Journalism scholarship has routinely relied on the hierarchy of influences model for the conceptualization of research questions and implementation of studies. Heeding Shoemaker and Reese’s call for more ‘multi-level’ analysis, this study looks at environmental journalism as a space for a multi-level analysis. Through in-depth interviews, environmental reporters described their work routines and organizational roles. The findings from these descriptions suggest that the environmental journalistic space is influenced by the relationship between journalistic ideology, organizational structures, and individual work routines. Ideology serves as the basis for both organizational business models and individual beliefs. Together, these three components serve as foundational base that dictates the work routines of environmental reporters.
AgarwalSDBarthelML (2013) The friendly barbarians: Professional norms and work routines of online journalists in the United States. Journalism16: 376–391.
2.
AntillaL (2005) Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change15(4): 338–352.
3.
Attride-StirlingJ (2001) Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research1(3): 385–405.
4.
BoykoffMTBoykoffJM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum38(6): 1190–1204.
5.
BrüggemannMEngesserS (2014) Between consensus and denial: Climate journalists as interpretive community. Science Communication36(4): 399–427.
6.
BurnardP (1991) A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today11(6): 461–466.
7.
CarpentierN (2005) Identity, contingency and rigidity: The (counter-) hegemonic constructions of the identity of the media professional. Journalism6(2): 199–219.
8.
CarvajalMGarcía-AvilésJAGonzálezJL (2012) Crowdfunding and non-profit media: The emergence of new models for public interest journalism. Journalism Practice6(5–6): 638–647.
9.
CarvalhoA (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science16(2): 223–243.
10.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
11.
DunawayJLawrenceRG (2015) What predicts the game frame? Media ownership, electoral context, and campaign news. Political Communication32(1): 43–60.
12.
FahyDNisbetMC (2011) The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices. Journalism12(7): 778–793.
13.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE (2008) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 80–92.
14.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–90.
15.
GibsonTACraigRTHarperAC, et al. (2015) Covering global warming in dubious times: Environmental reporters in the new media ecosystem. Journalism17: 417–434.
16.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks (ed and trans. HoareQNowell-SmithG). New York: International Publishers.
17.
HellmuellerLCheemaSEZhangX (2017) The networks of global journalism: Global news construction through the collaboration of global news startups with freelancers. Journalism Studies18: 45–64.
18.
HoltonAE (2016) Intrapreneurial informants: An emergent role of freelance journalists. Journalism Practice10(7): 917–927.
KuhnKM (2016) The rise of the ‘gig economy’ and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology9(1): 157–162.
21.
LacySWildmanSSFicoF, et al. (2013) How radio news uses sources to cover local government news and factors affecting source use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(3): 457–477.
22.
LarrondoADomingoDErdalIJ, et al. (2016) Opportunities and limitations of newsroom convergence: A comparative study on European public service broadcasting organisations. Journalism Studies17(3): 277–300.
23.
LewisSC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
24.
MajorAMAtwoodLE (2004) Environmental risks in the news: Issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Understanding of Science13(3): 295–308.
25.
MorrellBForsythRLipworthW, et al. (2014) Rules of engagement: Journalists’ attitudes to industry influence in health news reporting. Journalism16: 596–614.
26.
OwenWF (1984) Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech70(3): 274–287.
27.
PapacharissiZ (2015) Toward new journalism(s): Affective news, hybridity, and liminal spaces. Journalism Studies16(1): 27–40.
28.
PetersHP (1995) The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: Co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society17(1): 31–48.
29.
ReeseSD (1990) The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the Wall Street Journal. Critical Studies in Media Communication7(4): 390–409.
30.
ReeseSD (2016) The new geography of journalism research: Levels and spaces. Digital Journalism4: 816–826.
31.
ReeseSDShoemakerPJ (2016) A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society19(4): 389–410.
32.
RosenthalG (1993) Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. In: JosselsonRHLieblichA (eds) The Narrative Study of Lives. London: SAGE, pp. 59–91.
33.
SchudsonM (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism2(2): 149–170.
34.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (1996) Mediating the Message. New York: Routledge.
35.
ShoemakerPJReeseSD (2013) Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
36.
SmithJ (2005) Dangerous news: Media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis25(6): 1471–1482.
37.
Society of Professional Journalists (2014) Letter urges President Obama to be more transparent. Available at: http://www.spj.org/news.asp?ref=1253 (accessed 11 November 2016).
38.
Society of Professional Journalists (2015) More than 50 journalism groups again urge President Obama to stop excessive controls on public information. Available at: http://www.spj.org/news.asp?REF=1368 (accessed 11 November 2016).
39.
TakahashiB (2011) Framing and sources: A study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE. Public Understanding of Science20(4): 543–557.
40.
TamelingKBroersmaM (2013) De-converging the newsroom: Strategies for newsroom change and their influence on journalism practice. International Communication Gazette75(1): 19–34.
41.
TandocECTakahashiB (2014) Playing a crusader role or just playing by the rules? Role conceptions and role inconsistencies among environmental journalists. Journalism15(7): 889–907.
42.
WeaverDHBeamRABrownleeBJ, et al. (2009) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: US News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. New York: Routledge.
