Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

News media seem to have insufficient knowledge on how to reach Millennials. An important question is how professional journalism can prevent the disillusion that a growing number of Millennials experience when consuming news. Constructive journalism is often propagated as a way to improve the well-being and engagement of readers. To test this, the current study investigated the effects of constructive news on emotions and online engagement. In an experiment, 20–40-year-old participants (n = 341) read a story containing constructive elements or not. Findings showed constructive news elicited lower levels of negative and higher levels of positive and inspirational emotional responses. Furthermore, reading constructive news partly affected readers’ actual online behaviour: Millennials who read the constructive news ‘liked’ this news more often. These results suggest that constructive journalism might be a viable strategy to attract younger news users, especially when the news topic is relevant to their lives.

Keywords

constructive journalism emotions engagement Millennials news effects news users

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baden

McIntyre

Homberg

(2019) The impact of constructive news on affective and behavioural responses. Journalism Studies 20(13): 1940–1959.

Boulianne

(2015) Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society 18(5): 524–538.

Bro

(2019) Constructive journalism: Proponents, precedents, and principles. Journalism 20(4): 504–519.

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2016) Standaard Onderwijsindeling 2016-2017. Den Haag. Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/methoden/classificaties/onderwijs-en-beroepen/standaard-onderwijsindeling–soi–/standaard-onderwijsindeling-2016

CG Research (n.d.) Available at: https://www.cgresearch.nl/

Costera Meijer

(2007) The paradox of popularity. Journalism Studies 8(1): 96–116.

Costera Meijer

Groot Kormelink

(2015) Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Digital Journalism 3(5): 664–679.

Curran

Coen

Aalberg

, et al. (2013) Internet revolution revisited: A comparative study of online news. Media, Culture & Society 35(7): 880–897.

Curry

Stroud

McGregor

(2016) Solutions Journalism and News Engagement. Available at: https://engagingnewsproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ENP-Solutions-Journalism-News-Engagement.pdf

10.

Drok

Hermans

Kats

(2018) Decoding youth DNA: The relationship between social engagement and news interest, news media use and news preferences of Dutch millennials. Journalism 19(5): 699–717.

11.

Field

(2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

12.

Fredrickson

(2000) Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition and Emotion 14(4): 577–606.

13.

Fredrickson

(2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist 56(3): 218–226.

14.

Fredrickson

(2004) The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359(1449): 1367–1377.

15.

Galan

Ossermans

Parker

, et al. (2019) How Young People Consume News and the Implications for Mainstream Media. Cham. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90281-4

16.

Garland

Fredrickson

Kring

, et al. (2010) Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review 30(7): 849–864.

17.

Gyldensted

(2015) From Mirrors to Movers. Five Elements of Positive Psychology in Constructive Journalism. Charleston, SC: GGroup Publishing.

18.

Haagerup

(2017) Constructive News. How to Save the Media and Democracy with Journalism of Tomorrow. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

19.

Yang

, et al. (2018) Decline in news content engagement or news medium engagement? A longitudinal analysis of news engagement since the rise of social and mobile media 2009–2012. Journalism 19(5): 718–739.

20.

Hargittai

Shaw

(2013) Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57(2): 115–134.

21.

Hayes

(2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

22.

Hermans

Drok

(2018) Placing constructive journalism in context. Journalism Practice 12(6): 679–694.

23.

Hermans

Gyldensted

(2019) Elements of constructive journalism: Characteristics, practical application and audience valuation. Journalism 20(4): 535–551.

24.

Kahneman

Fredrickson

Schreiber

, et al. (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science 4(6): 401–405.

25.

Keltner

Oatley

Jenkins

(2014) Understanding Emotions. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

26.

Kleemans

de Leeuw

RNH

Gerritsen

, et al. (2017) Children’s responses to negative news: The effects of constructive reporting in newspaper stories for children. Journal of Communication 67(5): 781–802.

27.

Kleemans

Dohmen

Schlindwein

, et al. (2019) Children’s cognitive responses to constructive television news. Journalism 20(4): 568–582.

28.

Kleemans

Schlindwein

Dohmen

(2017) Preadolescents’ emotional and prosocial responses to negative TV news: Investigating the beneficial effects of constructive reporting and peer discussion. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 46(9): 2060–2072.

29.

Kovach

Rosenstiel

(2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

30.

Krebs

Lischka

(2019) Is audience engagement worth the buzz? The value of audience engagement, comment reading, and content for online news brands. Journalism 20(6): 714–732.

31.

Lecheler

Schuck

ART

de Vreese

(2013) Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research 38(2): 189–209.

32.

Lee

(2015) News engagement versus news consumption. Electronic News 9(2): 75–90.

33.

McIntyre

(2015) Constructive journalism: The effects of positive emotions and solution information in news stories. PhD Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

34.

McIntyre

(2019) Solutions journalism. Journalism Practice 13(1): 16–34.

35.

McIntyre

Gibson

(2016) Positive news makes readers feel good: A “silver-lining” approach to negative news can attract audiences. Southern Communication Journal 81(5): 304–315.

36.

McIntyre

Gyldensted

(2018) Positive psychology as a theoretical foundation for constructive journalism. Journalism Practice 12(6): 662–678.

37.

McIntyre

Sobel

(2017) Motivating news audiences: Shock them or provide them with solutions? Communication & Society 30(1): 39–56.

38.

McQuail

(2013) Journalism and Society. London: Sage Publication.

39.

Meier

(2018) How does the audience respond to constructive journalism?: Two experiments with multifaceted results. Journalism Practice 12(6): 764–780.

40.

Mindich

DTZ

(2005) Tuned Out: Why Americans Under 40 Don’t Follow the News. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

41.

Nelson

(2019) The next media regime: The pursuit of ‘audience engagement’ in journalism. Journalism. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919862375

42.

Newman

Fletcher

Kalogeropoulos

, et al. (2017) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. 25 February. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/DigitalNewsReport2017web_0.pdf

43.

Newman

Fletcher

Kalogeropoulos

, et al. (2019) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

44.

Purdy

(2017) Internet use and civic engagement: A structural equation approach. Computers in Human Behavior 71: 318–326.

45.

Qualtrics (n.d.) The System of Action. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com/

46.

Reinecke

Eden

(2017) Media use and well-being. Journal of Media Psychology 29(3): 111–114.

47.

Seligman

MEP

Csikszentmihalyi

(2000) Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55(1): 5–14.

48.

Shehata

Ekström

Olsson

(2016) Developing self-actualizing and dutiful citizens: Testing the AC-DC model using panel data among adolescents. Communication Research 43(8): 1141–1169.

49.

The Media Insight Project (2015) How Millennials Get News: Inside the Habits of America’s First Digital Generation. Arlington, VA. Available at: http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Media-Insight-Millennials-Report-March-2015.pdf

50.

Thompson

(2007) Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 38(2): 227–242.

51.

Vogel

(2014) Talfahrt Der Tagespresse: Eine Ursachensuche (The Daily Press Going Down. An Inquiry into the Causes). Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/akademie/10790.pdf

52.

Watson

Clark

Tellegen

(1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6): 1063–1070.

53.

Zuckerman

(2014) New media, new civics? Policy & Internet 6(2): 151–168.

Interest matters: The effects of constructive news reporting on Millennials’ emotions and engagement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References