ( 2004) To Live in Our Land. Tiraspol, Pridnestrovia: ‘Tipar’ .
56.
Starr H. ( 1991) Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution35: 356-381.
57.
Stati V. ( 2009) Moldovane: Istoricheskoe i Etnopoliticheskoe Issledovanie . Chişinău, Moldova: Tipogr. Centrala.
58.
Strang D. and Meyer JW ( 1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society22(4): 487-511.
59.
Tajfel H. ( 1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American223: 96-102.
60.
Turner JC ( 1982) Toward a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group . In: Tajfel H (ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA and McGarty C. ( 1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20(5): 454-463.
62.
Way LA ( 2002) Pluralism by default in moldova. Journal of Democracy13(4): 127-141.
63.
White S., McAllister I., Light M. and Löwenhardt J. ( 2002) A European or a slavic choice? Europe-Asia Studies54(2): 181-202.
64.
Whitefield S. ( 2002) Political cleavages in post-communist politics . Annual Review of Political Science5: 181-200.
65.
Whitehead L. ( 1996) Three International Dimensions of Democratization . In: Whitehead L (ed.) The International Dimensions of Democratization. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 3-24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
