Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates, within the framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis, how The New York Times (NYT) has been metaphorically formulating China as an “other” from 1949 to 2020. Metaphors were identified with reference to Pragglejaz Group’s (2007) Metaphor Identification Procedure. WAR and GAME were detected as dominant concepts, and LIQUID, DISEASE, ANIMAL, MACHINE, and OBSTACLE secondary imagery. It is found that the newspaper’s journalistic values in foreign news reporting and judging criteria toward political leadership have remained radically unchanged. Having been influenced by changes in China-U.S. relations and America’s domestic socio-political ideals, the NYT has been othering China from the civilized world, which tends to be particularly prominent when China’s performance is short of the values and norms preached by the US, and became inconspicuous during China-U.S. alliance. Running counter to its commitment to “truth,” the newspaper employed discursive strategies to balance between America’s moral self-identity and its China policy, and vindicate behaviors identical to those it has been criticizing China for.

Keywords

China image Critical Metaphor Analysis The New York Times

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson

Dasgupta

Park

, et al. (1998) Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2: 243–250.

Alexander

Levin

Henry

(2005) Image theory, social identity and social dominance: structural characteristics and individual motives underlying international image. International Society of Political Psychology 26(1): 27–45.

Bennett

Edelman

(1985) Toward a new political narrative. Journal of Communication 35(4): 156–171.

Billig

Macmillan

(2005) Metaphor, idiom and ideology: the search for no smoking guns across time. Discourse and Society 16(4): 459–480.

Black

(1970) The second persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech 56(2): 109–119.

Broomfield

(2003) Perceptions of danger: the China threat theory. Journal of Contemporary China 12(35): 265–284.

Cater

(1959) The Fourth Branch of Government. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Caillois

(2001) Man, Play and Games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Cammaerts

(2012) The strategic use of metaphors by political and media elites: the 2007-2011 Belgian constitutional crisis. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 8(2): 229–249.

10.

Chang

(1988) The news and U.S.-China policy: symbols in newspapers and documents. Journalism Quarterly 65(2): 320–327.

11.

Charteris-Black

(2004) Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave.

12.

Charteris-Black

(2006) Britain as a container: immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society 17(5): 563–581.

13.

Cohen

(1994) A view from the academy. In: Bennett

Paletz

(eds), Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 8–11.

14.

Darnovsky

Kauffman

Robinson

(1991) What will this war mean? In: Sifry

Cerf

(eds), The Gulf War Reader. New York: Times Books/Random House, pp. 480–486.

15.

Davis

(1990) News and politics. In: Swanson

Nimmo

(eds), New Directions in Political Communication. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 147–232.

16.

Dawson

(1967) The Chinese Chameleon: An Analysis of European Conception of Chinese Civilization. London: Oxford University Press.

17.

Entman

(1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: contrast in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication 41(4): 6–27.

18.

Fowler

(1996) Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Gramsci

(1971) Selection from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

20.

Gurnham

(2019) Hell has no flames, only windows that won’t open: justice as escape in law and literature. Law and Humanities 13(2): 1–25.

21.

Hackett

Zhao

(1994) Challenging a master narrative: peace protest and opinion/editorial discourse in the U.S. press during the Gulf War. Discourse and Society 5(4): 509–541.

22.

Halliday

MAK

(2002) Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. London: Continuum.

23.

Hanne

(2022) How we escape capture by the “war” metaphor for Covid-19. Metaphor and Symbol 37(2): 88–100.

24.

Haslam

(2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(3): 252–264.

25.

Shi

Liu

(2020) Crisis governance, Chinese style: distinctive features of China’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Policy Design and Practice 3(3): 242–258.

26.

(2022) Evading the lockdown: animal metaphors and dehumanization in virtual space. Metaphor and Symbol 37(1): 21–38.

27.

Horowitz

(2020) Italy locks down much of the countries’ north over the coronavirus. Available at: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1236484352965521408

28.

Huntington

(1997) The erosion of American national interest. Foreign Affairs 76(5): 28–49.

29.

Isaacs

(1980) Scratches on Our Minds: American Views of China and India. New York: Routledge.

30.

Jannuzi

(2003) China through distant eyes. In: McGiffert

(ed), China in the American Political Imagination. Washington: The CSIS Press, pp. 47–51.

31.

Jervis

(1970) The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

32.

Jian

(2019) From Mao to Deng: China’s Changing Relations with the United State. Washington, DC: Wilson Center. Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/mao-to-deng-chinas-changing-relations-the-united-states

33.

Kobland

Kwan

(1992) Influence of ideology in news reporting: case study of New York Times’ coverage of student demonstrations in China and South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication 2(2): 64–77.

34.

Kovecses

(2010) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

35.

Lakoff

(1993) The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: In Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Lakoff

Johnson

(1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

37.

Chitty

(2009) Reframing national image: a methodological framework. Conflict and Communication 8(20): 1–11.

38.

Liss

(2003) Images of China in the American print media: a survey from 2000 to 2002. Journal of Contemporary China 12(35): 299–318.

39.

Luther

(2002) National identities, structure, and press images of nations: the case of Japan and the United States. Mass Communication and Society 5(1): 57–85.

40.

Mackerras

(2013) China in My Eyes: Western Images of China since 1949. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

41.

Mayr

(1986) Authority, Liberty and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

42.

Meltzer

Shenai

(2019) The U.S.-China Economic Relationship: A Comprehensive Approach. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-us-china-economic-relationship-a-comprehensive-approach/

43.

Millward

(2004) Violent Separatism in Xinjiang: A Critical Assessment. Washington: East-West Center.

44.

Musolff

(2016) Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.

45.

Perlmutter

(2007) Picturing China in the American Press. Lanham: Lexington.

46.

Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1): 1–39.

47.

Ringmar

(2008) Metaphors of social order. In: Carver

Pikalo

(eds), Political Language and Metaphor. London: Routledge, pp. 57–68.

48.

Schön

(1979) Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In: Ortony

(ed), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–283.

49.

CYK

(1987) The summit as war: how journalists use metaphors. Journalism Quarterly 64: 623–626.

50.

Sontag

(1978) Illness as Metaphor. New York: McGraw-Hill.

51.

Tekin

(2008) The construction of Turkey’s possible EU membership in French political discourse. Discourse and Society 19(6): 727–763.

52.

Thurston

(2003) Chinese democracy in the American political imagination. In: McGiffert

(ed), China in the American Political Imagination. Washington: The CSIS Press, pp. 93–102.

53.

Turner

(2014) American Images of China: Identity, Power, Policy. New York: Routledge.

54.

van Dijk

(2002) Political discourse and political cognition. In: Chilton

Schaffner

(eds). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 203–237.

55.

Wang

(2006) Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review 32(2): 91–96.

56.

Womack

(1990) The dilemma of centricity and internationalism in China. In: Lee

(ed), Voices of China: The Interplay of Politics and Journalism. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 229–242.

57.

Yang

(2017) American Political Discourse on China. New York: Routledge.

58.

(1998) Projecting the China image: news making and news reporting in the United States. In: Li

Hong

(eds), Image, Perception, and the Making of U.S.-China Relations. Lanham: University Press of America, pp. 50–80.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

China’s metaphorically “othered” image in The New York Times (1949-2020)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material