This paper examines the role and scope of eyewitness images in open-source investigation, which is becoming a prominent genre of conflict reporting in its own right. Based on interviews with journalists at the Visual Investigations Unit at The New York Times and a textual analysis of their video reports, the paper sheds light on the paradoxical working of the genre, which simultaneously opens up and limits opportunities for eyewitness images as a platform for voice. The paper thus argues that despite the journalists’ commitment to innovation, the logics of institutions, the corporate ethos of social media platforms, and the pervasive power of geopolitics continue to shape the articulation, recognition, and agency of voice.
AllanS. (2013). Citizen Witnessing: Revisioning Journalism in Times of Crises. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
2.
AllanS.ZelizerB. (2004). Rules of Engagement: Journalism and War. In AllanS.ZelizerB. (Eds.), Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
Anden-PapadopolousK. (2020). The “Image-as-Forensic-Evidence” Economy in the Post-2011 Syrian Conflict: The Power and Constraints of Contemporary Practices of Video Activism. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5072–5091.
4.
Anden-PapadopolousK.PanttiM. (2011). Introduction. In Anden-PapadopolousK.PanttiM. (eds), Amateur Images and Global News (pp. 9–20) Bristol, UK: Intellect Ltd.
BanchickA. V. (2020). Disappearing Acts: Content Moderation and Emergent Practices to Preserve At-Risk Human Rights-Related Content. New Media & Society. OnlineFirst. 10.1177/1461444820912724
7.
BockM. A. (2020). Looking Up, Talking Back: Voice and Visibility as a Digital Human Right. Surveillance & Society, 18(3), 409–412.
8.
ButlerJ. (2004). Precarious Life: The Power of Morning and Violence. New York, NY: Verso.
ChouliarakiL. (2013). Re-mediation, Inter-mediation, Trans-mediation: The Cosmopolitan Trajectories of Convergent Journalism. Journalism Studies, 14(2), 267–283.
11.
ConradD. (2018). Misguided Benevolence: How “Moments of Need” Came to Motivate American Journalism. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
12.
CouldryN. (2015). Alternative Media and Voice. In AttonC. (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media (pp. 43–52). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CouldryN. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. London, UK: Sage.
14.
DastonL.GalisonP. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Della RattaD. (2018). Shooting a Revolution: Visual Media and Warfare in Syria. London, UK: Pluto Press.
16.
DobsonA. (2012). Listening: The New Democratic Deficit. Political Studies, 60, 843–859.
17.
DubberleyS.KoenigA.MurrayD. (2020). Digital Witness: Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation, and Accountability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
GatesK. (2020). Media Evidence and Forensic Journalism. Surveillance & Society, 18(3), 403–408.
19.
HonnethA. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
HongS. (2020). Technologies of Speculation: The Limits of Knowledge in a Data-Driven Society. New York, NY: New York University Press.
21.
JacksonJ. (2013). Thin Description: Ethnography and the African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
KamelY. (2014). Reporting a Revolution and Its Aftermath: When Activists Drive News Coverage. In ThorsenE.AllanS. (Eds). Citizen Journalism: Global Perspectives. Vol. 2 (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Peter LangPublishing.
KoettlC.MurrayD.DubberleyS. (2020). Open Source Investigation for Human Rights Reporting: A Brief History. In DubberleyS.KoenigA.MurrayD. (Eds.), Digital Witness: Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation and Accountability. (pp. 12–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
McPhersonE.ThorntonI. GMahmoudiM. (2020). Open Source Investigations and Technology-driven Knowledge Controversy in Human Rights Fact-finding. In DubberleyS.KoenigA.MurrayD. (Eds.), Digital Witness: Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation and Accountability (pp. 68–86). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
MortensenM. (2015). Journalism and Eyewitness Images: Digital Media, Participation and Conflict. London, UK: Routledge.
27.
NobleS. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. York, NY: New York University Press.
28.
PowellW.W.DiMaggioP. J. (1983). Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
29.
PowellW.W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
PowersM. (2018). NGOs as Newsmakers: The Changing Landscape of International News.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
31.
RistovskaS. (2016). Strategic Witnessing in an Age of Video Activism. Media, Culture & Society, 38(7), 1034–1047.
32.
RistovskaS. (2019). Human Rights Collectives as Visual Experts: The Case of Syrian Archive. Visual Communication, 18(3), 333–351.
33.
RistovskaS. (2021). Seeing Human Rights: Video Activism as a Proxy Profession. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
RyfeD. (2016). News Institutions. In WitschgeT., AndersonC. W.,DomingoD., et al (eds), The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 370–382). London: Sage.
35.
SilvermanC. (2014). Verification Handbook: A Definitive Guide to Verifying Digital Content for Emergency Coverage, for Emergency Coverage. Maastricht, Netherlands: European Journalism Center. http://verificationhandbook.com/book/
TufekciZ. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
38.
YazbeckN. (2020). What We Talk About When We Talk About Journalism. Unpublished. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
39.
WardleC.DubberleyS.BrownP.D. (2014). Amateur Footage: A Global Study of User- Generated Content in TV and Online News Output. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University. DOI: 10.7916/D88S526V
40.
WardleC. (2018). How Newsrooms Use Eyewitness Media. In RistovskaS.PriceM. (Eds.), Visual Imagery and Human Rights Practice (299–308). New York, NY: Palgrave.
41.
WeizmanE. (2017). Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. NY, NY: Zone Books.
42.
WitschgeT.AndersonC.W.DomingoD., et al. (2016). The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism. London, UK: Sage.
43.
ZelizerB. (2010). About to Die: How News Images Move the Public. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44.
ZelizerB. (1995). Words Against Images: Positioning Newswork in the Age of Photography. In HardtHBrennenB. (Eds.), Newsworkers: Towards a History of the Rank and File (pp. 135–159). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
ZuboffS. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
