It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics

Abstract

This study examines how market orientation affects the use of web analytics in newsrooms. The researcher conducted 57 in-depth interviews with journalists working full time in United States-based news organizations. These organizations varied by market orientation: strongly market oriented, somewhat strongly market oriented, somewhat weakly market oriented, and weakly market oriented. Using market theory for news production as a framework, this study found that prior research correctly identified how newsrooms utilize analytics, but did not necessarily illustrate the nuances in how organizations utilized analytics differently depending on market orientation. Finally, the piece extends and discusses the utility of market theory for news production.

Keywords

Analytics in-depth interviews journalism studies market orientation media economics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bagdikian

(2004) The New Media Monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Baker

(1994) Advertising and a Democratic Press. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Beam

(1998) What it means to be a market-oriented newspaper. Newspaper Research Journal 19(3): 2–20.

Beam

(2003) Content differences between daily newspapers with strong and weak market orientations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80(2): 368–390.

Bright

Nicholls

(2014) The life and death of political news: Measuring the impact of the audience agenda using online data. Social Science Computer Review 32(2): 170–181.

Downs

(2012) Executive compensation: In a culture of greed and selfishness is there room for a theory of ‘enough’. Faulkner Law Review 4(1): 35–71.

Emerson

Fretz

Shaw

(2011) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ferrucci

(2015a) Follow the leader: How leadership can affect the future of community journalism. Community Journalism 4(2): 19–35.

Ferrucci

(2015b) Murder incorporated: Market orientation and coverage of the Annie Le investigation. Electronic News 9(2): 108–121.

10.

Ferrucci

(2015c) Primary differences: How market orientation can influence content. Journal of Media Practice 16(3): 195–210.

11.

Ferrucci

(2015d) Public journalism no more: The digitally native news nonprofit and public service journalism. Journalism 16(7): 904–919.

12.

Ferrucci

(2017a) Exploring public service journalism: Digitally native news nonprofits and engagement. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 94(1): 355–370.

13.

Ferrucci

(2017b) Technology allows audience role in news construction. Newspaper Research Journal 38(1): 79–89.

14.

Ferrucci

(2018) Money matters? Journalists’ perception of the effects of a weak market orientation. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24(4): 424–438.

15.

Ferrucci

Tandoc

Jr (2015) A tale of two newsrooms: How market orientation influences web analytics use. In: Gibbs

McKendrick

(eds) Contemporary Research Methods and Data Analytics in the News Industry. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 58–76.

16.

Ferrucci

Russell

Choi

, et al. (2017) Times are a changing: How a merger affects the construction of news processes. Journalism Studies 18(3): 247–264.

17.

Gans

(1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.

18.

Gans

(2004) Democracy and the News. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Hakan

ALP

(2015) Embedded journalism within the framework of changing ownership structure of the media. Journalism 5(6): 255–262.

20.

Hanitzsch

Hanusch

Mellado

, et al. (2011) Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies 12(3): 273–293.

21.

Hanusch

(2017) Web analytics and the functional differentiation of journalism cultures: Individual, organizational and platform-specific influences on newswork. Information, Communication & Society 20(10): 1571–1586.

22.

Hanusch

Tandoc

Jr (2017) Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation. Journalism. Epub ahead of print 21 July. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917720305.

23.

Harvey-Jordan

Long

(2001) The process and the pitfalls of semi-structured interviews. Community Practitioner 74(6): 219–221.

24.

Herman

Chomsky

(2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.

25.

Iggers

(2018) Good News, Bad News: Journalism Ethics and the Public Interest. New York: Routledge.

26.

Karlsson

Clerwall

(2013) Negotiating professional news judgment and ‘clicks’. Nordicom Review 34(2): 65–76.

27.

Kaye

Quinn

(2010) Funding Journalism in the Digital Age: Business Models, Strategies, Issues and Trends. New York: Peter Lang.

28.

Konieczna

Robinson

(2014) Emerging news non-profits: A case study for rebuilding community trust? Journalism 15(8): 968–986.

29.

Lacy

(1991) Effects of group ownership on daily newspaper content. Journal of Media Economics 4(1): 35–47.

30.

Lacy

Fico

Simon

(1989) Relationships among economic, newsroom, and content variables: A path model. Journal of Media Economics 2(2): 51–66.

31.

Lee

Lewis

Powers

(2014) Audience clicks and news placement: A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research 41(4): 505–530.

32.

McChesney

(1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

33.

McChesney

(2004) The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

34.

McCracken

(1988) The Long Interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

35.

MacGregor

(2007) Tracking the online audience: Metric data start a subtle revolution. Journalism Studies 8(2): 280–298.

36.

McManus

(1992) Serving the public and serving the market: A conflict of interest? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7(4): 196–208.

37.

McManus

(1994) Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

38.

Main

Baird

(1981) Elements of Microeconomics. New York: West Publishing Company.

39.

Matthews

(1996) How public ownership affects publisher autonomy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73(2): 342–353.

40.

Miles

Huberman

(1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

41.

Napoli

(2011) Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

42.

Nee

(2013) Creative destruction: An exploratory study of how digitally native news nonprofits are innovating online journalism practices. International Journal on Media Management 15(1): 3–22.

43.

Nocera

(2012) How Punch protected the Times. The New York Times, 1 October. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2012/10/02/opinion/nocera-how-punch-protected-the-times.html

44.

Painter

Ferrucci

(2018) Digital marketplace: The influence of market forces on normative role in the Internet age. In: Heider

Vanacker

(eds) Ethics for a Digital Age. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 109–124.

45.

Petre

(2015) The traffic factories: Metrics at Chartbeat, Gawker Media, and The New York Times. Report, Tow Center for Digital Journalism, New York, June.

46.

Ross

(2018) Tronc pursued by private equity firm, report says. The Street, 25 July. Available at: www.thestreet.com/markets/tronc-reportedly-pursued-by-private-equity-firm-14661628

47.

Shoemaker

Reese

(2014) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.

48.

Shoemaker

Vos

(2009) Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.

49.

Soloski

(2013) Collapse of the US newspaper industry: Goodwill, leverage and bankruptcy. Journalism 14(3): 309–329.

50.

Soloski

Martin

(2015) Sharing the pain? An examination of CEO and executive compensation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AEJMC, San Francisco, CA, August. Available at: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1036778_index.html

51.

Spradley

(1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

52.

Tandoc

Jr (2014) Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society 16(4): 559–575.

53.

Tandoc

Jr (2015) Why web analytics click: Factors affecting the ways journalists use audience metrics. Journalism Studies 16(6): 782–799.

54.

Tandoc

Jr Thomas

(2015) The ethics of web analytics: Implications of using audience metrics in news construction. Digital Journalism 3(2): 243–258.

55.

Underwood

(1995) When MBAs Rule the Newsroom. New York: Columbia University Press.

56.

Usher

(2013) Al Jazeera English online: Understanding web metrics and news production when a quantified audience is not a commodified audience. Digital Journalism 1(3): 335–351.

57.

(2014) The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism 15(8): 1094–1110.

58.

Weiss

(1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.

59.

Welbers

Van Atteveldt

Kleinnijenhuis

, et al. (2016) News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism 17(8): 1037–1053.

60.

Zamith

(2015) Editorial judgment in an age of data: How audience analytics and metrics are influencing the placement of news products. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.