In this article, I present the results of an analysis of the geopolitical diversity of 61,781 papers that have been published in 17 leading international journals in development studies, and the results of another analysis in which I analysed the career trajectories of 260 faculty members working at 10 highly valued development studies departments. Regarding geopolitical diversity, I found a systemic inequality in terms of both research output and education trajectories. I argue that these imbalances contradict the expressed goals and values of development studies as a discipline that aims to reduce geopolitical inequalities. Policy implications are also discussed, in which I propose to reconsider academic recruitment standards and to raise the visibility of different epistemologies of published research in development studies.
AltbachP.G., YudkevichM. and RumbleyL.E.2015: Academic inbreeding: Local challenge, global problem. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 317–330.
2.
AstanehB. and MasoumiS.2018: From paper to practice: Indexing systems and ethical standards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 647–654. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9899-x.
3.
BaldiS.1994: Changes in the stratification structure of sociology: 1964–1992. American Sociologist, 25, 28–43.
4.
BauderH.2015: The international migration of academics: a labour market perspective. International Migration, 53, 83–96.
5.
BrandnerA. and CummingsS.J.R. (Eds.), 2018: Agenda knowledge for development: Strengthening agenda 2030 and the sustainable development goals. Knowledge for Development Partnership/Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.
6.
BurrisV.2004: The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in Ph.D. exchange networks. American Sociological Review69(2), 239–264.
7.
BonitzM., BrucknerE. and ScharnhorstA. (1997). Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics, 40, 407–422.
8.
BourdieuP.1988: Homo academicus. Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP.2004: Science of science and reflexivity. Polity Press.
10.
BurgessT.F. and ShawN.E.2010: Editorial board membership of management and business journals: A social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of Management, 21, 627–648.
11.
BühlmannF., BenzP., MachA. and RossierT.2017: Mapping the power of law professors: The role of scientific and social capital. Minerva, 55, 509–531.
12.
CanaveroF., FranceschiniF., MaisanoD. and MastrogiacomoG.2014: Impact of journals and academic reputations of authors: A structured bibliometric survey of the IEEE publication galaxy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(1), 17–40. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2013.2255935.
13.
ChandraR.1992: Industrialisation and development in the Third World. Routledge.
14.
Chase-DunnC.1999: Globalization: A world-systems perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5(2), 198–215.
15.
ClausetA., ArbesmanS. and LarremoreD.B.2015: Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1), 1–6.
16.
ClineE.H.2000: Contested peripheries in world systems theory: Megiddo and the jezreel valley as a test case. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6(1), 7–16.
17.
CookeB.2003: A new continuity with colonial administration: Participation in development management. Third World Quarterly24(1), 47–61.
18.
CowanR. and RosselloG.2018: Emergent structures in faculty hiring networks, and the effects of mobility on academic performance. Scientometrics, 117, 527–562.
19.
CretB. & MusselinC.2010: Academic hiring and inequality. In GoastellecG., editor, Understanding inequalities in, through and by higher education. Sense Publishers, 75–90.
20.
CummingsS.J.R.2020: Coloniality and wilful hermeneutic injustice. Script for the knowledge cafe on ‘Uncomfortable truths in global development.’ Available at: http://www.km4dev.org/profiles/blogs/blog-coloniality-and-wilful-hermaneutic-injustice (accessed 17Nov2021).
21.
CummingsS.J.R. and HoebinkP.2017: Representation of academics from developing countries as authors and editorial board members in scientific journals: Does this matter to the field of development studies?The European Journal of Development Research, 29(2), 369–383.
22.
CummingsS. J. R., RegeerB., de HaanL., ZweekhorstM. and BundersJ.2018: Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and the knowledge society within the sustainable development goals. Development Policy Review, 36(6), 727–742.
23.
DemeterM.2018a: Changing center and stagnant periphery in communication and media studies: National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication from 2013 to 2017. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2893–2921.
24.
DemeterM.2018b: Theorizing international inequalities in communication and media studies. A field theory approach. KOME − An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 6(2), 92–110.
25.
DemeterM.2019a: So far, yet so close. International career paths of communication scholars from the global south. International Journal of Communication, 13, 578–602.
26.
DemerterM.2019b: The world-systemic dynamics of soft power relations. The distribution of transnational academic capital in social sciences. Journal of World-System Research, 25(1), 111–144.
27.
DemeterM.2020a: Academic knowledge production and the global south: Questioning inequality and under-representation. Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
DemeterM.2020b: Virtual theme collection: Representation of Eastern Europe in media studies. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3), 586–589.
29.
DemeterM.2021: Taking off camouflage identities: Why peripheral scholars strive to look like their western peers in order to being recognized?Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 16(1), 53–68.
30.
DemeterM. and TóthT.2020: The world‑systemic network of global elite sociology: The western male monoculture at faculties of the top one‑hundred sociology departments of the world. Scientometrics, 124, 2469–2495.
31.
DemeterM. and IstratiiR.2020: Scrutinising what open access journals mean for global inequalities. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36, 505–522.
32.
DhananiA. and JonesM.J.2017: Editorial boards of accounting journals: Gender diversity and internationalisation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1785.
33.
EndersJ.2001: A chair system in transition: Appointments, promotions, and gate-keeping in German higher education. Higher Education, 41(1/2), 3–25.
34.
EnnewC. and GreenawayD.2012. The globalization of higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
FernandezA., FerrandizE. and LeonM.D.2016: Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better. Scientometrics, 106, 1073–1092. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1819-8
36.
GaltungJ.1971: A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117.
37.
GerhardsJ., HansS. and CarlsonS.2017: Social class and transnational human capital. How middle and upper class parents prepare their children for globalization. Routledge.
38.
GewinW.2018: Why diversity helps to produce stronger research. Nature, 13November2018.
39.
GiniC.1912: Variabiliti e Mutabiliti. Studi Economicoaguridici della facotta di Giurisprudenza dell. Universite di Cagliari III, Parte II.
40.
GoyanesM.2020: Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization?International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364.
41.
GoyanesM. and DemeterM.2020: How the geographic diversity of editorial boards affects what is published in JCR-ranked communication journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148.
42.
GoyanesM., DemeterM., Grané, A., Albarrán-LozanoI. and de ZúñigaH.G.2020: A mathematical approach to assess research diversity: Operationalization and applicability in communication sciences, political science, and beyond. Scientometrics, 125, 2299–2322.
43.
GouanvicJ.M.2005: A bourdieusian theory of translation, or the coincidence of practical instances. The Translator, 11(2), 147–166.
44.
HerschbergC., BenschopY. and van den BrinkM.2018: Selecting early-career researchers: The influence of discourses of internationalisation and excellence on formal and applied selection criteria in academia. Higher Education, 76, 807–825.
45.
HornidgeA.K.2011: ‘Knowledge society’ as academic concept and stage of development: A conceptual and historical review. In MenkhoffT., EversH.-D., WahC.Y. and PangE.F., editors, Beyond the knowledge trap: Developing Asia’s knowledge-based economies. World Scientific, 87–128.
46.
HuntV., LaytonD. and PrinceS.2015: Why diversity matters. MacKinsey Report. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters# (accessed 17Nov2021).
47.
KothariU.2019: A radical history of development studies: Individuals, institutions and ideologies. Zed Books.
48.
LaufE.2005: National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 139–151.
49.
LeydesdorffL., WagnerC.S. and BornmannL.2019: Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao–Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 255–269.
50.
LivingstoneS.2007: Internationalizing media and communication studies: Reflections on the International Communication Association. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 273–288.
51.
LongJ.S., AllisonP.D. and McGinnisR.1979: Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 816–830.
52.
MaliniakD., PetersonS., PowersR. and TierneyM.J.2018: Is international relations a global discipline? Hegemony, insularity, and diversity in the field. Security Studies, 27(3), 448–484.
53.
MallorquinC.2021: A southern perspective on development studies. Ariadna Ediciones.
54.
MetzI., HarzingA.W. and ZyphurM.J.2016: Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality?British Journal of Management, 27(4), 712–726. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12133.
55.
PowellK.2018: These labs are remarkably diverse—Here’s why they’re winning at science. Nature, 06June, 2018.
56.
RaoC.R.1982: Diversity: Its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44(1), 1–22.
57.
RockH. and GrantD.2018: Why diverse teams are smarter. Harvard Business Review, 04November, 2016.
58.
SchmochU. and SchubertT.2008: Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?Scientometrics, 74, 361–377.
59.
SchottT.1998: Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world-system: Accumulation of rewards, dominance and self-reliance in the center. Journal of World Systems Research, 4, 112–144.
60.
SmithG.D., TurnerC.S., Osei-KofiN. and RichardsS.2004: Interrupting the usual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 133–160.
61.
StephanP.E. and LevinS.G.1991: Inequality in scientific performance: Adjustment for attribution and journal impact. Social Studies of Science, 21(2), 351–368. doi: 10.1177/030631291021002007.
62.
StirlingA.2007: A general framework for analyzing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 4(15), 707–719.
63.
TeodorescuD. and TudorelA.2011: The growth of international collaboration in East European scholarly communities: A bibliometric analysis of journal articles published between 1989 and 2009. Scientometrics, 89, 711–722.
64.
TomlinsonG. and FreemanS.2018: Who really selected you? Insights into faculty selection processes in top-ranked higher education graduate programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 855–867.
65.
WacquantL.2018: Bourdieu comes to town: Pertinence, principles, applications. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), 90–105.
66.
WaisbordS. and MelladoC.2014: De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. doi: 10.1111/comt.12044.
67.
WallersteinI.1991: Geopolitics and geoculture. Cambridge University Press.
68.
WassermanH.2018: Power, meaning and geopolitics: Ethics as an entry point for global communication studies. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 441–451. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqy001.
69.
WillemsW.2014: Provincializing hegemonic histories of media and communication studies: Toward a genealogy of epistemic resistance in Africa. Communication Theory, 24(4), 415–434. doi: 10.1111/comt.12043.
70.
WilliamsonI. O. and CableD.M.2003: Predicting early career research productivity: The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 25–44.
71.
ZanottoS. R., HaeffnerC. and GuimaraesJ.A.2016: Unbalanced international collaboration affects adversely the usefulness of countries’ scientific output as well as their technological and social impact. Scientometrics, 109, 1789–1814.
72.
ZdenekR.2018: Editorial board self-publishing rates in Czech economic journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 669–682. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9922-2.
