This study aims to investigate the translation of attribution, one of the key journalistic conventions to ensure news credibility, in the context of South Korea. An examination on how attribution is translated can address one of the major challenges facing today’s news industry: the erosion of credibility. While the growth of new media threatens news credibility, the norms and process of news translation can aggravate this credibility. Based on the attribution principles for Korean and English news, this study compares 359 Korean-language articles and their English translations collected from the websites of South Korea’s three major newspapers to investigate whether and how the meanings and functions of attribution change in the process of translation and what impact the changes may have on news credibility. The findings show that the meanings and functions of attribution change in the process of translation, and the consequence is not insignificant because it can weaken credibility, which in turn calls for more scholarly and practical attention to the translation of attribution in this fast-changing media landscape.
AdlerR (1977) Reflections on political scandal. New York Review of Books, 8December, pp. 20–33.
2.
AltermanE (2008) Out of print: The death and life of the American newspaper. The New Yorker, 84(7): 48–59.
3.
BassnettS (2006) Introduction. In: ConwayKBassnettS (eds) Translation in Global News: Proceedings of the Conference held at the University of Warwick, 23 June 2006, Warwick Working Papers. Coventry: University of Warwick Centre for Translation and Comparative Cultural Studies, pp. 5–8.
4.
BielsaE (2007) Translation in global news agencies. Target19(1): 135–155.
5.
BielsaEBassnettS (2009) Translation in Global News. London: Routledge.
6.
BivensRK (2008) New media and journalism: Implications for autonomous practice within traditional constraints. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
7.
BoeyinkDE (1990) Anonymous sources in news stories: Justifying exceptions and limiting abuses. Journal of Mass Media Ethics5(4): 233–246.
8.
ChenYM (2009) Quotation as a key to the investigation of ideological manipulation in news trans-editing in the Taiwanese press. TTR22(2): 203–238.
9.
CollisDJOlsonPWFureyM (2009) The newspaper industry in crisis. HBS Case709–463: 1–23.
10.
CushionSLewisJ (eds.) (2010) The Rise of 24-Hour News Television: Global Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.
11.
FedlerFBenderJDavenportL, et al. (2005) Reporting for the Media, 8th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
FranklinBCarlsonM (eds.) (2011) Journalists, Sources, and Credibility: New Perspectives. New York and London: Routledge.
13.
GansHJ (1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
14.
GarrisonB (2000) Journalists’ perceptions of online information-gathering problems. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 500–514.
15.
GazianoCMcGrathK (1986) Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly63(3): 451–462.
16.
HarcupT (2014) Dictionary of Journalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
HongJM (2014a) A study on the quality of news translations by translators for news organizations in South Korea – Focusing on Chesterman’s norms of translation. The Journal of Translation Studies15(5): 287–331.
18.
HongJM (2014b) A study on the role and status of news translators in South Korea: Focusing on the case of English News. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Graduate School of Translation and Interpretation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
KeebleR (2006) The Newspapers Handbook, 4th edn.London and New York: Routledge.
21.
KimJY (2008) A comparative study of newspaper source use: The Chosun Ilbo and the New York Times. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Mass Communication, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
22.
KimYW (2004) The Accountability System of Korean Journalism. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Press Foundation.
23.
Korea Audit Bureau of Circulations (2016) 2016 Annual audit report for daily newspapers for the year 2015, 25 November. Available at: http://www.kabc.or.kr/common
24.
Korea News Editors’ Association (KNEA) (1996a [1957]) Newspaper code of ethics. Available at: http://www.editor.or.kr/ (accessed 21 January 2017).
25.
Korea News Editors’ Association (1996b [1957]) Practice guidelines of newspaper code of ethics. Available at: http://www.editor.or.kr/ (accessed 21 January 2017).
26.
LeeGHJungWK (2007) News Structure and Content of Korean and U.S. News. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Press Foundation.
NamSW (1997) Experiential Theory of Journalists. Paju, South Korea: Nanam Publishing House.
33.
NamSW (2001) Theory of News Gathering and Reporting in the Internet Era. Paju, South Korea: Nanam Publishing House.
34.
OrengoA (2005) Localising news: Translation and the ‘global-national’ dichotomy. Language and Intercultural Communication5(2): 168–187.
35.
ParkJYLeeWS (2007) Quotation & attribution: A comparative study of Korean and U.S. newspapers. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies51(6): 439–468.
36.
PriceG (2015) Opportunities and Challenges for Journalism in the Digital Age: Asian and European Perspectives. London: Chatham House.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, 2nd edn.White Plains, NY: Longman.
40.
SongYH (2005) A study on the rhetorical devices to enhance the factuality in the news of the society pages in Korean national newspapers. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies49(3): 80–104.
TsaiC (2005) Inside the television newsroom: An insider’s view of international news translation in Taiwan. Language and Intercultural Communication5(2): 145–153.
47.
TuchmanG (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology77(4): 660–679.
48.
ValdeónRA (2005a) The CNN en Español news. Perspectives13(4): 255–267.
49.
ValdeónRA (2005b) The ‘translated’ Spanish service of the BBC. Across Languages and Cultures6(2): 195–220.
50.
ValdeónRA (2015) Fifteen years of journalistic translation research and more. Perspectives23(4): 634–662.
51.
Van DijkT (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Van DoorslaerL (2010) Journalism and translation. In: GambierYVan DoorslaerL (eds) Handbook of Translation Studies, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 180–184.
53.
VuorinenE (1995) News translation as gatekeeping. In: Snell-HornbyMJettmarovaZKaindlK (eds) Translation as Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 161–171.
54.
VuorinenE (1999) Crossing cultural barriers in international news transmission: A translational approach. In: VandaeleJ (ed.) Translation and the (Re)location of Meaning, Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminars in Translation Studies 1994–1996. Luven: CETRA Publications, pp. 61–82.
55.
WangXRiffeD (2010) An exploration of sample sizes for content analysis of The New York Times web site. Web Journal of Mass Communication Research20. Available at: https://www.scripps.ohiou.edu/wjmcr/vol20/ (accessed 20 January 2017).
56.
WinklerM (2012) The Bloomberg Way: A Guide for Reporters and Editors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
57.
YooIS (2002) Quotation and realization of factuality. Kwanhun Journal43(1): 210–218.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
