Research on incivility has focused on individual differences or message characteristics that affect perceptions of incivility. Given the potential consequences of incivility in news spaces, it is essential to extend research on incivility perceptions to characteristics of digital news environments. We explore how the perception and availability of comment section features (i.e. comment moderation and anonymity), as well as a feeling of connection with a comment section community, relate to commenters and comment readers’ incivility perceptions. By recruiting survey respondents from a population of individuals who read or post comments on one of 20 diverse news sites, we demonstrate that features of commenting spaces, and especially the feelings of connection formed in those spaces, relate to perceptions of incivility. We find that perceptions of comment section features relate to perceptions of incivility more so than the actual availability of these features. Our findings offer implications for newsrooms looking to foster perceptions of civility in comment sections and protect the value of their journalism.
AartsHDijksterhuisA (2003) The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(1): 18–28.
2.
AndersonAABrossardDScheufeleDA, et al. (2014) The ‘nasty effect’: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 373–387.
3.
AndersonAAYeoSKBrossardD, et al. (2016) Toxic talk: How online incivility can undermine perceptions of media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30(1): 156–168.
4.
AndersonB (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.
5.
BarnesR (2016) The ‘imagined community’ of readers of hyperlocal news: A case study of Baristanet. Journal of Alternative and Community Media1: 84–96.
6.
BaumeisterRF (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin91(1): 3–26.
7.
Ben-PorathEN (2008) Codes of professionalism; norms of conversation: How political interviews shape public attitudes toward journalists. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
8.
BlanchardALMarkusML (2004) The experienced sense of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems35(1): 64–79.
9.
ChenGM (2017) Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk. Berlin: Springer.
10.
ChenGMLuS (2017) Online political discourse: Exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreement in news website comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61(1): 108–125.
11.
ChenGMChockTMGozigianH, et al. (2011) Personalizing news websites attracts young readers. Newspaper Research Journal32(4): 22–38.
12.
CoeKKenskiKRainsSA (2014) Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication64(4): 658–679.
13.
ColesBAWestM (2016) Weaving the internet together: Imagined communities in newspaper comment threads. Computers in Human Behavior60: 44–53.
FreelonD (2015) Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion. New Media & Society17(5): 772–791.
16.
GrieveRIndianMWitteveenK, et al. (2013) Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online?Computers in Human Behavior29(3): 604–609.
17.
HoppTSantanaABarkerV (2018) Who finds value in news comment communities? An analysis of the influence of individual user, perceived news site quality, and site type factors. Telematics and Informatics35(5): 1237–1248.
18.
HutchensMJSilvaDEHmielowskiJD, et al. (2019) What’s in a username? Civility, group identification, and norms. Journal of Information Technology & Politics16(3): 203–218.
KenskiKCoeKRainsSA (2017) Perceptions of uncivil discourse online: An examination of types and predictors. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 3April. DOI: 10.1177/0093650217699933.
21.
KimYCShinEChoA, et al. (2019) SNS dependency and community engagement in urban neighborhoods: The moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research46(1): 7–32.
KrebsILischkaJA (2019) Is audience engagement worth the buzz? The value of audience engagement, comment reading, and content for online news brands. Journalism20(6): 714–732.
24.
KsiazekTB (2015) Civil interactivity: How news organizations’ commenting policies explain civility and hostility in user comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59(4): 556–573.
25.
MaWWChanA (2014) Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior39: 51–58.
26.
MeltzerK (2015) Journalistic concern about uncivil political talk in digital news media: Responsibility, credibility, and academic influence. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(1): 85–107.
27.
MikalJPRiceREKentRG, et al. (2016) 100 million strong: A case study of group identification and deindividuation on Imgur.com. New Media & Society18(11): 2485–2506.
28.
MitchelsteinE (2011) Catharsis and community: Divergent motivations for audience participation in online newspapers and blogs. International Journal of Communication5: 2014–2034.
29.
MuddimanAStroudNJ (2017) News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication67(4): 586–609.
30.
MuddimanAPond-CobbJMatsonJ (2017) Article negativity bias or backlash: Interaction with civil and uncivil online political news content. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 6January. DOI: 10.1177/0093650216685625.
31.
MutzDC (2015) In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
MutzDCReevesB (2005) The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review99(1): 1–15.
33.
NagyPNeffG (2015) Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society1(2): 1–9.
34.
NahSChungDS (2012) When citizens meet both professional and citizen journalists: Social trust, media credibility, and perceived journalistic roles among online community news readers. Journalism13(6): 714–730.
35.
NekmatE (2012) Message expression effects in online social communication. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(2): 203–224.
36.
NeubaumGKrämerNC (2017) Monitoring the opinion of the crowd: Psychological mechanisms underlying public opinion perceptions on social media. Media Psychology20(3): 502–531.
37.
NorrisP (2002) The bridging and bonding role of online communities. The International Journal of Press/Politics7(3): 3–13.
38.
PapacharissiZ (2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society6(2): 259–283.
39.
ParkDSacharSDiakopoulosN, et al. (2016) Supporting comment moderators in identifying high quality online news comments. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conferences on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1114–1125. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858389
40.
PostmesTSpearsRLeaM (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research25(6): 689–715.
41.
RainsSA (2007) The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research34(1): 100–125.
42.
RainsSAKenskiKCoeK, et al. (2017) Incivility and political identity on the internet: Intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication22(4): 163–178.
43.
RösnerLKrämerNC (2016) Verbal venting in the social web: Effects of anonymity and group norms on aggressive language use in online comments. Social Media + Society2(3): 1–13.
44.
RoweI (2015) Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society18(2): 121–138.
45.
RuizCDomingoDMicóJL, et al. (2011) Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics16(4): 463–487.
46.
SantanaAD (2014) Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice8(1): 18–33.
47.
SmithESBresslerA (2013) Who taught you to talk like that? The university and online political discourse. Journal of Political Science Education9(4): 453–473.
48.
SpearsRLeaM (1994) Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research21(4): 427–459.
49.
SpringerNEngelmannIPfaffingerC (2015) User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read. Information, Communication & Society18(7): 798–815.
SukumaranAVezichSMcHughM, et al. (2011) Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems – CHI’: 11, 7–12 May, pp. 3401–3410. New York: ACM. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979450
52.
SulerJ (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior7(3): 321–326.
53.
Van DuynEPeacockCStroudNJ (2019) The gender gap in online news comment sections. Social Science Computer Review. Epub ahead of print 26July. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319864876.
54.
ZiegeleMBreinerTQuiringO (2014) What creates interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items. Journal of Communication64(6): 1111–1138.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
