New ways are needed of framing the international politics of development in the
context of global restructuring. The old thinking that employed such terms as
‘Third World’, ‘developing countries’,
‘core and periphery’, even ‘North’ and
‘South’ needs to be abandoned. It does not travel well into a
globalizing world. New interpretations of international inequality emerged in the
1990s - the so-called ‘Bretton Woods’ and ‘United
Nations’ paradigms - and are linked to attendant economic liberal and
sociological strands of political economy analysis. But both approaches underplay
politics. However, the new global politics of development can be satisfactorily
framed, provided that we adopt an approach that takes globalization seriously,
recognizes the continuing, albeit changing, realities of states and interstate
politics and reinterprets development as a universal problem. Attempts to classify
states and societies in advance of research must also be avoided.
Amoore, L.
,
Dodgson, R.
,
Gills, B. K.
,
Langley, L.
,
Marshall D.
and
Watson, I.1997:
Overturning ‘globalisation’: resisting the
teleological, reclaiming the ‘political’
. New Political Economy2 (1),
179-195
.
2.
Berger, M. T.1994:
The end of the ‘Third World’?
. Third World Quarterly15 (2),
257-275
.
3.
Booth, D.1985:
Marxism and development sociology: interpreting the impasse?
. World Development13 (7),
761-787
.
4.
Brandt Commission
. 1980: North-South: a programme for survival.
London: Pan Books
.
5.
Castells, M.1998: The information age: economy, society and culture; vol. 3: end
of millenniumOxford: Blackwell
.
6.
Cox, R. W.1981:
Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory
. Millennium: Journal of International Studies10 (2),
126-155
.
7.
Cox, R. W.1983:
Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method
. Millennium: Journal of International Studies12 (2),
162-175
.
8.
Cox, R. W.1989: Production, the state, and change in the world
order. In:
Czempiel, E-O.
and
Rosenau, J. N.
, editors, Global changes and theoretical challenges: approaches to world
politics for the 1990s.
Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books
, 337-350.
9.
Davis, M.1990: City of quartz: excavating the future in Los Angeles.
London: Verso
.
10.
Grugel, J.
and
Hout, W.1999: Regions, regionalism and the South. In:
Grugel, J.
and
Hout, W.
, editors, Regionalism across the North-South divide: state strategies
and globalization.
London and New York: Routledge
, 3-13.
11.
Held, D.
, and
McGrew, A.
,
Goldblatt, D.
and
Perraton, J.1999: Global transformations: politics, economics and culture.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
12.
Hettne, B.1995: Development theory and the three worlds: towards an
international political economy.
Harlow: Longman
.
13.
Hirst, P.
and
Thompson, G.1996: Globalization in question: the international economy and the
possibilities of governance,
Cambridge: Polity Press
14.
Holm, H-H.1990:
The end of the Third World?
. Journal of Peace Research27 (1),
1-7
.
15.
Hoogvelt, A.1997: Globalisation and the postcolonial world: the new political
economy of development.
London: Macmillan
.
16.
Jones, C. A.1983: The North-South dialogue: a brief history.
London: Macmillan
.
17.
Kamrava, M.1995:
Political culture and a new definition of the Third World
. Third World Quarterly16 (4),
691-701
.
18.
Korany, B.1994:
End of history, or its continuation and accentuation? The global South and
the ‘new transformation’ literature
. Third World Quarterly15 (1),
7-15
.
19.
Krasner, S. D.1985: Structural conflict: the third world against global
liberalism.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
20.
Lewellen, T. C.1995: Dependency and development: an introduction to the Third
World.
Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey
.
21.
Ma, S-Y.1998:
Third World studies, development studies and post-communist studies:
definitions, distance and dynamism
. Third World Quarterly19 (3),
339-356
.
22.
Magyar, K. P.1995:
Classifying the international political economy: a Third World proto-theory
. Third World Quarterly16 (4),
703-716
.
23.
Mann, M.1997:
Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state?
. Review of International Political Economy4 (3),
472-496
.
24.
Payne, A. J.1994:
US hegemony and the reconfiguration of the Caribbean
. Review of International Studies20 (2),
149-168
.
25.
Pieterse, J. N.1996:
The development of development theory: towards critical globalism
. Review of International Political Economy3 (4),
541-564
.
26.
Randall, V.1992:
Third World: rejected or redis-covered?
. Third World Quarterly13(4),
727-730
.
27.
Ravenhill, J.1990:
The North-South balance of power
. International Affairs66 (4),
731-748
.
28.
Sachs, W.
, editor, 1992: The development dictionary: a guide to
knowledge.
London: Zed Books
.
29.
Thérien, J-P.1999:
Beyond the North-South divide: two tales of world poverty
. Third World Quarterly20 (4),
723-742
.
30.
Toye, J.1987: Dilemmas of development: reflections on the counter-revolution
in development theory and policy.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
.
31.
United Nations1995: Report of the world summit for social development.
A/CONF, 166/9, 19 April.
New York: United Nations
.
32.
United Nations Development Programme1997: Human development report 1997.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
33.
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development1995: States of disarray: the social effects of globalization.
Geneva: UNRISD
.
34.
Wendt, A.1999: Social theory of international politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
35.
Willetts, P.1978: The non-aligned movement: the origins of a Third World
alliance.
London: Frances Pinter
.
36.
Williams, M.1993:
Re-articulating the Third World coalition: the role of the environmental agenda
. Third World Quarterly14 (1),
7-29
.
37.
Wolf-Phillips, L.1987:
Why ‘Third World’?: origin, definition and usage
. Third World Quarterly9 (4),
1311-1327
.
38.
World Bank
. 1995a: The World Bank annual report 1995.
Washington, DC: World Bank
.
39.
World Bank
. 1995b: Global economic prospects and the developing
countries 1995.
Washington DC: World Bank
.
