This article introduces a journalistic intervention into routinized political ‘pseudo-events’ that can lull reporters and citizens into stultified complacency about public affairs while facilitating highly disciplined politicians’ cynical messaging. The intervention draws on non-representational theory, a style of research that aims to disrupt automatic routines and encourage people to recognize possibilities for change from moment to moment. The article details the author’s coverage of a routine political rally from a perspective untethered to normalized journalistic or political cues of importance, to generate affective and possibly unpredictable responses to the content.
AndersonBAshJ (2015) Atmospheric methods. In: VanniniP (ed.) Non-representational Methodologies: Re-envisioning Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 34–51.
2.
AndersonBHarrisonP (2010) The promise of non-representational theories. In: AndersonBHarrisonP (eds) Taking-Place: Non-Representational Theories and Geography. London: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 1–34.
BybeeC (1999) Can democracy survive in the post-factual age? A return to the Lippmann-Dewey debate about the politics of news. Journalism and Communication Monographs1(1): 27.
DewsburyJD (2010) Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In: DeLyserDHerbertSAitkenS, et al(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 321–335.
12.
DewsburyJDHarrisonPRoseM, et al (2002) Enacting geographies. Geoforum33(4): 437–440.
13.
FendlerL (2016) How is it possible to make a difference? Agency, actors, and affect as discourses of change in education research. In: SmeyersPDepaepeM (eds) Educational Research: Discourses of Change and Changes of Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 29–44.
14.
FendlerLSmeyersP (2015) Focusing on presentation instead of representation: Perspectives on representational and non-representational language-games for educational history and theory. Paedagogica Historica51(6): 691–701.
15.
FowlerR (1991) Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
16.
GeogheganHWoodyerT (2014) Cultural geography and enchantment: The affirmative constitution of geographical research. Journal of Cultural Geography31(2): 218–229.
PapacharissiZ (2014) Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
ParksP (2017) We know how to communicate with power. We just don’t do it. In: GeorgeC (ed.) Communicating with Power. International Communication Association Theme Book Series (pp. 233–255). New York: Peter Lang.
28.
RinehartRE (2010) Poetic sensibilities, humanities, and wonder: Toward an e/affective sociology of sport. Quest62(2): 184–201.
ThriftN (2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Routledge.
31.
TuchmanG (1978) Making News. New York: Free Press.
32.
VanniniP (2015) Non-representational research methodologies: An introduction. In: VanniniP (ed.) Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
33.
ZembylasM (2016) The contribution of non-representational theories in education: Some affective, ethical and political implications. Studies in Philosophy and Education. Epub ahead of print, 13September. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-016-9535-2
