Media coverage plays an important role in the political career of politicians. The news media attention that politicians receive depends not only on political and socio-demographic variables, but also on their communication skills and personal characteristics such as physical appearance. This study explores the effect of facial attractiveness on the tone of the televised news coverage of Israeli parliament members. Results demonstrate a positive association between facial attractiveness and the overall coverage. In addition, each unit increase on the attractiveness scale was associated with an increase of 34 percent in the expected number of favorable appearances on TV news, but this association was slightly above the accepted 0.05 criterion for hypothesis testing. There was no significant effect of facial attractiveness on unfavorable or neutral coverage. These findings are interpreted. Implications for journalistic practices, political consultants, and access to the public sphere are discussed.
AllisonP (1999) Logistic Regression Using the SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
2.
AlmogS (2013) The beauty’s demand. The 7 Eye, 13October (in Hebrew).
3.
ArnoldRD (2004) Congress, the Press and Political Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BanducciSAKarpJAThrasherM, et al. (2008) Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections. Political Psychology29: 903–917.
5.
BenzurN (1993) Good Performance. Tel Aviv: Zemora-Bitan (in Hebrew).
6.
BerggrenNJordahlHPoutvarraP (2010) The looks of a winner: Beauty, gender and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics94(1–2): 8–15.
7.
BerkowitzD (1997) Refining the gatekeeping metaphor. In: BerkowitzD (ed.) The Social Meaning of News. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 81–94.
8.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television. New York: New Press.
9.
BrownL (1994) Looking good. Campaigns and Elections15(6): 40–42.
10.
BuchananB (1991) Electing a President: The Markle Commission Research on Campaign ‘88. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
11.
ChaikenS (1979) Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(8): 1387–1397.
12.
ClarkePEvansS (1983) Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
CookTE (1986) House members as newsmakers: The effects of televising Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly11: 203–226.
14.
CunninghamMRRobertsARBarbeeAP, et al. (1995) ‘Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours’: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68(2): 261–279.
15.
DionKBerscheidEWalsterE (1972) What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology24(3): 285–290.
16.
DownsACHarrisonSK (1985) Embarrassing age spots or just plain ugly? Physical attractiveness stereotyping as an instrument of sexism on American television commercials. Sex Roles13(1–2): 9–19.
17.
EaglyAHAshmoreRDMakhijaniMG, et al. (1991) What is beautiful is good, but …: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin110(1): 109–128.
18.
EfranMPattersonE (1974) Voter vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national debate. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science6: 352–356.
19.
EntmanRM (1991) Symposium framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narrative of the KAL and Iran air incident. Journal of Communication41(4): 51–58.
20.
EtcoffN (1999) Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty. New York: Doubleday.
21.
GaliliO (2004) The Tele-Politicians: New Political Leadership in the West and in Israel. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).
22.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research2: 64–91.
23.
GansHJ (1980) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage.
24.
GershonSA (2012) Press secretaries, journalists, and editors: Shaping local Congressional news coverage. Political Communication29(2): 160–183.
25.
GitlinT (1979) Prime time ideology: The hegemonic process in television entertainment. Social Problems26: 251–266.
26.
GrabeMABucyE (2009) Image Byte Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
GunnellJJCeciSJ (2010) When emotionality trumps reason: A study of individual processing style and juror bias. Behavioral Sciences & the Law28(6): 850–877.
28.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
HabermasJ ([1996] 2001) The public sphere. In: CaspiD (ed.) Pictures in the Head: Public Opinion and Democracy. Tel Aviv: Open University Press, pp. 57–62 (in Hebrew).
30.
HackshawAKirkwoodA (2011) Interpreting and reporting clinical trials with results of borderline statistical significance. BMJ343: d3340.
31.
HallCCGorenAChaikenS, et al. (2009) Shallow cues with deep effects: Trait judgments from faces and voting decisions. In: BorgidaEFedericoCMSullivanJL (eds) The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–99.
32.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
33.
JoslynMRCeccoliS (1996) Attentiveness to television news and opinion change in the fall 1992 presidential campaign. Political Behavior18(2): 141–170.
34.
LangloisJHKalakanisLAdamJ, et al. (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin126(3): 390–423.
35.
LangloisJHRoggmanLACaseyRJ, et al. (1987) Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype?Developmental Psychology23(3): 363–369.
36.
LensGSLawsonC (2011) Looking the part: Television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates’ appearance. American Journal of Political Science55: 574–589.
37.
LiebesT (1997) Talk shows – The new public sphere? In: CaspiD (ed.) Media and Democracy in Israel. Jerusalem: Van Lear Institute and Hakibutz Ha-Meuhad, pp. 141–152 (in Hebrew).
38.
LimorYMannR (1997) Journalism: Reporting, Writing and Editing. Tel Aviv: Open University Press (in Hebrew).
39.
McQuailD (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: SAGE.
40.
MannRLev-OnA (2012) The Israeli media in 2011: Agendas, uses and trends. Report, School of Communication, Ariel University Center of Samaria, Israel (in Hebrew).
41.
Markowitz-ElfassiD (2016) Looking good: Physical attractiveness as a predictor of news coverage of politicians. PhD Thesis, University of Haifa, Israel (in Hebrew).
42.
MidtboT (2011) Explaining media attention for Norwegian MPs: A new modelling approach. Scandinavian Political Studies34(3): 226–249.
43.
MobiusMMRosenblatTS (2006) Why beauty matters?The American Economic Review96: 222–235.
44.
NeubergerB (1997) Political Parties in Israel. Tel Aviv: Open University Press (in Hebrew).
45.
NitzMReichertTAuneAS, et al. (2007) All the news that’s fit to see? The sexualization of television news journalists as a promotional strategy. Journal of Promotion Management13(1–2): 13–33.
RhodesGYoshikawaSClarkA, et al. (2001) Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception30: 611–625.
48.
RimonZ (1992) Political Marketing. Tel Aviv: PR Publishing (in Hebrew).
49.
RosenbergSWMcCaffertyP (1987) The image and the vote manipulating voters’ preferences. The Public Opinion Quarterly51(1): 31–47.
50.
RosenbergSWBohanLMcCaffertyP, et al. (1986) The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference. American Journal of Political Science30(1): 108–127.
51.
SchoenbachKDe RidderJLaufE (2001) Politicians on TV news: Getting attention in Dutch and German election campaigns. European Journal of Political Research39(4): 519–531.
52.
SellersPJ (2000) Manipulating the message in the U.S. Congress. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5(1): 22–31.
53.
ShahDVWattsMDDomkeD, et al. (2002) News framing and cueing of issue regimes. Public Opinion Quarterly66: 339–370.
54.
SheaferT (2001) Charismatic skill and media legitimacy. Communication Research28(6): 711–736.
55.
SheaferT (2007) The quality of the members of the Knesset and media and political success: The power of charismatic communication skills. In: CaspiD (ed.) Media and Politics in Israel. Tel Aviv: Van Lear Institute and Hakibbutz Ha-Meuhad, pp. 91–109 (in Hebrew).
56.
SheaferT (2008) Charismatic communication skill, media legitimacy, and electoral success. Journal of Political Marketing7(1): 1–24.
57.
SheaferTWeimannGTsfatiY (2008) Campaigns in the holy land: The content and effects of election news coverage in Israel. In: StrombackJKaidLL (eds) The Handbook of Election News Coverage around the World. New York; London: Routledge, pp. 209–225.
58.
SmithSMMclntoshWDBazziniDG (1999) Are the beautiful good in Hollywood? An investigation of the beauty-and-goodness stereotype on film. Basic and Applied Social Psychology21(1): 69–80.
59.
SquireP (1988) Who gets national news coverage in the U.S. Senate?American Politics Quarterly16(2): 139–156.
60.
SullivanGMFeinnR (2012) Using effect size – Or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education4(3): 279–282.
61.
SurawskiMKOssoffEP (2006) The effects of physical and vocal attractiveness in impression formation of politicians. Current Psychology25(1): 15–27.
62.
TrafimowDMarksM (2015) Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology37: 1–2.
63.
TreshA (2009) Politicians in the media: Determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics14: 67–90.
64.
TsfatiYMarkowitz-ElfassiDWaismel-ManorI (2010) Exploring the association between Israeli legislators’ physical attractiveness and their television news coverage. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(2): 175–192.
65.
TuchmanG (1973) Making news by doing work: Routinizing the unexpected. American Journal of Sociology79: 110–131.
66.
Van Der WurffRSchoenbachK (2014) Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists: What does the audience expect from good journalism?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly91(3): 433–451.
67.
VinsonCD (2003) Local Media Coverage of Congress and Its Members. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
68.
VosD (2014) Which politicians pass the news gates and why? Explaining inconsistencies in research on news coverage of individual politicians. International Journal of Communication8: 2438–2461.
69.
Waismel-ManorITsfatiY (2011) Why do better-looking members of Congress receive more TV coverage?Political Communication28(4): 440–463.
70.
WassersteinRLazarN (2016) The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process and purpose. The American Statistician70(2): 129–133.
71.
WolfsfeldG (2011) Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication. New York: Routledge.
