Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce
(2004)
‘Decision-Making Models, Rigor and New Puzzles’
, European Union Politics5(1):
99-123
.
2.
König, Thomas
and
Thomas Bräuninger
(2004)
‘Accession and Reform of the European Union: A Game-Theoretical
Analysis of Eastern Enlargement and the Constitutional Reform’
, European Union Politics5(3):
93-124
.
3.
König, Thomas
and
Simon Hug
(eds) (2005) Preference Formation and European
Constitution-building: A Comparative Study in Member States and Accession
Countries.ECPR/Routledge Series (forthcoming).
4.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power
from Rome to Maastricht.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
5.
Morton, Rebecca
(1999) Methods and Models: A Guide to the Empirical Analysis
of Formal Models in Political Science.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
6.
Thomson, Robert
,
Frans Stokman
,
Christopher Achen
and
Thomas Koenig
(eds) (2005) The European Union Decides.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
(forthcoming).
7.
Tsebelis, George
(2005) ‘The European Convention and the Rome and
Brussels IGCs: A Veto Player Analysis’, in
Thomas König
and
Simon Hug
(eds) Preference Formation and European Constitution-building: A
Comparative Study in Member States and Accession Countries.
ECPR/Routledge Series (forthcoming).
