This article tries to evaluate the impact of domestic and international factors on both deficits and deficit reduction in the European Union. Based on data covering 14 countries and 20 fiscal years (1978-97) we test the major hypotheses in the political economy literature. Beyond the investigation of the causes of cross-sectional variations in budget outcomes, we are also interested in changing patterns of influences over time, resulting from so-called `structural breaks'. On the one hand, our pooled time-series analyses show that very few political and institutional factors influenced the budget outcomes of the EU member states during this period. On the other hand, our estimation results provide suggestive support for our assumption that `Maastricht' amounted to a decisive structural break.
Achen, Christopher H.
(2000) `Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association (20-22 Jul.), UCLA.
2.
Alesina, Alberto
(1989) `Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies', Economic Policy8: 55-98.
3.
Alesina, Alberto
, Roberto Perotti and José Tavares (1998) `The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1: 197-266.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel
and Jonathan N. Katz (1995) `What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time Series Cross Section Data', American Political Science Review89: 634-647.
5.
Beck, Nathaniel
and Jonathan N. Katz (1996) `Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series Cross-Section Models', Political Analysis6: 1-36.
6.
Borelli, Stephen A.
and Terry J. Royed (1995) `Government Strength and Budget Deficits in Advanced Democracies', European Journal of Political Research28: 225-260.
7.
Clark, William Roberts
and Mark Hallerberg (2000) `Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy', American Political Science Review94: 323-346.
8.
Crepaz, Markus M. L.
(1996) `Consensus versus Majoritarian Democracy. Political Institutions and their Impact on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes', Comparative Political Studies29: 4-26.
9.
Cukierman, Alex
(1994) Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
De Haan, Jakob
and Jan-Egbert Sturm (1994) `Political and Institutional Determinants of Fiscal Policy in the European Community', Public Choice80: 157-172.
11.
Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W.
and Jakob De Haan (1996) The Political Economy of Central Bank Independence. Princeton, NJ: Department of Economics.
12.
Freitag, Markus
(1999) Politik und Währung. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Bern: Paul Haupt.
13.
Freitag, Markus
(2000) `Die politischen Rahmenbedingungen des Euro: Glaubwürdige Weichenstellungen oder Gefahr möglicher Entgleisungen?', Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft10: 967-997.
14.
Grilli, Vittorio
, Donato Masciandaro and Guido Tabellini (1991) `Political and Monetary Institutions and the Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries', Economic Policy13: 342-392.
15.
Hahm Deuk, Sung
, Mark S. Kamlet and Mowery David (1996) `The Political Economy of Deficit Spending in Nine Industrialized Parliamentary Democracies. The Role of Fiscal Institutions', Comparative Political Studies29: 52-77.
16.
Hallerberg, Mark
and Jürgen Von Hagen (1999) `Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits within the European Union', in James Poterba and Jürgen Von Hagen (eds) Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, pp. 209-232. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Heinemann, Friedrich
(2000) `Globalization, EMU and Fiscal Discipline. Evidence from OECD Countries', Aussenwirtschaft55: 211-232.
18.
Hibbs, Douglas A.
(1977) `Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy', American Political Science Review71: 1467-1487.
19.
International Labour Organization
(various years) Yearbook of Labour Statistics. Geneva: ILO.
20.
Kittel, Bernhard
(1999) `Sense and Sensitiveness in Pooled Analysis of Political Data', European Journal of Political Research35: 225-253.
21.
Lijphart, Arend
(1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Obstfeld, Maurice
(1997) `Europe's Gamble', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2: 241-300.
23.
OECD
(various years) Labour Force Statistics 1976-96. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
24.
OECD
(various years) Economic Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
25.
Olson, Mancur
(1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Quinn, Dennis P.
and Carla Inclan (1997) `The Origins of Financial Openness: A Study of Current and Capital Account Liberalization', American Journal of Political Science41: 771-813.
27.
Richter, Rudolf
(1994) Institutionen ökonomisch analysiert. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
28.
Rotte, Ralph
(1998) `International Commitment and Domestic Politics: A Note on the Maastricht Case', European Journal of International Relations4: 131-142.
29.
Rotte, Ralph
and Klaus Zimmermann (1998) `Fiscal Restraint and the Political Economy of EMU', Public Choice94: 385-406.
30.
Roubini, Nuriel
and Jeffrey Sachs (1989a) `Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Countries', Economic Policy8: 99-132.
31.
Roubini, Nuriel
and Jeffrey Sachs (1989b) `Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies', European Economic Review33: 903-938.
32.
Sayrs, Lois W.
(1989) Pooled Time Series Analysis. London: Sage.
33.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1987) Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus.
34.
Schmidt, Manfred G.
(1988) `Einführung', in Manfred G. Schmidt (ed.) Staatstätigkeit. International und historisch vergleichende Analysen, pp. 1-35. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
35.
Schmidt, Manfred G.
(1992) `Regierungen: Parteipolitische Zusammensetzung', in Manfred G. Schmidt (ed.) Lexikon der Politik, Band 3: Die westlichen Länder, pp. 393-400. Munich: Beck.
36.
Schmidt, Manfred G.
(1996) `When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and the Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy', European Journal of Political Research30: 155-183.
37.
Sciarini, Pascal
(1997) `Implementing EMU: A Quantitative Analysis of the Impact of Domestic Structure on Economic Performance', European University Institute, Florence, mimeo.
38.
Shonfield, Andrew
(1965) Modern Capitalism. The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: Oxford University Press.
39.
Simmons, Beth A.
(1999) `The Internationalization of Capital', in John Stephens, Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange and Gary Marks (eds) Change and Continuity in Contemporary Capitalism, pp. 36-69. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Wagschal, Uwe
(1996) Staatsverschuldung. Ursachen im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
41.
Wagschal, Uwe
(1998) `Politische und institutionelle Determinanten der Staatsverschuldung', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik47: 220-243.
42.
Woldendorp, Jan
, Hans Keman and Ian Budge (1998) `Party Government in 20 Democracies: An Update (1990-1995)', European Journal of Political Research29: 125-164.
43.
Wyplosz, Charles
(1997) `EMU: Why and How It Might Happen', Journal of Economic Perspectives11: 3-21.
