Based on a case study of Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW), this article analyses organizational processes of norm translation, asking how IRW understands and employs global norms of gender equality. Approaching IRW as an organization positioned in between two different normative environments, the analysis explores the ways in which it seeks to align different sets of norms, balance between different kinds of expectations and create resonance with different audiences. In these processes, actors make use of a range of different strategies, including bridging, thinning and parallel co-existence, testifying to the complexities involved in translating organizational norms.
AcharyaA.2004: How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.
2.
BanksNicolaDavidHulme and MichaelEdwards. 2015: NGOs, States and Donors Revisited. Still Too Close for Comfort, World Development66, 707–718.
3.
BarnettM.2005: Humanitarianism transformed. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 723–740.
4.
BarnettM. and FinnemoreM.2004: Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
BenedettiCarlo. 2006: Islamic and Christian Inspired Relief NGOs: Between Tactical Collaboration and Strategic Diffidence. Journal of International Development, 18, 849–859.
6.
BenfordR.D. and SnowD.A.2000: Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
7.
BenthallJ.2008a: Returning to religion: Why a secular age is haunted by Faith. London: I.B. Tauris.
8.
BenthallJ.2008b: Have Islamic aid agencies a privileged relationship in majority Muslim areas? The case of post-tsunami reconstruction in Aceh. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (Online).
9.
BenthallJ. and Bellion-JourdanJ.2003: The charitable crescent. Politics of aid in the Muslim world. London: I.B. Tauris.
10.
BettizaG. and DionigiF.2015: How do religious norms diffuse? Institutional translation and international change in a post-secular world society. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 621–646.
11.
BoliJ. and ThomasG.M.1997: World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 171–190.
12.
CampbellJ.L.2004: Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
CampbellJ.L.2005: Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In DavisG.F.McAdamD.ScottW.R. and ZaldM.N., editors, Social movements and organization theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–68.
14.
ClarkJ.2004: Islam, charity and activism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
ClarkeG.2007: Agents of transformation? Donors, faith-based organizations and international development. Third World Quarterly, 28(1), 77–96.
16.
ClarkeG.2010: Trans-faith humanitarian partnerships: The case of Muslim aid and the United Methodist Committee on relief. European Journal of Development Research, 22(4), 510–528.
17.
ClarkeM. and TittensorD. (eds.) 2014: Islam and development: Exploring the invisible aid economy. London: Routledge.
18.
Cold-RavnkildeSigneLarsEngberg-Pedersen and AdamMoe Fejerskov. 2018: Global norms and heteroteneous development organizations. Introduction to special issue on New Actors, Old Donors and Gender Equality Norms in International Development Cooperation. Progress in Development Studies, 18(3), 1–19
19.
DiMaggioP.J.1988: Interest and agency in Institutional theory. In ZuckerL.G., editor, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 3–21.
20.
DiMaggioP.J. and PowellW.W.1983: The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1983), 147–160.
21.
DiMaggioP.J. and PowellW.W. (eds.) 1991: The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
DoniniA. and MinearL.2006: The humanitarian agenda 2015: principles, power and perceptions. Medford: Feinstein International Center.
23.
EscobarA.1995: Encountering development, the making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
FinnemoreM.1996: Norms, culture, and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization, 50(2), 325–347.
25.
FinnemoreM. and SikkinkK.1998: International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
26.
FountainP.2013: The myth of religious NGOs: Development studies and the return of religion. International Development Policy: Religion and Development, 4, 9–30.
27.
HowellJ. and LindJ.2009: Counter-terrorism, aid and civil society: before and after the War on Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
JawadR.2009: Social welfare and religion in the Middle East: A Lebanese perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
29.
JonesB. and Juul PetersenM.2011: Instrumentalist, narrow, normative? Reviewing recent work on religion and development. Third World Quarterly, 32(7), 1291–1306.
30.
JungD.Juul PetersenM. and SparreS.L.2014: Politics of modern Muslim subjectivities: Islam, youth and social activism in the Middle East. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
Juul PetersenM.2012a: Islamizing aid. Transnational Muslim NGOs after 9.11. Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 126–155.
32.
Juul PetersenM.2012b: Trajectories of transnational Muslim NGOs. Development in Practice, 22(5–6), 763–778.
33.
Juul PetersenM.2016a: For humanity or for the Umma? Aid and Islam in transnational Muslim NGOs. London: Hurst and Co.
34.
Juul PetersenM.2016b: International Muslim NGOs: ‘Added value’ or an echo of Western principles and donor wishes? In SezginZeynep and DijkzeulDennis, editors, The new humanitarians in International practice. London: Routledge.
35.
KhanA.A.2012: Religious obligations or altruistic giving? Muslims and charitable donations. In BarnettM. and SteinJ., editors, Sacred aid: Faith and humanitarianism. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
KirmaniN. and KhanA.A.2008: Does faith matter? An examination of Islamic relief’s work with refugees and internally displaced persons. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27(2), 41–50.
37.
KrookM.L. and TrueJ.2012: Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103–127.
38.
LaceyR. and BenthallJ.2014: Gulf charities and Islamic philanthropy in the ‘age of terror’ and beyond. Berlin: Gerlach Press.
39.
LendvaiN. and StubbsP.2009: Assemblages, translation, and intermediaries in South East Europe: rethinking transnationalism and social policy. European Societies, 11(5), 673–695.
40.
LevittP. and MerryS.2009: Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461.
41.
LewisD. and MosseD.2006: Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
42.
MarshallK.2005: Religious faith and development: Rethinking development debates. Presentation at Workshop on Religious NGOs and International Development, Oslo, Norway, 7 April.
43.
MerryS.E.2006: Human rights and gender violence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
MeyerJ.W. and RowanB.1977: Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
45.
MeyerJ.W. and ScottW.R.1992: Preface to the Updated Edition. In MeyerJ.W. and ScottW.R., editors, Organizational environments. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
46.
MosseD.2005: Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto Press.
47.
PalmerV.2011: Analysing cultural proximity: Islamic Relief Worldwide and Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. Development in Practice, 21(1), 96–108.
48.
PearsonR. and TomalinE.2007: Intelligent design: A gender sensitive interrogation of religion and development. In JenningsClarke, and Shaw, editors, Development, civil society and faith-based organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 46–71.
49.
RisseT.. (eds) 1999: The power of human rights: International norms & domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
RistG.2008: The history of development: From Western origins to global faith (3rd edition). London: Zed Books.
51.
SalihM.M.A.2002: Islamic NGOs in Africa: The promise and peril of Islamic voluntarism (Occasional Paper). Copenhagen: Centre of African Studies, University of Copenhagen.
52.
SarfatyG.2012: Values in translation: Human rights and the culture of the World Bank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53.
SchaublinE.2009: Role and governance of Islamic charitable institutions: The West Bank Zakat Comittees (1977–2009) in the Local Context. Geneva: Center on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding Working Papers.
54.
SingerA.2008: Charity in Islamic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
StirratR.L. and HeikoHenkel. 1997: The Development Gift: The Problem of Reciprocity in the NGO World. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 66–80.
56.
StoneD.2012: Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33, 483–499.
57.
SunsteinCass R.1996: Social Norms and Social Roles, Columbia Law Review, 96, 903–968.
58.
Tadros2010: Faith in service: What has gender got to do with it?OpenDemocracy, 16November. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/mariz-tadros/faith-in-service-what-has-gender-got-to-do-with-it, last accessed on 14April2018.
59.
TomalinE.2015: Gender, development and the ‘de-privatization’ of religion. In BushR.FountainP. and FeenerM., editors, Religion and the politics of development: Priests, potentates, and ‘progress’. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 61–82.
60.
VerlooM. and LombardoE.2007: Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: Introducing a critical frame analysis approach. In VerlooM., editor, Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, 21–49.
61.
ZwingelS.2006: From intergovernmental negotiations to (sub)national change: A transnational perspective on the impact of CEDAW. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(3), 400–424.
62.
ZwingelS.2012: How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 115–129.
