This study utilizes interviews with 37 full-time, professional sports journalists to understand how they construct their identity. With social identity theory as a framework, the study found that access, organizational backing, and role conception represent characteristics essential to being a sports journalist (the in-group). While the journalists also identified what they considered business reporters, social media personalities, and non-objective analysts as characteristics that, in some cases, exclude persons from calling themselves sports journalists (the out-group). These results are then interpreted through the framework of social identity theory, boundary work and professional identity.
AlsaawiA (2014) A critical review of qualitative interviews. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences3(4): 149–156.
2.
BaldastyGJ (1992) The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3.
BensonR (2006) News media as a “journalistic field”: what Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication23(2): 187–202.
4.
BourdieuP (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BoyleR (2017) Sports journalism. Digital Journalism5(5): 493–495.
6.
BradshawTMinogueD (2019) Sports Journalism: The State of Play. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
7.
BresnahanMJLeeC (2011) Activating racial stereotypes on survivor cook Islands. Howard Journal of Communications22(1): 64–82.
8.
BrewerMB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: a cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86(2): 307–324.
9.
BrewerMB (1999) The psychology of prejudice: in-group love or out-group hate?Journal of Social Issues55(3): 429–444.
10.
BrewerMBSilverMD (2000) Group distinctiveness, social identification, and collective mobilization. Self, Identity, and Social Movements13: 153–171.
11.
CarlsonM (2015) Introduction: the many boundaries of journalism. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices, and Participation. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–18.
12.
CarterAWFerrucciP (2024) The professional backstaging of diversity in journalism. Journal of Communication74(3): 212–224.
13.
ChristiansCGGlasserTLMcQuailD, et al. (2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14.
DenzinNK (2001) The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research1(1): 23–46.
15.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
16.
DeuzeM (2008) The professional identity of journalists in the context of convergence culture. Observatorio2(4): 103–117.
17.
EmersonRFretzRShawL (2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
FalcousMHawzenMGNewmanJI (2019) Hyperpartisan sports media in Trump’s America: the metapolitics of Breitbart sports. Communication & Sport7(5): 588–610.
19.
FerrucciP (2022a) Covering sports, when there’s no sports: COVID, market orientation, paywalls and the Athletic. Newspaper Research Journal43(4): 389–406.
20.
FerrucciP (2022b) Joining the team: metajournalistic discourse, paradigm repair, the athletic and sports journalism practice. Journalism Practice16(10): 2064–2082.
21.
FerrucciP (2024) The Organization of Journalism: Market Models and Practice in a Fraying Profession. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
22.
FerrucciPKuhnT (2022) Remodeling the hierarchy: an organization-centric model of influence for media sociology research. Journalism Studies23(4): 525–543.
23.
FerrucciPVosT (2017) Who’s in, who’s out? Constructing the identity of digital journalists. Digital Journalism5(7): 868–883.
24.
FerrucciPTandocECJrSchausterEE (2020a) Journalists primed: how professional identity affects moral decision making. Journalism Practice14(8): 896–912.
25.
FerrucciPTaylorRAlaimoKI (2020b) On the boundaries: professional photojournalists navigating identity in an age of technological democratization. Digital Journalism8(3): 367–385.
26.
GardikiotisA (2008) Group distinctiveness, political identification, and the third-person effect: perceptions of a political campaign in the 2004 Greek national election. Media Psychology11(3): 331–353.
27.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
28.
HavardCTGrieveFGPeetzTB (2021) Introduction of a hierarchy of out-group derogation. In: Rivalry and Group Behavior Among Consumers and Brands. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 105–128.
29.
HoggMATerryDJWhiteKM (1995) A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly58(4): 255–269.
30.
HullKLewisNP (2014) Why twitter displaces broadcast sports media: a model. International Journal of Sport Communication7(1): 16–33.
31.
HutchinsBBoyleR (2017) A community of practice. Digital Journalism5(5): 496–512.
32.
HutchinsBRoweD (2010) Reconfiguring media sport for the online world: an inquiry into “sports news and digital media”. International Journal of Communication4: 23.
33.
JaakkolaMHellmanHKoljonenK, et al. (2015) Liquid modern journalism with a difference: the changing professional ethos of cultural journalism. Journalism Practice9(6): 811–828.
34.
JohnstoneJWCSlawskiEJBowmanWW (1976) The News People: A Sociological Portrait of American Journalists and Their Work. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
35.
KnightAGeuzeCGerlisA (2008) Who is a journalist. Journalism Studies9(1): 117–131.
36.
KopytowskaMWKalyangoY (2014) Introduction: discourse, identity and the public sphere. In: KopytowskaMW (ed) Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World. New York: Peter Lang, 1–16.
37.
LewisSCMolyneuxL (2018) A decade of research on social media and journalism: assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication6(4): 11–23.
38.
LewisGJKandlerCRiemannR (2014) Distinct heritable influences underpin in-group love and out-group derogation. Social Psychological and Personality Science5(4): 407–413.
39.
LucieSFabienO (2021) “How can they like doing that?” The ambivalent definition of legitimate work in sports journalism. Journalism Studies22(3): 263–281.
40.
McEnnisS (2017) Playing on the same pitch: attitudes of sports journalists towards fan bloggers. Digital Journalism5(5): 549–566.
41.
McEnnisS (2020) Toy department within the toy department? Online sports journalists and professional legitimacy. Journalism21(10): 1415–1431.
MirerM (2019) Playing the right way: in-house sports reporters and media ethics as boundary work. Journal of Media Ethics34(2): 73–86.
45.
ÖrnebringH (2009) Reassessing journalism as a profession. In: AllanS (ed) The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 568–577.
PerreaultGBellTR (2022) Towards a “digital” sports journalism: field theory, changing boundaries and evolving technologies. Communication & Sport10(3): 398–416.
48.
PerreaultGNöllekeD (2022) What is sports journalism? How COVID-19 accelerated a redefining of US Sports reporting. Journalism Studies23(14): 1860–1879.
49.
PetersJTandocEC (2013) “People who aren’t really reporters at all, who have no professional qualifications”: defining a journalist and deciding who may claim the privileges. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy34: 34–63.
50.
ReedS (2018) “I'm not a fan. I'm a journalist”: measuring American sports journalists' sports enthusiasm. Journal of Sports Media13(1): 27–47.
51.
RoweD (2007) Sports journalism: still the toy department' of the news media?Journalism8(4): 385–405.
52.
RyfeDM (2009) Broader and deeper: a study of newsroom culture in a time of change. Journalism10(2): 197–216.
53.
ShefferMLSchultzB (2010) Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication3(4): 472–484.
54.
SherwoodMO’DonnellP (2018) Once a journalist, always a journalist? Industry restructure, job loss and professional identity. Journalism Studies19(7): 1021–1038.
55.
SingerJB (2015) Out of bounds: professional norms as boundary makers. In: CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices, and Participation. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 21–36.
56.
SmithGJ (1976) A study of a sports journalist. International Review of Sport Sociology11(3): 5–26.
57.
SpradleyJP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. Holt: Rininehart and Wston.
58.
TajfelH (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
TajfelHTurnerJ (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33–47.
60.
TandocECJrHellmuellerLVosTP (2013) Mind the gap: between journalistic role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice7(5): 539–554.
61.
VosTPFerrucciP (2018) Who am I? Perceptions of digital journalists’ professional identity. In: Eldridge IISFranklinB (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Developments in Digital Journalism Studies. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 40–52.
62.
WeedonGWilsonBYoonL, et al. (2018) Where’s all the ‘good’ sports journalism? Sports media research, the sociology of sport, and the question of quality sports reporting. International Review for the Sociology of Sport53(6): 639–667.
63.
WeissRS (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York City: Free Press.
64.
WhiteRCheungM (2015) Communication of fantasy sports: a comparative study of user-generated content by professional and amateur writers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications58(2): 192–207.
