Interest in news literacy inside and outside the academy has grown alongside related concerns about the quality of news and information available. Attempts to fully define, explicate and operationalize news literacy, however, are scattered. Drawing on literature across journalism and mass communication, we propose a definition of news literacy that combines knowledge of news production, distribution and consumption with skills that help audiences assert control over their relationship with news. We propose that knowledge and skills should be conceptualized across five domains: context, creation, content, circulation and consumption. This explication offers a clear, concise and cohesive path for research about news literacy, especially empirical testing to evaluate news literacy and its effectiveness in contributing to relevant behaviours. This framework also offers a consistent, yet flexible, approach to measuring news literacy across diverse contexts.
AjzenI (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology32(4): 665–683.
2.
AjzenI (2011) The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health26: 1113–1127.
3.
AmazeenMABucyEP (2019) Conferring resistance to digital disinformation: The inoculating influence of procedural news knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media63(3): 415–432.
4.
American Society of News Editors (2017) ASNE, Google News Lab release 2017 diversity survey results with interactive website. Available at: http://asne.org/diversity-survey-2017 (accessed 15 August 2019).
5.
ArmstrongCLMcAdamsMJCainJ (2015) What is news? Audiences may have their own idea. Atlantic Journal of Communication23(2): 81–98.
6.
ArugueteNCalvoE (2018) Time to #protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication68(3): 480–502.
7.
AshleyS (2020) News Literacy and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
8.
AshleySMakslACraftS (2013) Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator68(1): 7–21.
9.
AshleySMakslACraftS (2017) News media literacy and political engagement: What’s the connection?Journal of Media Literacy Education9(1): 79–98.
10.
AufderheidePFirestoneC (1993) Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Queenstown, MD: Aspen Institute.
11.
BagdikianBH (2004) The New Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
12.
BhandariM (2018) Social media cues and news site name: What do they mean for online news perception. Newspaper Research Journal39(2): 169–179.
13.
BlomR (2021) Believing false political headlines and discrediting truthful political headlines: The interaction between news source trust and news content expectancy. Journalism22(3): 821–837.
14.
BulgerMDavisonP (2018) The promises, challenges, and futures of media literacy. Data & Society Research Institute. Available at: datasociety.net (accessed 15 August 2019)
15.
CallisonCYoungML (2020) Reckoning: Journalism’s Limits and Possibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
ClineA (2009) Bias. In: EadieWF (ed.) 21st Century Communication: A Reference Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.479–486.
17.
CoddingtonM (2019) Aggregating the News: Secondhand Knowledge and the Erosion of Journalistic Authority. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
CraftSAshleySMakslA (2016a) Elements of news literacy: A focus group study of how teenagers define news and why they consume it. Electronic News10(3): 143–160.
19.
CraftSAshleySMakslA (2017) News media literacy and conspiracy theory endorsement. Communication and the Public2(4): 388–401.
20.
CraftSVosTPWolfgangJD (2016b) Reader comments as press criticism: Implications for the journalistic field. Journalism17(6): 677–693.
21.
DiakopoulosN (2019) Automating the News: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Media. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
DixonTL (2008) Crime news and racialized beliefs: Understanding the relationship between local news viewing and perceptions of African Americans and crime. Journal of Communication58(1): 106–125.
23.
DomingoDMasipPMeijerIC (2015) Tracing digital news networks. Digital Journalism3(1): 53–67.
24.
EdgerlySVragaEK (2019) News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism20(6): 807–826.
25.
FieldingJA (2019) Rethinking CRAAP: Getting students thinking like fact-checkers in evaluating web sources. College & Research Libraries News80(11): 620–622.
FlemingJ (2014) Media literacy, news literacy, or news appreciation? A case study of the news literacy program at stony brook university. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator69(2): 146–165.
28.
GildeZúñigaHHinsleyA (2013) The press versus the public. Journalism Studies14(6): 926–942.
29.
GuntherAC (1988) Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly65: 279–287.
30.
HamadaBHughesSHanitzschT, et al. (2019) Editorial autonomy: Journalists’ perceptions of their freedoms. In: HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al (eds.) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.133–159.
31.
HanitzschTRamaprasadJArroyaveJ, et al. (2019a) Perceived influences: Journalists’ awareness of pressures of their work. In: HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al (eds.) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.103–132.
32.
HanitzschTVosTPStandaertO, et al. (2019b) Role orientations: Journalists’ views on their place in society. In: HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al (eds.) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.161–197.
33.
HeiderDMcCombsMPoindexterPM (2005) What the public expects of local news: Views on public and traditional journalism. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly82: 952–967.
34.
IyengarS (1994) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Jones-JangSMMortensenTLiuJ (2021) Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist65(2): 371–388.
36.
KahneJBowyerB (2017) Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal54(1): 3–34.
37.
KovachBRosenstielT (2007) The Elements of Journalism. New York: Three Rivers Press.
38.
LewisSCWestlundO (2015) Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in cross-media news work. Digital Journalism3(1): 19–37.
39.
MakslAAshleySCraftS (2015) Measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education6(3): 29–45.
40.
MalikMMCortesiSGasserU (2013) The challenges of defining ‘news literacy.’ Cambridge: Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
41.
McGrewSBreakstoneJOrtegaT, et al. (2018) Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education46(2): 165–193.
MessingSWestwoodSJ (2014) Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting new online. Communication Research41(8): 1042–1063.
44.
MihailidisPTheveninB (2013) Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in a participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist57: 1611–1622.
45.
MoyPTewksburyDRinkeEM (2016) Agenda setting, priming, and framing. In: JensenKBRothenbuhlerEWPooleyJD, et al (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
46.
NechushtaiELewisSC (2019) What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior90: 298–307.
47.
NelsonJLWebsterJG (2017) The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media and Society3(3): 1–13.
NobleSU (2018) Algorithms of Oppression. New York: NYU Press.
52.
PennycookGRandDG (2019) Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition188: 39–50.
53.
PerloffRM (2015) A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society18(6): 701–729.
54.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.
55.
PotterWJ (2004) Theory of Media Literacy: A Cognitive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
PotterWJ (2019) Media Literacy, 9th edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
PotterWThaiCL (2019) Reviewing media literacy intervention studies for validity. Review of Communication Research7: 38–66.
58.
SarapinSHMorrisPLVoN (2017) The biggest lie on the web: Coming to terms with the failure to read through the lens of the First Amendment. First Amendment Studies51(2): 86–108.
59.
ShoemakerPJCohenAA (2006) News Around the World: Content, Practitioners, and the Public. New York: Routledge.
60.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (2014) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
61.
ShoemakerPJVosTP (2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
62.
SingerJB (2014) User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society16(1): 55–73.
63.
SingerJBDomingoDHeinonenA, et al. (2011) Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
64.
StordyP (2015) Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation71(3): 456–476.
65.
StroudNJ (2011) Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 755–769.
67.
ThorsonKWellsC (2015) How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In: VosTPHeinderyckxF (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition. New York: Routledge, pp.25–44.
68.
ThorsonKWellsC (2016) Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory26(3): 309–328.
69.
TullyMVragaEK (2018) A mixed-methods approach to examining the relationship between news media literacy and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication12: 766–787.
70.
TullyMVragaEKSmithsonAB (2020) News media literacy, perceptions of bias, and interpretation of news. Journalism12(2): 209–226.
71.
ValloneRPRossLLepperMR (1985) The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49(3): 577–585.
72.
Van der WurffRSchoenbachK (2014) Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists: What does the audience expect from good journalism?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(3): 433–451.
73.
VosTPCraftSAshleyS (2012) New media, old criticism: Bloggers’ press criticism and the journalistic field. Journalism13(7): 850–868.
74.
VragaEKTullyM (2015) Media literacy messages and hostile media perceptions: Processing of nonpartisan versus partisan political information. Mass Communication and Society18: 422–448.
75.
VragaEKTullyMKotcherJE, et al. (2015) A multi-dimensional approach to measuring news media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education7(3): 41–53.
76.
VragaEKTullyMMakslA, et al. (2020) Theorizing news literacy behaviors. Communication Theory31(1): 1–21.
77.
WallaceJ (2018) Modelling contemporary gatekeeping. Digital Journalism6(3): 274–293.
