As journalism undergoes widespread changes, it finds itself in a ‘new normal’. Research seeking to understand these changes by surveying journalists faces new methodological hurdles that span different stages of the survey process. This article identifies the key contemporary challenges when it comes to sampling, instrument design, and distribution. Best research practices in identifying a target population, sampling, selecting or developing measures, and maximizing the likelihood of participation are presented and discussed. Advice is also offered to help peer reviewers identify common shortcomings in surveys of journalists and encourage authors to engage with the limitations of their work.
AldridgeMEvettsJ (2003) Rethinking the concept of professionalism: The case of journalism. The British Journal of Sociology54(4): 547–564.
2.
BarkhoL (ed.) (2017) Towards a Praxis-based Media and Journalism Research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Belair-GagnonVHoltonAE (2018) Boundary work, interloper media, and analytics in newsrooms. Digital Journalism6(4): 492–508.
4.
Belair-GagnonVZamithRHoltonAE (2020) Role orientations and audience metrics in newsrooms: An examination of journalistic perceptions and their drivers. Digital Journalism8(3): 347–366.
5.
BellEJOwenTBrownPD, et al. (2017) The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism. New York: Tow Center for Journalism.
6.
BlessHSchwarzN (2010) Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology42: 319–373.
7.
CarlsonM (2018) The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies19(13): 1879–1888.
8.
CarlsonMLewisSC (2015) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CarlsonMRobinsonSLewisSC, et al. (2018) Journalism studies and its core commitments: The making of a communication field. Journal of Communication68(1): 6–25.
10.
ChangTKLeeJW (1992) Factors affecting gatekeepers’ selection of foreign news: A national survey of newspaper editors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly69(3): 554–561.
11.
ClaymanSELoebL (2018) Polar questions, response preference, and the tasks of political positioning in journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction51(2): 127–144.
12.
CulbertsonHM (1981) Reporters and editors: Some differences in perspective. Newspaper Research Journal2(2): 17–27.
13.
DahmenNSAbdenourJMcIntyreK, et al. (2018) Covering mass shootings. Journalism Practice12(4) 456–476.
14.
DennisEEMcCartneyJ (1979) Science journalists on metropolitan dailies: Methods, values and perceptions of their work. The Journal of Environmental Education10(3): 9–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1979.9942627
15.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
16.
DeuzeM (2008) The changing context of news work: Liquid journalism for a monitorial citizenry. International Journal of Communication2: 848–865. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/290
17.
DillmanDA (2000) Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed.Brisbane: Wiley.
18.
FawziN (2018) Beyond policy agenda-setting: Political actors’ and journalists’ perceptions of news media influence across all stages of the political process. Information, Communication and Society21(8): 1134–1150.
19.
FinnemanTJenkinsJ (2018) Sexism on the set: Gendered expectations of TV broadcasters in a social media world. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media62(3): 479–494.
20.
FowlerFJ (2013) Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
GriffinDJBolkanSDahlbachBJ (2018) Scholarly productivity in communication studies: Five-year review 2012–2016. Communication Education67(1): 88–101.
23.
HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al. (2019) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
HowardPNDuffyAFreelonD, et al. (2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring?SSRN. Available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595096
25.
IhlebækKALarssonAO (2018) Learning by doing. Journalism Studies19(6): 905–920.
26.
KeuschF (2012) How to increase response rates in list-based web survey samples. Social Science Computer Review30(3): 380–388.
27.
KrumsvikAH (2018) Redefining user involvement in digital news media. Journalism Practice12(1): 19–31.
28.
LewisSCZamithR (2017) On the worlds of journalism. In: BoczkowskiPJAndersonCW (eds) Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–128.
29.
LiuHLLoVH (2018) An integrated model of workload, autonomy, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention among Taiwanese reporters. Asian Journal of Communication28(2): 153–169.
30.
MenkeMKinnebrockSKretzschmarS, et al. (2018) Convergence culture in European newsrooms. Journalism Studies19(6): 881–904.
31.
MolyneuxL (2014). Reporters’ smartphone use improves quality of work. Newspaper Research Journal35(4): 83–97.
32.
MolyneuxLLewisSCHoltonAE (2019) Media work, identity, and the motivations that shape branding practices among journalists: An explanatory framework. New Media & Society21(4): 836–855.
33.
ÖrnebringH (2018) Journalists thinking about precarity: Making sense of the “new normal.”International Symposium on Online Journalism8(1): 109–126.
34.
ÖrnebringHMelladoC (2018) Valued skills among journalists: An exploratory comparison of six European nations. Journalism19(4): 445–463.
35.
OttoLPGloggerI (2020) Expanding the methodological toolbox: Factorial surveys in journalism research. Journalism Studies21(7): 947–965.
36.
PasekJKrosnickJA (2010) Optimizing survey questionnaire design in political science: Insights from psychology. In: LeighleyJE (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–50.
37.
ReichZ (2011) Source credibility and journalism. Journalism Practice5(1): 51–67.
38.
RevillaMOchoaC (2017) Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research59(5): 557–565.
TandocEC (2018) Five ways BuzzFeed is preserving (or transforming) the journalistic field. Journalism19(2): 200–216.
45.
TernesBPeterlinLJReinardyS (2018) Newsroom workers’ job satisfaction contingent on position and adaptation to digital disruption. Journalism Practice12(4): 497–508.
46.
UsherN (2018) Breaking news production processes in us metropolitan newspapers: Immediacy and journalistic authority. Journalism19(1): 21–36.
WatsonBRZamithRCavanahS, et al. (2015) Are demographics adequate controls for cell-phone-only coverage bias in mass communication research?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(3): 723–743.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1986) The American Journalist: A Portrait of U.S. News People and Their Work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
51.
WeaverDHWilhoitGC (1996) The American Journalist in the 1990s: U.S. News People at the End of an ERA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52.
WeaverDHBeamRABrownleeBJ, et al. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at The Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
WillnatLWeaverDHWilhoitGC (2017) The American Journalist in the Digital Age: A Half-Century Perspective. New York: Peter Lang.
54.
ZamithR (2018) Quantified audiences in news production. Digital Journalism6(4): 418–435.
55.
ZamithRBraunJA (2019) Technology and journalism. In: VosTPHanuschFGeertsema-SlighM, et al. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies (pp. 1–8). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
56.
ZamithRBelair-GagnonVLewisSC (2019) Constructing audience quantification: Social influences and the development of norms about audience analytics and metrics. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 16 October 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1461444819881735
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
