Studies of informational media use have focused on individual platforms or pitted platforms against each other when investigating their connections to civic engagement. This study offers evidence, collected in a 2016 survey of US adults, of how civically engaged individuals consume various types of news content across multiple platforms. Results suggest that the best condition is the most varied one, wherein consumers get news on all six platforms studied. A breakdown of content categories finds that television viewers and those who pay attention to breaking news and crime are less civically engaged.
AlthausSLTewksburyD (2002) Agenda setting and the ‘new’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of The New York Times. Communication Research29(2): 180–207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002004
BeaudoinCE (2009) Exploring the association between news use and social capital: Evidence of variance by ethnicity and medium. Communication Research36(5): 611–636. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338905
4.
CampbellSWKwakN (2010) Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication60(3): 536–555. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x
5.
CampbellSWKwakN (2011) Mobile communication and civil society: Linking patterns and places of use to engagement with others in public. Human Communication Research37(2): 207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01399.x
DholakiaNReyesIBonoffJ (2015) Mobile media: From legato to staccato, isochronal consumptionscapes. Consumption Markets & Culture18: 10–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2014.899216
10.
DimmickJFeasterJCHoplamazianGJ (2010) News in the interstices: The niches of mobile media in space and time. New Media & Society13(1): 23–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810363452
11.
DunawayJPaulNSearlesKet al (2016) Does (Screen) size matter? News engagement on computers, tablets and smartphones. In: Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL, 8 April 2016.
12.
EdgerlyS (2015) Red media, blue media, and purple media: News repertoires in the colorful media landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media59(1): 1–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998220
13.
EntmanRM (2005) The nature and sources of news. In: Geneva Overholser and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (eds) Institutions of American Democracy: The Press. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 48–65.
14.
EvelandWPJr (2003) A ‘mix of attributes’ Approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication53(3): 395–410. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.x.
15.
EvelandWPJr (2004) The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication. 21: 177–193.
16.
EvelandWPJrDunwoodyS (2002) An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the web versus print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(1): 34–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_3
17.
FlemingKThorsonE (2008) Assessing the role of information-processing strategies in learning from local news media about sources of social capital. Mass Communication and Society11(4): 398–419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430801950643
18.
Gil de ZúñigaHGarcia-PerdomoVMcGregorSC (2015) What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication65(5): 793–815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12174
19.
Gil de ZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication17(3): 319–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083–6101.2012.01574.x
20.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication64(4): 612–634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
21.
Gil de ZúñigaHVeenstraAVragaEet al (2010) Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics7(1): 36–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903316742
22.
HardyBWJamiesonKH (2011) Clicking to learn during the 2008 presidential election: Why capturing channel switching matters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media55(4): 470–489. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.620669
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
25.
KimSJ (2016) A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behavior. New Media & Society18(3): 353–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543162
26.
KwakNCampbellSWChoiJet al (2011) Mobile communication and public affairs engagement in Korea: An examination of non-linear relationships between mobile phone use and engagement across age groups. Asian Journal of Communication. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2011.587016
27.
LambrechtATuckerC (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. Journal of Marketing Research50(5): 561–576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0503
28.
LaneRE (1959) Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe; Wilmington, IL: The Free Press.
29.
LeeHYangJ (2014) Political knowledge gaps among news consumers with different news media repertoires across multiple platforms. International Journal of Communication8. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2455/1087
30.
LewisJCushionS (2009) The thirst to be first: An analysis of breaking news stories and their impact on the quality of 24 hour news coverage in the UK. Journalism Practice3(3): 304–318. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780902798737
31.
McChesneyRWPickardV (2011) Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It. London: The New Press.
32.
McCombsM (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press and Blackwell. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0745623131
MolyneuxLogan (2018) Mobile news consumption: A habit of snacking. Digital Journalism6(5): 634–650.
35.
MorrisJSForgetteR (2007) News grazers, television news, political knowledge, and engagement. The International Journal of Press/politics12(1): 91–107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06297122
36.
NeumanWRBimberBHindmanM (2011) The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. Epub ahead of print May. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0002.
37.
NeumanWRJustMRCriglerAN (1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning (American Politics and Political Economy Series). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
NorrisP (1996) Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics29: 474–480.
39.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin Books.
40.
Patterson TE (2013) Informing the News. New York: Vintage.
41.
PriceVNirLCappellaJN (2006) Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory16(1): 47–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x
42.
PriorM (2003) Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication20(2): 149–171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211172
43.
PriorM (2005) News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science49(3): 577–592.
44.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45.
ReaganJ (1996) The ‘repertoire’; of information sources. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media40(1): 112–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364336
46.
ReinemannCStanyerJScherrSet al (2011) Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 221–239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427803
RojasHPuig-i-AbrilE (2009) Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication14(4): 902–927. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
49.
RubinAMPerseEM (1987) Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research14(1): 58–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014001004
50.
Ruston ScottW (2012) Calling ahead: Cinematic imaginations of mobile media’s critical affordances. In: Noah Arceneaux and Anandam Kavoor (eds) The Mobile Media Reader. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 23–39.
51.
SantanaALivingstoneRMChoYY (2013) Print readers recall more than do online readers. Newspaper Research Journal34(2): 78–92.
52.
SayreBBodeLShahDVet al (2010) Agenda setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California proposition 8 in social media, online news and conventional news. Policy & Internet2(2): 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1040
53.
ScheufeleDAShahDV (2000) Personality strength and social capital: The role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research27(2): 107–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002001
54.
ShahDV (1998) Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology19(3): 469–496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002001
55.
Singer JaneB (2005) The political J-blogger: ‘Normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism6(2): 173–198.
56.
TanejaHWebsterJGMalthouseECet al (2012) Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society14(6): 951–968. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811436146
57.
TewksburyDAlthausSL (2000) Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 457–479. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700301
58.
TewksburyDAJWeaverBDMaddex (2001) Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78: 533–554.
59.
Tien-TsungLLuWLeeTet al (2008) How newspaper readership affects political participation. Newspaper Research Journal29(3): 8–23.
60.
UslanerEM (1998) Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology19(3): 441–467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00113
61.
VerbaSNieNH (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row.
62.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politicsvol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
YangJGrabeME (2011) Knowledge acquisition gaps: A comparison of print versus online news sources. New Media & Society13(8): 1211–1227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811401708
ZhongZ-J (2014) Civic engagement among educated Chinese youth: The role of SNS (Social Networking Services), bonding and bridging social capital. Computers & Education75: 263–273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.005
68.
ZukinCKeeterSAndolinaMet al (2006) A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
