This article fills a gap in the literature by explaining list composition and placement of candidates in closed PR (proportional representation) settings. Focusing on the case of Romania in the European elections of June 2009, we rely on an original data set including the sociodemographics, career history and wealth of all 215 candidates from the Romanian parties’ parliamentary lists. The results of our rank-ordered logistic regression indicate that at both the national and the party level the political competitors favour previous political experience and wealth of the candidates in establishing their final list order. Marginal effects of support from successful local branches, gender, age and education are also visible for various political parties.
Bale T. and Taggart P. ( 2006) The newest of the new? accession state MEPs: Who they are and how they think they are. Paper presented to the Federal trust workshop on ‘The European Parliament and the European Political Space’, 30 March, London.
2.
Best H and Cotta M (eds) (2000) Parliamentary representatives in Europe, 1848- 2000. legislative recruitment and careers in eleven European countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bowler S. and Farrell DM ( 1993) Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships. Journal of common market studies31: 45-70.
4.
Chiru M. and Ciobanu I.(2009) Legislative recruitment and electoral system change: The case of Romania . CEU political science journal4(2): 192-231.
5.
Czudnowski M. ( 1975) Political recruitment. In: Greenstein FI and Polsby N (eds) Handbook of political science: Vol. 2, micropolitical theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Epstein LD ( 1980) Political parties in western democracies. New Brunswick, NJ: Praeger.
7.
Faas T. ( 2003) To defect or not to defect? national, institutional and party group pressures on MEPs and their consequences for party group cohesion in theEuropean parliament. European journal of political research42(6): 841-866.
8.
Farrell DM and Scully R. ( 2007) Representing Europe’s citizens? electoral institutions and the failure of parliamentary representation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9.
Gallagher M and Marsh M (eds) (1988) Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics. London: Sage.
10.
Gherghina S. ( 2009) Still waters run deep: Party organization and electoral stability in new democracies. Paper presented at the ECPR joint sessions, Lisbon, April.
11.
Hagemann S.(2009) Strength in numbers? an evaluation of the 2004-2009European parliament. EPC, issue paper59: 6-28.
12.
Hazan RY and Rahat G. ( 2006) The influence of candidate selection methods on legislatures and legislators: Theoretical propositions, methodological suggestions and empirical evidence. Journal of legislative studies12(3-4): 366-385.
13.
Hix S. ( 2004) Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: Explaining voting defection in theEuropean parliament. World politics56(1): 94-223.
14.
Hix S. and Hagemann S.(2009) Could changing the electoral rules fix European parliament elections ? Politique Européenne28: 27-41.
15.
Hix S. and Lord C. ( 1997) Political parties in the European union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
16.
Hix S., Raunio T. and Scully R. ( 2003) Fifty years on: Research on theEuropean parliament. Journal of common market studies41(2): 191-202.
17.
Heidar K. and Koole R. ( 2000) Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: Political parties behind closed doors. London: Routledge.
18.
Krašovec A. and Štremfel U. ( 2007) Does the institutional context matter for candidate selection? some evidence from Slovenia. Czech journal of political science3: 195-200.
19.
Kreppel A. ( 2002) The European parliament and supranational party system: A study in institutional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lundell K. ( 2004) Determinants of candidate selection. the degree of centralization in comparative perspective. Party politics10(1): 25-44.
21.
Linek L. and Outly J. ( 2006) Selection of candidates to the European parliament in the main Czech political parties. Contemporary European studies1: 5-31.
22.
Matthews DR ( 1985) Legislative recruitment and legislative careers. In: Loewenberg G, Patterson SC and Jewell ME (eds) Handbook of legislative research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Norris P (ed.) (1997) Passages to power: Legislative recruitment in advanced democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Norris P. ( 1999) Recruitment into the European parliament. In: Katz RS and Wessels B (eds) The European parliament, national parliaments and European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 86-104.
25.
Patzelt WJ ( 1999) Recruitment and retention in westernEuropean parliaments. Legislative studies quarterly24(2): 239-279.
26.
Reif K. and Schmitt H. ( 1980) Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European journal of political research8: 3-44.
27.
Ranney A. ( 1981) Candidate selection. In: Butler D, Penniman HR and Ranney A (eds) Democracy at the polls. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
28.
Raunio T. ( 2007) Open list, open mandate? links between MEPs and parties in Finland. Perspectives on European politics and societies8(2): 131-146.
29.
Realitatea.net (2009) PD-L a primit cele mai mari donaţii în bani în campania pentru europarlamentare, 29 May. URL (consulted July 2010): http://www.realitatea.net/pd-l-a-primit-cele-mai-mari-donatii-in-bani-in-campania-pentru-europarlamentare-_526712.html .
30.
Săptămâna Financiară online ( 2009) Cât câştigă sponsorii din umbra partidelor, 11 October. URL (consulted July 2010): http://www.sfin.ro/articol_17817/cat_castiga_sponsorii_din_umbra_partidelor.html .
31.
Sartori G. ( 1976) Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Scarrow SE ( 1997) Political career paths and theEuropean parliament. Legislative studies quarterly22(2): 253-263.
33.
Schattschneider EE ( 1942) Party government. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34.
Seligman LG, King MR, Chong LK and Smith RE ( 1974) Patterns of recruitment. a state chooses its lawmakers . Chicago: Rand McNally.
35.
Smilov D. and Toplak J. ( 2007) Political finance and corruption in eastern Europe: The transition period. Hampshire: Ashgate .
36.
Ştefan L. ( 2004) Patterns of political elite recruitment in post-communist Romania. Bucharest: Ziua Publishing House.
37.
Van Biezen I. and Kopecky P. ( 2007) The state and the parties: Public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies. Party politics13: 235-254.
38.
Verzichelli L. and Edinger M. ( 2005) A critical juncture? the 2004 European elections and the making of a supranational elite. Journal of legislative studies11(2): 254-274.
39.
Watson R. and Shackleton M. ( 2008) Organized interests and lobbying. In: Bomberg E and Stubb A (eds) The European union - how does it work?2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-115.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
