This paper examines how various poverty assessment modalities serve to strengthen the governance capacities necessary to target the poor. Large-scale surveys and qualitative, ‘bottom-up’ assessments both have shortcomings in this regard. A ‘multi-level’ synthesis would in theory link a unified indicator framework (such as the Millennium Development Goals) to localized situation assessments and facilitate multi-sectoral efforts to target the poor. Case studies of actual efforts to do this from Vietnam and Burma highlight the way in which the governance context of a country must be taken into account when designing such efforts.
Brassard, C.2005: Poverty and Inequality in Vietnam: Legacies from the Past. PhD Dissertation,
Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
.
2.
Brinkerhoff, D.W.1991: Improving Development Program Performance: Guidelines for Managers.
Lynne Rienner
.
3.
Brinkerhoff, D.W.2000:
Assessing Political Will for Anti-Corruption Efforts: An Analytical Framework
. Public Administration and Development20,
239–52
.
4.
Brinkerhoff, D.W.
and
Crosby, B.2002: Managing Policy Reform: Concepts and Tools for Decision-Makers in Developing and Transitioning Countries.
Kumarian Press
.
5.
Chambers, R.1997: Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last.
Intermediate Technology Publications
.
6.
Cleaver, F.2001: Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In
Cooke, B.
and
Kothari, U.
, editors, Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books, 36–55.
Francis, P.
and
James, R.2003:
Balancing Rural Poverty Reduction and Citizen Participation: The Contradictions of Uganda's Decentralization Program
. World Development31,
325–37
.
9.
Fritzen, S.2000: ‘Decentralization and Local Government Performance: A Comparative Framework with Application to Social Policy Reform in Vietnam’. PhD Dissertation,
Princeton University
.
10.
Fritzen, S.2002: ‘
The “Foundation of Public Administration”? Decentralization and its Discontents in Transitional Vietnam
’. Paper presented to the Asia Conference on Governance in Asia, 5–7 December 2002, Hong Kong: City University.
11.
Fritzen, S.2003: Governance and Child Rights: A Diagnostic Framework for Donor Programming.
UNICEF
.
12.
Fritzen, S.
and
Brassard, C.2005: Vietnam Inequality Report 2005: Causes and Policy Implications.
U.K. Department for International Development
.
13.
Hayward, C.
,
Simpson, L.
and
Wood, L.2004:
Still Left Out in the Cold: Problematising Participatory Research and Development
. Sociologia Ruralis44, pp.
95–108
. http://www.unarg/millenniumgoals/lent (accessed on 15 January 2006).
14.
Kanbur, R.
, editor, 2005: ‘Q-Squared – Qualitative and Quantitative Poverty Appraisal: Complementaries, Tensions and the Way Forward’. Q-Squared Working Paper No. 1, October 2005, http://www.q-squared.ca/ (last accessed 20 February 2006).
15.
Kaufmann, D.
,
Kraay, A.
and
Mastruzzi, M.2005: Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996–2004.
Washington, D.C.: World Bank policy research working paper 3237. World Bank
.
16.
Korten, D.1990: Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda.
Kumarian Press
.
17.
Leisinger, K.2004:
Overcoming Poverty and Respecting Human Rights: Ten Points for Serious Consideration
. International Social Science Journal56(2),
313–20
.
18.
Manor, J.1999: The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization.
World Bank
.
19.
Mearns, R.2004:
Sustaining Livelihoods on Mongolia's Pastoral Commons: Insights from a Participatory Poverty Assessment
. Development and Change35,
107–39
.
20.
Miller-Adams, M.1999: The World Bank: New Agendas in a Changing World.
Routledge
.
21.
Muffels, R.J.A.2000: Dynamics of Poverty and Determinants of Poverty Transitions. In
Rose, D.
, editor, Researching Social and Economic Change: The Uses of Household Panel Studies.
Routledge
, 165–87.
22.
Parfit, T.2004:
The Ambiguity of Participation: A Qualified Defence of Participatory Development
. Third World Quarterly25,
537–56
.
23.
Riedel, J.
and
Turley, W.1999: The Politics and Economics of Transition to an Open Market Economy in Vietnam. OECD Technical Paper, no. 152.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
.
24.
Robb, C.M.
2002 : Can the Poor Influence Policy? Participatory Poverty Assessment in the Developing World, 2nd Edition,
International Monetary Fund and World Bank
.
25.
Sen, A.1995: ‘The Political Economy of Targeting’. In
Nead, K.
and
van de Walle, D.
, editors, Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence.
Washington, D.C.: World Bank
, 11–24.
26.
Sen, A.1999: Development as Freedom.
Oxford University Press
.
27.
Steinberg, D.2002: Burma: The State of Myanmar.
Georgetown University Press
.
28.
Thomas, A.
,
Chataway, J.
, and
Wuyts, M.
, editors, 1998: Finding Out Fast: Investigative Skills for Policy and Development,
Sage Publications
.
29.
United Nations. What are the Millennium Development Goals?http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (last accessed 15 January 2006).
30.
United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF). 1999: Taking Risks: Background Papers.
UNCDF
.
31.
World Bank 2005: East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Government Work.
World Bank
.
