This article addresses the smartphone as a complicated technology of forced migration: a device that accompanies those who move, but which also records and catalogues digital traces within life contexts of conflict, uprooting, migration and resettlement. We conceptualise smartphones as personal digital archives: migrants’ curation of their own stories on their own portable devices. Personal digital archives, we argue, reflect the migrant gaze and constitute mobile subaltern subjects’ record of forced migration. Inductively learning from fieldwork conducted across five sites over 5 years, we analyse how the personal digital archive records and reflects the mediation of migration in its three dimensions: symbolic, affective and material. By focussing on personal digital archives, we recentre the authority of migrants as witnessing subjects of their own life stories. Their archives as autonomous migrant records provide a powerful basis to reflect upon and potentially contest mainstream western journalism cultures, which too often reduce migration to a spectacle and the migrant to a dehistoricised figure with little agency or voice.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AppaduraiA (2019) Traumatic exit, identity narratives, and the ethics of hospitality. Television & New Media20(6): 558–565.
3.
AwadITossellJ (2019) Is the smartphone always a smart choice? Against the utilitarian view of the ‘connected migrant’, Information, Communication & Society24, 611–626. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668456
4.
BeerDBurrowsR (2013) Popular culture, digital archives and the new social life of data. Theory, Culture & Society30(4): 47–71.
5.
BolhuisMPVan WijkJ (2020) Seeking asylum in the digital era. Journal of Refugee Studies34(2):1595–1617.DOI: 10.1093/jrs/feaa029.
6.
BragerJ (2015) The selfie and the other: consuming viral tragedy and social media (after)lives. Internatinoal Journal of Communication9: 1660–1671.
7.
BrekkeJPStaverA (2019) Social media screening: Norway’s asylum system. FEMS Microbiology Reviews61: 9–11.
8.
BruinenbergHSprengerSOmerovićE, et al. (2019) Practicing critical media literacy education with/for young migrants: lessons learned from a participatory action research project. International Communication Gazette83, 26–47. DOI: 10.1177/1748048519883511.
9.
CarastathisAKouri-ToweNMahrouseG, et al. (2018) Introduction. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees34(1): 3–15.
10.
ChouliarakiL (2015) Digital witnessing in war journalism: the case of post-arab spring conflicts. Popular Communication13(2): 105–119.
11.
ChouliarakiL (2017) Symbolic bordering: the self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news. Popular Communication15(2): 78–94.
12.
ChouliarakiLGeorgiouM (2019) The digital border: mobility beyond territorial and symbolic divides. European Journal of Communication34(6): 594–605.
CiforMGillilandAJ (2016) Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science16: 1–6.
15.
CoverR (2017) Memorialising queer community: digital media, subjectivity and the Lost Gay # archives of social networking. Media International Australia170(1): 126–135.
16.
CvetkovichA (2003) An Archive of Feelings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
DiminescuD (2008) The connected migrant. Social Science Information47(4), 565–579.
18.
ErdalMBOeppenC (2018) Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(6): 981–998.
19.
ErnstW (2013) Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
Garde-HansenJHoskinsAReadingA (eds), (2009) Save as… Digital Memories. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
21.
GatrellP (2017) Refugees—what’s wrong with history?Journal of Refugee Studies30(2): 170–189.
22.
GeorgiouM (2019) Does the subaltern speak? Migrant voices in digital Europe. Popular Communication16(1): 45–57.
23.
GeorgiouMHallSDajaniD (2020) Suspension: disabling the city of refuge? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Epub ahead of print 7 July 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1788379.
24.
GillespieMOsseiranSCheesmanM (2018) Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–12.
25.
GreeneA (2019) Mobiles and ‘making do’: exploring the affective, digital practices of refugee women waiting in Greece. European Journal of Cultural Studies23(5): 731–748.
26.
HandM (2016) Persistent traces, potential memories. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies22(3): 269–286.
27.
HobbsC (2001) The character of personal archives: reflections on the value of records of individuals. Archivaria52: 126–135.
28.
IbrusIOjamaaB (2020) The creativity of digital (audiovisual) archives: a dialogue between media archaeology and cultural semiotics. Theory, Culture & Society37(3): 49–70.
29.
KayeJVertesiJAveryS, etal. (2006) To have and to hold: exploring the personal archive. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 2006. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 22275–27284.
30.
KimS (2013) Personal Digital Archives: Preservation of Documents, Preservation of SelfPhD dissertation. USA: The University of Texas at Austin. Available at: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/21134.
31.
LeursK (2017) Communication rights from the margins: politicising young refugees’ smartphone pocket archives. International Communication Gazette79(6–7): 674–698.
32.
LewisT (2018) Digital food: from paddock to platform. Communication Research and Practice4(3): 212–228.
33.
LølandI (2019) Negotiating paradise lost: refugee narratives of pre-war Syria – A discursive approach to memory, metaphors and religious identifications. European Journal of Cultural Studies23, 749–767. DOI: 10.1177/1367549419869352.
34.
MalkkiL (1995) Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
ManciniTSibillaFArgiropoulosD, et al. (2019) The opportunities and risks of mobile phones for refugees’ experience: a scoping review. PLoS One14(12): e0225684.
36.
MarinoS (2018) Digital food and foodways: How online food practices and narratives shape the Italian diaspora in London. Journal of Material Culture23(3): 263–279.
37.
MarwickAEboydd (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13: 114–133.
38.
Mayer-SchonbergerV (2011) Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
McKemmishS (2005) Traces: document, record, archive, archives. In: McKemmishSPiggottMReedB, et al. (eds). Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. South Wales: Centre for Information Studies: Charles Sturt University, pp. 1–20.
40.
NikunenK (2019) Once a refugee: selfie activism, visualized citizenship and the space of appearance. Popular Communication17(2): 154–170.
41.
ÖzkulDHumphreysL (2015) Record and remember: memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication3(3): 351–365.
42.
ParentNShapkaJ (2020) Moving beyond addiction: an attachment theory framework for understanding young adults’ relationships with their smartphones. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies2: 179–185.
43.
RaeMHolmanRNetheryA (2018) Self-represented witnessing: the use of social media by asylum seekers in Australia’s offshore immigration detention centres. Media, Culture & Society40(4): 479–495.
44.
ReadingA (2011) The London bombings: mobile witnessing, mortal bodies and globital time. Memory Studies4(3): 298, 311.
45.
RedwineG (2015) Personal Digital Archiving. Digital Preservation Coalition. Salisbury, UK: Charles Beagrie Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/twr15-01
46.
RisamR (2018) Now you see them: self-representation and the refugee selfie. PopularCommunication16(1), 58–71.
47.
SeuferlingP (2019) ‘We demand better ways to communicate’: pre-digital media practices in refugee camps. Media and Communication7(2): 207–217.
48.
SigonaN (2014) The politics of refugee voices. In: Fiddian-QasmiyehELoescherGLongK, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 369–382.
49.
SmetsK (2018) The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: understanding “connected refugees” through a non-media-centric and local approach. Communications43(1): 113–123.
50.
StavinohaL (2019) Communicative acts of citizenship: contesting Europe’s border in and through the media. International Journal of Communication13: 1212–1230.
51.
TwigtMMangalousiD2018) The mediation of hope: digital technologies and affective affordances within Iraqi refugee households in Jordan. Social Media + Society. 1–14 January–March.
52.
van DijckJ (2007) Mediated Memories in the Digital Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53.
WaltersW (2015) Migration, vehicles, and politics: three theses on viapolitics. European Journal of Social Theory18(4): 469–488.
54.
WhiteMA (2014) Archives of intimacy and trauma: queer migration documents as technologies of affect. Radical History Review2014: 75–93.
55.
WittebornS (2019) The digital gift and aspirational mobility. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(6): 754–769.
56.
WittebornS (2015) Becoming (im)perceptible: forced migrants and virtual practice. Journal of Refugee Studies28(3): 350–367.
