Tinted revolutions in prismatic news: Ideological influences in Greater China’s reporting on the role of social media in the Arab Uprisings

Abstract

Social media is widely seen as playing a crucial role in the Arab Uprisings. This study compares news coverage in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan regarding social media in the Arab Uprisings. Content analysis of 162 news stories revealed that media in the three regions constructed their coverage within different frames, despite the events being geographically remote to the three Greater China regions and occurring in countries with which Greater China has little cultural, religious, ethnical, or economic connections. Overall, a clear pro-social-media pattern was found in Hong Kong and Taiwan media coverage, whereas in mainland China social media and the users involved in the Arab Uprisings were treated in the news in an obscured or unfavorable manner. Mainland China’s coverage was less likely to mention censorship of social media in the revolutions, whereas Hong Kong and Taiwan media frequently reported censorship and took a stance against it. Hong Kong and Taiwan media were also inclined to relate situations in the Arab Uprisings to mainland China. Such variations in the media coverage arguably are mainly due to ideological differences.

Keywords

Arab Uprisings censorship China Hong Kong news framing protests social media Taiwan

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhavan-Majid

Ramaprasad

(1998) Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO forum. Mass Communication and Society 1(3–4): 131–152.

BBC News (2012) China’s social networks hit by censorship, says study. BBC News. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17313793 (accessed 28 July 2016).

Ben Moussa

(2013) From Arab street to social movements: Retheorizing collective action and the role of social media in the Arab Spring. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 9(2): 47–68.

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 611–639.

Bennett

(1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40(2): 103–127.

Bennett

Segerberg

(2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 739–768.

Bennett

Lawrence

Livingston

(2006) None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication 56(3): 467–485.

Blumler

Gurevitch

(1995) Towards a comparative framework for political communication research. In: Blumler

Gurevitch

(eds) The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 59–72.

Bowe

Fahmy

Matthes

(2015) U.S. newspapers provide nuanced picture of Islam. Newspaper Research Journal 36(1): 42.

10.

Brown

Guskin

Mitchell

(2012) Arab-American media: Bringing news to a diverse community. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2012/11/28/arabamerican-media/

11.

Cambie

(2012) Lessons from the front line: The Arab Spring demonstrated the power of people and social media. Communication World 29(1): 28–32.

12.

Cheung

(2003) Self-censorship and the Struggle for Press Freedom in Hong Kong. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

13.

Cottle

(2008) Reporting demonstrations: The changing media politics of dissent. Media, Culture & Society 30(6): 853–872.

14.

Cheng

(2013) Framing the 2011 Egyptian revolution within ideological boundaries: One incident, three stories. International Communication Research Journal 48(3–4): 27–51.

15.

Eltantawy

Wiest

(2011) Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication 5: 1207–1224.

16.

Entman

(1991) Symposium framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication 41(4): 6–27.

17.

Entman

R. M.

(1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4), 51–58.

18.

Fahmy

(2010) Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette 72(8): 695–717.

19.

Freedomhouse.org. (2014) Freedom House. Available at: http://www.freedomhouse.org (accessed 28 July 2014).

20.

Friedland

Zhong

(1996) International television coverage of Beijing Spring 1989: A comparative approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs 156: 1–60.

21.

Gamson

Lasch

(1983) The political culture of social welfare policy. In: Shimon

Ephraim

(eds) Evaluating the Welfare State. New York: Academic Press, pp. 397–415.

22.

Gerbaudo

(2012) Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.

23.

Gitlin

(1980) The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

24.

Goffman

(1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

25.

Guo

Feng

(2012) Understanding support for Internet censorship in China: An elaboration of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Chinese Political Science 17(1): 33–52.

26.

Hachten

Scotton

(2007) The World News Prism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

27.

Hallin

Mancini

(2004) Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Hess

(2013) From the Arab Spring to the Chinese Winter: The institutional sources of authoritarian vulnerability and resilience in Egypt, Tunisia, and China. International Political Science Review 34(3): 254–272.

29.

Hille

(2013) China tightens Internet ID controls. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/7ab3e9d4-50d4-11e2-b287-00144feab49a (accessed 22 February 2013).

30.

Hong Kong Journalist Association (2014) Press freedom under siege. Available at: http://www.hkja.org.hk/site/Host/hkja/UserFiles/file/annual_report_2014_Final.pdf (accessed 22 March 2015).

31.

Howard

Hussain

(2013) Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

32.

Jiang

(2007) Ideological influences and news content variation in Chinese newspapers. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, San Francisco, CA, 24–28 May.

33.

Khamis

Vaughn

(2013) Cyberactivism in the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions: Potentials, limitations, overlaps and divergences. Journal of African Media Studies 5(1): 69–86.

34.

Kobland

Kwon

(1992) Influence of ideology in news reporting case study of New York Times’ coverage of student demonstrations in China and South Korea 1. Asian Journal of Communication 2(2): 64–77.

35.

Lasorsa

(1997) Media agenda setting and press performance: A social system approach for building theory. In: McCombs

Shaw

Weaver

(eds) Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 155–158.

36.

Levinson

(2012) New New Media. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

37.

Lim

(2012) Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication 62(2): 231–248.

38.

(1994) Press control in ‘New China’ and ‘Old China’. In: Lee

(ed.) China’s Media, Media’s China. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 147–161.

39.

MacKinnon

(2012) Consent of the Networked. New York: Basic Books.

40.

McQuail

(1992) Media Performance. London: SAGE.

41.

Merrill

Odell

(1983) Philosophy and Journalism. New York: Longman.

42.

Oliver

Johnston

(2005) What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. In: Noakes

Hank

(ed.) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 185–204.

43.

Pan

Kosicki

G. M.

(1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political communication 10(1), 55–75.

44.

Seymour-Ure

(1974) The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable.

45.

Snow

Benford

(2000) Clarifying the relationship between framing and ideology in the study of social movements: A comment on Oliver and Johnston. Mobilization 5(2): 55–60.

46.

Stevenson

(1994) Global Communication in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Longman.

47.

Tuchman

(1978) Making News. New York: Free Press.

48.

Van Dijk

(1998) Ideology. London: SAGE.

49.

Walgrave

Manssens

(2005) Mobilizing the White March: Media frames as alternatives to movement organizations. In: Noakes

Johnston

(eds) Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 113–140.

50.

(1994) Command communication: The politics of editorial formulation in the People’s Daily. The China Quarterly 137: 194.

51.

(2000) One head, many mouths: Diversifying press structures in reform China. In: Lee

(ed.) Power, Money and Media. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 45–67.

52.

Zhang

Fahmy

(2009) Color revolutions in colored lenses: A comparative analysis of US and Russian press coverage of political movements in Ukraine, Belarus and Uzbekistan. International Journal of Communication 3: 23.