European compliance research has benefited greatly from both quantitative and qualitative studies. Scholars have raised our awareness of potential country, policy sector and Directive-specific compliance patterns, while drawing on very different samples of transposition and infringement data as well as institutional and preference-driven explanations for the observed trends. In our nested analysis of transposition timeliness across nine member states and 1192 directives, we critically assess the fit of our event history model as well as explicit patterns among countryvs. sector-specific trends. We then discuss the relative position of existing case studies within the larger sample based on their deviance and consider the extent to which member state transposition patterns can be generalized or remain individual, Directive-specific phenomena.
Axelrod, Robert ( 1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York : Basic Books.
2.
Axelrod, Robert and Robert O. Keohane ( 1985) ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics38(1): 226-54.
3.
Azzi, Giuseppe Ciavarini ( 2000) ‘The Slow March of European Legislation: The Implementation of Directives’, in Karlheinz Neunreither and Antje Wiener (eds) European Integration after Amsterdam, pp. 52-67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bäck, Hanna and Patrick Dumont ( 2007) ‘Combining Large-N and Small-N Strategies: The Way Forward in Coalition Research’, West European Politics30(3): 467-501.
5.
Bennett, Andrew ( 2002) ‘Where the Model Frequently Meets the Road: Combining Statistical, Formal, and Case Study Methods’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , 28 August 2002, Boston, Massachusetts.
6.
Berglund, Sara, Ieva Gange and Frans Van Waarden ( 2006) ‘Mass Production of Law. Routinization in the Transposition of European Directives: A Sociological Institutionalist Account’, Journal of European Public Policy13(5): 692-716.
7.
Borghetto, Enrico ( 2007) ‘The Respect of Transposition Deadlines in Italy: Do Political Priorities Matter?’, URGE Working Paper, Università di Milano.
8.
Borghetto, Enrico, Fabio Franchino and Daniela Giannetti ( 2006) ‘Complying with the Transposition Deadlines of EU Directives. Evidence from Italy’, Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche2(1): 7-38.
9.
Börzel, Tanja A. ( 2000) ‘Why There Is No "Southern Problem". On Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy7(1): 141-62.
10.
Börzel, Tanja A. ( 2003) Environmental Leaders and Laggards in Europe. Why There Is (Not) a ‘Southern Problem’Hampshire: Ashgate.
11.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Bradford S. Jones (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Brady, Henry E. and David Collier ( 2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards . Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield .
13.
Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara and Eric Tanenbaum ( 2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Bugdahn, Sonja ( 2005) ‘Of Europeanization and Domestication: The Implementation of the Environmental Information Directive in Ireland, Great Britain and Germany’ , Journal of European Public Policy12(1): 177-99.
15.
Chayes, Abram and Antonia Handler Chayes ( 1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Cleves, Mario, William Gould, Roberto Gutierrez and Yulia Marchenko ( 2008) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
17.
Coppedge, Michael ( 2005) ‘Explaining Democratic Deterioration in Venezuela through Nested Induction’, in Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring (eds) The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Advances and Setbacks , pp. 289-319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Dimitrakopoulos, Dionyssis ( 2001) ‘Learning and Steering: Changing Implementation Patterns and the Greek Central Government’, Journal of European Public Policy8(4): 604-22.
19.
Downs, George W., David M. Rocke and Peter N. Barsoom ( 1996) ‘Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?’, International Organization50(3): 379-406.
20.
Duina, Francesco ( 1997) ‘Explaining Legal Implementation in theEuropean Union’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law25(2): 155-79.
21.
Epstein, David and Sharyn O’Halloran ( 1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Falkner, Gerda ( 2007) ‘Time to Discuss: Data to Crunch or Problems to Solve? A Rejoinder to Robert Thomson’, West European Politics30(5): 1009-21.
23.
Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber and Oliver Treib ( 2004) ‘Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor’, West European Politics27(3): 452-73.
24.
Falkner, Gerda, Oliver Treib, Miriam Hartlapp and Simone Leiber ( 2005) Complying with Europe. EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Fearon, James and David Laitin ( 2005) ‘Civil War Narratives’, Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis. Working Paper Series, 27. University of California, Los Angeles.
26.
Franchino, Fabio ( 2007) The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Golub, Jonathan ( 2007) ‘Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-Making’ , European Union Politics8(2): 156-79.
28.
Greene, William H. ( 2008) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
29.
Guiliani, Marco ( 2004) ‘EU Compliance: Macro, Meso, or No Institution at All?’, URGE Working Paper, Research Unit on European Governance, Turin.
30.
Hamilton, Lawrence C. ( 1992) Regression with Graphics. Belmont: Duxbury Press.
31.
Haverland, Markus ( 2000) ‘National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points’, Journal of Public Policies20(1): 83-103.
32.
Haverland, Markus and Marleen H. Romeijn ( 2007) ‘Do Member States Make European Legislation Work? Analysing the EU Transposition Deficit’, Public Administration85(3): 757-78.
33.
Kaeding, Michael ( 2006) ‘Determinants of Transposition Delay in theEuropean Union’, Journal of Public Policy26(03): 229-53.
34.
Kaeding, Michael ( 2007) Better Regulation in the European Union: Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead?: The Transposition of EU Transport Directives across Member States. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
35.
Kaeding, Michael ( 2008) ‘Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead - the Transposition of EU Transport Directives across Member States’, European Union Politics9(1): 115-43.
36.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba ( 1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Knill, Christoph ( 1998) ‘European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions’, Journal of Public Policies18(1): 1-28.
38.
Knill, Christoph ( 2001) The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Knill, Christoph and Andrea Lenschow ( 1998) ‘Coping with Europe: The Impact of British and German Administrations on the Implementation of EU Environmental Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy5(4): 595-614.
40.
König, Thomas ( 2005) ‘Measuring and Analysing Positions on European Constitution-Building’ , European Union Politics6(3): 259-67.
41.
König, Thomas ( 2007a) ‘Discontinuity: Another Source of the EU’s Democratic Deficit?’, European Union Politics8(3): 411-32.
42.
König, Thomas ( 2007b) ‘Divergence or Convergence? From Ever-Growing to Ever-Slowing European Legislative Decision Making’, European Journal of Political Research46(3): 417-44.
43.
König, Thomas and Brooke Luetgert ( 2009) ‘Troubles with Transposition? Explaining Trends in Member-State Notification and the Delayed Transposition of EU Directives’ , British Journal of Political Science39(1): 163-94.
44.
König, Thomas and Lars Mäder ( 2007) Bürokratisierung Oder Politisierung? Eine Untersuchung der Umsetzungseffekte von Europäischen Richtlinien in den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union im Zeitraum von 1985-2003. Speyerer Forschungsberichte . Speyer: Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung.
45.
König, Thomas and Lars Mäder ( 2008) ‘Das Regieren Jenseits des Nationalstaates und der Mythos einer 80-Prozent-Europäisierung in Deutschland’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift49(3): 438-63.
46.
König, Thomas, Brooke Luetgert and Tanja Dannwolf ( 2006) ‘Quantifying European Legislative Research: Using Celex and Prelex in EU Legislative Studies’, European Union Politics7(4): 553-74.
47.
Lieberman, Evan S. ( 2005) ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’, American Political Science Review99(3): 435-52.
48.
Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese ( 2003) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
49.
Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz ( 2006) ‘A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research’, Political Analysis14(3): 227-49.
50.
Mastenbroek, Ellen ( 2003) ‘Surviving the Deadline: The Transposition of EU Directives in the Netherlands’, European Union Politics4(4): 371-95.
51.
Mastenbroek, Ellen and Michael Kaeding ( 2006) ‘Europeanization Beyond the Goodness of Fit: Domestic Politics in the Forefront’, Comparative European Politics4(4): 331-54.
52.
Mbaye, Heather A. D. ( 2001) ‘Why National States Comply with Supranational Law. Explaining Implementation Infringements in the European Union, 1972-1993’ , European Union Politics2(3): 259-81.
53.
Pappas, Spyros A. ( 1995) National Administrative Procedures for the Preparation and Implementation of Community Decisions. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administrations.
54.
Prechal, Sacha ( 2005) Directives in EC Law. Second, Completely Revised Edition. Oxford EC Law Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
Ragin, Charles C. ( 1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
Ragin, Charles C. ( 2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Rohlfing, Ingo ( 2007) ‘What You See and What You Get: Pitfalls and Principles of Nested Analysis in Comparative Research’, Comparative Political Studies41(11): 1492-514.
Schulz, Heiner and Thomas König ( 2000) ‘Institutional Reform and Decision Making Efficiency in theEuropean Union’, American Journal of Political Science44(4): 653-66.
60.
Siedentopf, Heinrich and Jacques Ziller ( 1988) Making European Policies Work: The Implementation of Community Legislation in the Member States. Vol. 1: Comparative Syntheses. London: Sage Publications.
61.
Steunenberg, Bernard ( 2006) ‘Turning Swift Policy-Making into Deadlock and Delay: National Policy Coordination and the Transposition of EU Directives’ , European Union Politics7(3): 293-319.
62.
Tallberg, Jonas ( 2002) ‘Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union’, International Organization56(3): 609-43.
63.
Thomson, Robert ( 2007) ‘Time to Comply: National Responses to Six EU Labour Market Directives Revisited’, West European Politics30(5): 987-1008.
64.
Thomson, Robert, René Torenvlied and Javier Arregui ( 2007) ‘The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives’, British Journal of Political Science37(4): 685-709.
65.
Treib, Oliver ( 2003) ‘Die Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien im Zeichen der Parteipolitik: Eine Akteurszentrierte Antwort auf die Misfit-These’ , Politische Vierteljahresschrift44(4): 506-28.
66.
Versluis, Esther ( 2003) Enforcement Matters. Enforcement and Compliance of European Directives in Four Member States. Delft: Eburon.
67.
Versluis, Esther ( 2007) ‘Even Rules, Uneven Practices: Opening the "Black Box" of EU Law in Action’, West European Politics30(1): 50-67.
68.
Zhelyazkova, Asya and René Torenvlied ( 2009) ‘The Time-Dependent Effect of Conflict in the Council on Delays in the Transposition of EU Directives’, European Union Politics10(1): 35-62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
