Learning from documents: Applying new theories of materiality to journalism

Abstract

This article briefly reviews theories of materiality emerging in communication technology studies and organizational communication and then suggests three ways that journalism scholars might apply these theories to studies of news production. How journalists work, how journalism is shaped within newsrooms, the ways the news industry is changing, and ultimately, the effects of digital transitions can all benefit from including a focus on the ‘objects of journalism’. First, objects, such as documents, help scholars describe the social settings where objects are found. Second, the objects of journalism help scholars uncover lines of authority, contexts of news routines, and richness and persistence of news practices. Third, studying the objects of journalism can help explain the persistence of so-called residual practices that might otherwise seem dysfunctional in digital news. Materiality theories can help journalism scholars explain the impact of the transition to digital news on the work and practices of journalists and the news industry as a whole.

Keywords

Materiality technology Science and Technology Studies ethnography theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashcraft

Kuhn

Cooren

(2009) Constitutional amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals 31: 1–64.

Cooren

(2004) Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization 11(3): 373–393.

Dossick

Anderson

Azari

. (2014) Messy talk in virtual teams: Achieving knowledge synthesis through shared visualizations. Journal of Management in Engineering. Available at: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000301

Dossick

Neff

(2011) Messy talk and clean technology: Communication, problem solving and collaboration using building information modeling. Engineering Project Organization Journal 1(2): 83–93.

Gitelman

(2014) Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Gupta

(2012) Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Hodder

(2012) Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118241912

Kaghan

Lounsbury

(2006) Artifacts, articulation work, and institutional residue. In: Rafaeli

Pratt

(eds) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 259–278.

Knorr Cetina

(1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Kuhn

Jackson

(2008) Accomplishing knowledge: A framework for investigating knowing in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly 21(4): 454–485.

11.

Latour

(1991) Technology is society made durable. In: Law

(ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, pp. 103–131.

12.

Leonardi

(2012) Car Crashes without Cars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Lievrouw

(2013) Materiality and media in communication and technology studies: An unfinished project. In: Gilespie

Boczkowski

Foot

(eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–52.

14.

Neff

Fiore-Silfvast

Dossick

(2010) A case study of the failure of digital media to cross knowledge boundaries in virtual construction. Information, Communication & Society 13(4): 556–573.

15.

Neff

Fiore-Silfvast

Dossick

(2014) Materiality: Challenges to communication theory. In: Lievrouw

(ed.) International Communication Association Theme Book 2013: Challenging Communication Research. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 209–224.

16.

Taylor

Van Every

(2000) The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.