In this essay, I use Law’s framework of heterogeneous engineering in tandem with insights from other sociologists of systems and scholarship on organizations, as a springboard to examine a number of digital artifacts assembled by the MSNBC Digital Network over the period 2007 through 2010 and to explore the manner in which a wide variety of values, interests, and concerns became ‘invested and contested’ in their design. Specifically, this article, the result of 5 weeks of interviewing and field observation at MSNBC.com, MSNBC TV, and National Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) News’ various online offices, explores the backstories of two seemingly mundane interfaces used by NBC News’ Web properties during that period, both of which are revealed to be particularly dynamic, heterogeneous, contingent, and consequential.
ChamberlainD (2010) Television interfaces. Journal of Popular Film and Television38: 84–88.
7.
ChildJMcGrathRG (2001) Organizations unfettered. The Academy of Management Journal44: 1135–1148.
8.
CoorenF (2000) The Organizing Property of Communication. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
9.
DeuzeM (2007) Media Work. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
FrancoVPiirtoRHuHY. (1995) Anatomy of a flame. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine14: 12–21.
11.
GalisonP (1997) Image and Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
12.
GirardMStarkD (2002) Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new media projects. Environment & Planning A34: 1927–1949.
13.
GrabherG (2002) The project ecology of advertising. Regional Studies36: 245–262.
14.
GreimasAJ (1987) On Meaning (trans. CollinsPJPFH). London: Frances Pinter.
15.
HermidaAThurmanN (2008) A clash of cultures. Journalism Practice2: 343–356.
16.
HughesTP (1987) The evolutions of large technological systems. In: BijkerWEHughesTPPinchTJ (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 51–82.
17.
HughesTP (1998) Rescuing Prometheus. New York: Pantheon Books.
18.
KelloggKCOrlikowskiWJYatesJ (2006) Life in the trading zone. Organization Science17: 22–44.
19.
KitturASuhBPendletonBA. (2007) He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. Paper presented at the annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 28 April.
20.
LatourB (1990) Drawing things together. In: LynchMWoolgarS (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 19–68.
21.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. London: Oxford University Press.
22.
LawJ (1987) Technology and heterogeneous engineering. In: BijkerWEHughesTPPinchTJ (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 111–134.
23.
LawJ (2002) Aircraft Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
NeffGStarkD (2004) Permanently beta. In: HowardPNJonesS (eds) Society Online. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 173–188.
25.
NissenbaumH (2011) From preemption to circumvention. Berkeley Technology Law Journal26: 1367–1386.
26.
PickeringA (1995) The Mangle of Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
27.
PinchTJBijkerWE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts. Social Studies of Science14: 399–441.
28.
StarSLGriesemerJ (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects. Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
29.
StarkD (1999) Heterarchy. In: ClippingerJH (ed.) The Biology of Business. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 153–179.
