This study utilizes ethnography to examine whether a digitally native news nonprofit, The St. Louis Beacon, practices a new form of public journalism, a movement within the journalism industry that diminished and eventually died in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Using McManus’ market theory for news production as a lens, the data showed that the Beacon practiced a slightly different form of public journalism. Therefore, because of that concept’s negative perception within the industry, this study dubs this new form of public service journalism. Public service journalism still primarily focuses on engagement, but does so without the negative connotations of public journalism and also while allowing the journalists to retain news judgment.
BeamRA (2003) Content differences between daily newspapers with strong and weak market orientations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80(2): 368–390.
7.
BirdSE (2009) The Anthropology of News & Journalism: Global Perspectives. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
8.
BlazierTFLemertJB (2000) Public journalism and changes in content of the Seattle Times. Newspaper Research Journal21(3): 69.
9.
CarpenterS (2008) How online citizen journalism publications and online newspapers utilize the objectivity standard and rely on external sources. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85(3): 531–548.
10.
CharityA (1995) Doing Public Journalism. New York: Guilford Press.
11.
ColemanRThorsonE (2002) The effects of news stories that put crime and violence into context: Testing the public health model of reporting. Journal of Health Communication7(5): 401–425.
12.
CorriganDH (1999) The Public Journalism Movement in America: Evangelists in the Newsroom. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
EmersonRFretzRShawL (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
FriedlandLA (2001) Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research28(4): 358–391.
16.
GadePJPerryEL (2003) Changing the newsroom culture: A four-year case study of organizational development at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80(2): 327–347.
17.
GansHJ (2004) Democracy and the News. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
GlasserTL (1999) The Idea of Public Journalism. New York: Guilford Press.
19.
HamelJDufourSFortinD (1993) Case Study Methods, vol. 32. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
KayeJQuinnS (2010) Funding Journalism in the Digital Age: Business Models, Strategies, Issues and Trends. New York: Peter Lang.
KovachBRosenstielT (2007) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press.
23.
LeeST (2001) Public journalism and non-elite actors and sources. Newspaper Research Journal22(3): 92.
24.
McChesneyRW (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
25.
McChesneyRW (2004) The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
26.
McCrackenGD (1988) The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
27.
McManusJH (1992) What kind of commodity is news. Communication Research19(6): 787–805.
28.
McManusJH (1994) Market-Driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
MainRSBairdCW (1981) Elements of Microeconomics. Austin, TX: Thompson Publishing.
30.
MarchionniDM (2013) Journalism-as-a-conversation: A concept explication. Communication Theory23(2): 131–147.
31.
MerrittD (1998) Public Journalism and Public Life: Why Telling the News Is Not Enough. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
MeyerP (1987) Ethical Journalism: A Guide for Students, Practitioners, and Consumers. New York: Longman.
33.
NeeRC (2013) Creative destruction: An exploratory study of how digitally native news nonprofits are innovating online journalism practices. International Journal on Media Management15(1): 3–22.
34.
NipJYM (2008) The last days of civic journalism. Journalism Practice2(2): 179–196.
35.
RosenJ (1994) Making things more public: On the political responsibility of the media intellectual. Critical Studies in Mass Communication11(4): 363–388.
36.
RosenJ (1996) Getting the Connections Right: Public Journalism and the Troubles in the Press. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
37.
RosenJ (1999) What Are Journalists for?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
RosenberryJJohnB (2010) Public Journalism 2.0: The Promise and Reality of a Citizen-Engaged Press. New York: Routledge.
39.
SchudsonM (1999) What public journalism knows about journalism but doesn’t know about ‘public’. In GlasserTL (ed.) The Idea of Public Journalism. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 118–133.
40.
SchudsonM (2003) The Sociology of News. New York: Norton.
41.
SchudsonM (2008) Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Malden, MA: Polity.
42.
SingerJ (2008) Ethnography of newsroom convergence. In: PatersonCADomingoD (eds) Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 157–170.
43.
SpradleyJP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44.
Van MaanenJ (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
WeissRS (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.
46.
WimmerRDDominickJR (2006) Mass Media Research: An Introduction, 8th ed.Belmont, CA: Thomson, Wadsworth.
47.
YinRK (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, vol. 5. Thousand Oak: CA: SAGE.
