Reader reaction to news of mass suffering: Assessing the influence of story form and emotional response

Abstract

Drawing from psychological research, the study examines how story form influences reader reaction to news accounts of mass violence in Africa. An online survey with embedded experimental conditions was administered to a US Internet panel (n = 638). Results show that how the story is told affects reader emotional response and, indirectly, charitable giving. Story personification had the strongest influence, followed by stories with photographic images. Use of statistical and mobilizing information had only a small effect on reader response. The straight news story – the predominant form of news reporting – evoked the weakest emotional response. The findings underscore that simply ‘reporting the news’ is often insufficient to arouse audience response. The reader needs empathetic connection, especially when dealing with large-scale distant suffering. Applying psychological principles to practical journalism, the study is intended to guide media practitioners and activists as they seek better ways to bring attention to the world’s most deplorable conditions.

Keywords

Emotion human rights news reporting social psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Baron

Kenny

(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182.

Bas

Grabe

(2015) Emotion-Provoking personalization of news: Informing citizens and closing the knowledge gap? Communication Research 42(2): 159–185.

Batson

Polycarpou

Harmon-Jones

et al . (1997) Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(1): 105–118.

Boltanski

(1999) Distant Suffering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Borer

(2012a) ‘Fresh, wet tears’: Shock media and human rights awareness campaigns. In: Borer

(ed.) Media, Mobilization, and Human Rights: Mediating Suffering. New York: Zed Books, pp. 143–180.

Borer

(2012b) Willful ignorance – News production, audience reception and responses to suffering. In: Borer

(ed.) Media, Mobilization, and Human Rights: Mediating Suffering. New York: Zed Books, pp. 1–41.

Brantner

Lobinger

Wetzstein

(2011) Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88: 523–540.

Brown

Minty

(2008) Media coverage and charitable giving after the 2004 tsunami. Southern Economic Journal 75(1): 9–25.

10.

Brown

Wong

(2009) Does the type of news coverage influence donations to disaster relief? Evidence from the 2008 cyclone in Myanmar (Working paper). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489909 (accessed 19 October 2013).

11.

Chouliaraki

(2006) The Spectatorship of Suffering. London: SAGE.

12.

Chouliaraki

(2008) The mediation of suffering and the vision of a cosmopolitan public. Television & New Media 9(5): 371–391.

13.

Chouliaraki

(2013) The Ironic Spectator. Cambridge: Polity Press.

14.

Curry

Hammonds

(2014) The power of solutions journalism. Solutions Journalism Network. Available at: http://solutionsjournalism.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ENP_SJN-report.pdf (accessed 30 July 2014).

15.

Domke

Perlmutter

Spratt

(2002) The primes of our times? An examination of the power of visual images. Journalism 3(2): 131–159.

16.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 51–58.

17.

European Journalism Observatory (EJO) (2015) Research: How Europe’s newspapers reported the migration crisis. Available at: http://en.ejo.ch/research/research-how-europes-newspapers-reported-the-migration-crisis (accessed 29 December 2015).

18.

Fetherstonhaugh

Slovic

Johnson

et al . (1997) Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14(3): 283–300.

19.

Friedrich

Barnes

Chapin

et al . (1999) Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8(3): 277–299.

20.

Gibson

(2000) Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77: 355–366.

21.

Goodman

Cryder

Cheema

(2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26(3): 213–224.

22.

Gross

D’Ambrosio

(2004) Framing emotional response. Political Psychology 25(1): 1–29.

23.

Haigh

Brubaker

Heresco

(2009) The impact of mood and story frame on information processing of news stories. Paper presented at the annual conference of the international communication association. May 21, Chicago.

24.

Kim

Cameron

(2001) Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research 38(6): 826–855.

25.

Kinnick

Krugman

Cameron

(1996) Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73: 687–706.

26.

Kogut

Ritov

(2005a) The ‘identified victim’ effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18: 157–167.

27.

Kogut

Ritov

(2005b) The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97(2): 106–116.

28.

Kristof

(2003) In Sudan, Seeing echoes of Darfur. New York Times, 17 February, p. SR11.

29.

Kristof

(2009) Nicholas Kristof’s advice for saving the world. Outside Online. Available at: http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/Nicholas-Kristof-s-Advice-for-Saving-the-World.html (accessed 17 October 2013).

30.

KushKush

(2013) New Strife in Darfur leaves many seeking refuge. New York Times, 24 May, p. A6.

31.

Kyriakidou

(2009) Imagining ourselves beyond the nation? Exploring cosmopolitanism in relation to media coverage of distant suffering. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 9(3): 481–496.

32.

Lecheler

Bos

Vliegenthart

(2015) The mediating role of emotions: News framing effects on opinions about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(4): 812–838.

33.

Lecheler

Schuck

ART

de Vreese

(2013) Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications 38(2): 189–209.

34.

Lemert

(1981) Does Mass Communication Change Public Opinion after All? Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.

35.

Lemert

Mitzman

Seither

et al . (1977) Journalists and mobilizing information. Journalism Quarterly 54: 721–726.

36.

Lippmann

([1922] 2004) Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. (Quoted from republished edition by Dover Publications).

37.

McGoldrick

Lynch

(2016) Audience responses to peace journalism: Merging results from a four-country research study. Journalism Studies 17(5): 628–646.

38.

Maier

(2015) Compassion fatigue and the elusive quest for journalistic impact: A content and reader-metrics analysis assessing audience response. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(3): 700–722.

39.

Maier

Mayorga

Slovic

(forthcoming). The affective gap: Response to news of humanitarian crisis differs by gender and age. Newspaper Research Journal Scheduled publication Summer 2017 38(3).

40.

Mason

Suri

(2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44(1): 1–23.

41.

Moeller

(1999) Four habits of international news reporting. Available at: http://www.frameworksinstitute.org/assets/files/PDF_GII/four_habits_of_news_reporting.pdf (accessed 11 April 2014).

42.

Murphy

Frank

Chatterjee

et al . (2013) Narrative versus nonnarrative: The role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communication 63: 116–137.

43.

Nabi

(2002) Anger, fear, uncertainty and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs 69(3): 204–216.

44.

Oliver

Dillard

Bae

et al . (2012) The effect of narrative on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89: 205–224.

45.

Pfau

Haigh

Fifrick

et al . (2006) The effects of print news photographs of the casualties of war. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83: 150–168.

46.

Powell

Boomgaarden

De Swert

et al . (2015) A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication 65(6): 997–1017.

47.

Power

(2002) A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York: HarperCollins.

48.

Preacher

Hayes

(2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891.

49.

Pruce

(2012) The spectacle of suffering and humanitarian intervention in Somalia. In: Borer

(ed.) Media, Mobilization, and Human Rights: Mediating Suffering. New York: Zed Books, pp. 216–239.

50.

Scheufele

(2009) Framing as theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 43(4): 103–122.

51.

Shen

Adhern

Baker

(2014) Stories that count: Influence of news narratives on issue attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91: 98–117.

52.

Slovic

(2007) If I look at the mass I shall never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making 2: 79–95. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1569098

53.

Slovic

Vastfjall

(2010) Affect, moral intuition and risk. Psychological Inquiry 21: 387–398.

54.

Slovic

Zionts

Woods

et al . (2013) Psychic numbing and mass atrocity. In: Shafir

(ed.) The Behavioral Foundations of Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 126–144.

55.

Small

Loewenstein

Slovic

(2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on the donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102: 143–153.

56.

Sobel

(1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect affects in structural equation models. In: Leinhart

(ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 290–312.

57.

Turner

(2007) Using emotion in risk communication: The anger activism model. Public Relations Review 33(2): 114–119.

58.

Vastfjall

Slovic

Mayorga

(2015) Pseudoinefficacy and the arithmetic of compassion. In: Slovic

Slovic

(eds) Numbers and Nerves: Information, Emotion, and Meaning in a World of Data. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press, pp. 42–52.

59.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2013) The strategic ritual of emotionality: A case study of Pulitzer Prize-winning articles. Journalism Studies 14(3): 305–320.

60.

Wanta

(1988) The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly 65: 107–111.

61.

Warren

(2015) The photos of the Syrian boy shook the world – But not for long. Poynter Mediawire. Available at: http://www.poynter.org/news/mediawire/385189/the-photos-of-the-syrian-boy-shook-the-world-but-not-for-long/ (accessed 29 December 2015).

62.

Whitehorn

(1989) The use of the media in the promotion of mental health. International Journal of Mental Health 18: 40–46.

63.

Zelizer

(2002) Finding aids to the past: Bearing personal witness to traumatic public events. Media, Culture & Society 24: 697–714.

64.

Zelizer

(2010) About to Die: How News Images Move the Public. New York: Oxford University Press.

65.

Zhong

(2011) Readers’ mood affect news information processing. Newspaper Research Journal 32(3): 52–65.