Have the nature of printed news stories changed in competition with new media? Our content analysis of Norway’s largest morning newspaper Aftenposten in four time cuts between 1950 and 2008 revealed that the length of news stories had increased until 2008 when the newspaper had changed to the tabloid format with a mixture of both brief and lengthy articles. News stories tended to have broader time frames in more recent years. The frequency of simpler forms of news stories like reports of meetings and social events had diminished considerably. In the last 20 years, journalists have also become more visible in the text. We will look at these findings against a historical background.
AllernS (2001) Nyhetsverdier: Om markedsorientering og journalistikk i norske aviser [News Values: Attention to the Market and Journalism in Norwegian Newspapers]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.
2.
AllernS (2002) Journalistic and commercial news values. Nordicom Review23(1–2): 137–152.
3.
AllernS (2011) Fjernsynsvalgkampen. Program, deltakere og maktkamp 1961–2009 [Election Campaigns. Programming, Participants and the Power Game 1961–2009]. Oslo: Pax.
4.
BaldastyGJ (1992) The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
BarnhurstKG (2005) News ideology in the twentieth century. In: HøyerSPöttkerH (eds) Diffusion of the News Paradigm 1850–2000. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 239–262.
6.
BarnhurstKGMutzDC (1997) American newspapers and the decline in event-centered reporting. Journal of Communication47(4): 27–53.
7.
BarnhurstKGNeroneJ (2001) The Form of News: A History. New York: Guildford Press.
8.
ChalabyJK (1996a) Journalism as an Anglo-American invention: A comparison of the development of French and Anglo-American journalism, l830s–1920s. European Journal of Communication11(3): 303–326.
9.
ChalabyJK (1996b) Twenty years of contrast: The French and British press during the inter-war period. Archives Européennes de Sociologie37(1): 143–159.
10.
DahlHFBastiansenHG (1999) Over til Oslo. NRK som monopol 1945–1981 [The Norwegian Broadcasting Monopoly 1945–1981]. Oslo: Cappelen.
11.
DeFleurMJ (1970) Theories of Mass Communication, 2nd edn.New York: David McKay.
12.
DonsbachWKlettB (1993) Subjective objectivity. How journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession. Gazette51: 53–83.
13.
EsserF (1999a) ‘Tablodization’ of the news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication14(3): 291–324.
14.
EsserF (1999b) Zwischen eigener Tradition und angelsächsischem Vorbild. Die Auswirkungen der anglo-amerikanischen Reeducation-Bemühungen auf den deutschen Journalismus. In: WilkeJ (ed.) Massenmedien und Zeitgeschichte. Konstanz: UVK-Medien, pp. 664–675.
15.
EsserFUmbrichtA (2013) Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism14(8): 1008–1023.
16.
FentonJ (1988) All the Wrong Places: Adrift in Politics of the Pacific Rim. New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press.
17.
HallinDCManciniP (2004a) Americanization, globalization, and secularization: Understanding the convergence of media systems and political communication. In: EsserFBarbaraP (eds) Comparing Political Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–38.
18.
HallinDCManciniP (2004b) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HelstadKAlnæsÅRasmussenT. (2012) Pressenormers bidrag til journalistikkens selvstendiggjøring [The contribution of the professional codes of ethics to the autonomy of journalists]. Norsk Medietidsskrift19(2): 142–147.
20.
HerskedalLM (2007) Aftenpostens økonomijournalistikk 1970–2000 [Economy journalism in Aftenposten 1970–2000]. Master Thesis, Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Oslo (Thesis for the degree of Cand. Polit.).
21.
HøyerS (1968) The political economy of the Norwegian press. Scandinavian Political Studies3: 85–143.
22.
HøyerS (2013) Perspectives on journalism history. Paper to the history section for the IAMCR Conference in Dublin, 25–29 June.
23.
HøyerSNonseidJ (2005) The half-hearted modernization of Norwegian journalism 1908–1940. In: HøyerSPöttkerH (eds) Diffusion of the News Paradigm 1850–2000. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 123–136.
24.
KaplanL (2002) Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity 1865–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KöcherR (1986) Bloodhounds or missionaries: Role definitions of German and British journalists. European Journal of Communication1(1): 43–64.
26.
KolstrupS (2005) Telling the news: Danish newspapers 1873.1941/2000. In: HøyerSPöttkerH (eds) Diffusion of the News Paradigm 1850–2000. Göteborg: Nordicom, pp. 105–122.
27.
LengauerGEsserFBerganzaR (2011) Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 179–201.
28.
LindstedtI (1998) ‘Till de unga, till dem som ämna bliva tidningsmän’. Handböcker i journalistik [Textbooks in Journalism]. Göteborg: Institutionen för journalistik och masskommunikation.
29.
NorlandA (2011) Medier, makt og millioner. Schibsteds historie 1934–2011 [Media, Power and Millions. The History of Schibsted 1934–2011]. Oslo: Scibsted.
30.
RoksvoldT (ed.) (1993) Sport i avis: 7 analyser av norsk sportsjournalistikk [Sport in the Press]. Fredrikstad: Institutt for Journalistikk.
31.
RoksvoldT (2005) Var avisspråket bedre før? En metodetriangulært studie av normendringer i norsk avisspråk på 1900-tallet [Was the language in newspapers better in earlier times? A study of changing norms in language in the 19th cnetury]. PhD Thesis, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo (Acta Humaniora: 224).
32.
SchudsonM (1978) Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
33.
SchudsonM (1982) The politics of narrative form: The emergence of news conventions in print and television. Daedalus3(4): 97–112.
34.
SchudsonM (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism2(2): 149–170.
35.
ShawDL (1967) News bias and the telegraph: A study of historical change. Journalism Quarterly44(1): 3–31.
36.
ShawDL (1968) The nature of campaign news in the Wisconsin press l852–l9l6. Journalism Quarterly45(2): 326–329.
37.
SmytheTC (2002) The diffusion of the urban daily, 1850–1900. Journalism History28(2): 73–84.
38.
SteeleCABarnhurstKG (1996) The journalism of opinion: Network coverage in US presidential campaigns, 1968–1988. Critical Studies in Mass Communication13(3): 187–209.
39.
StensaasHS (1986–1987) Development of the objectivity ethic in US daily newspapers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics2(1): 50–60.
40.
ThomsenN (1972) Dagbladkonkurrencen 1870–1970 [Newspaper Competition in Denmark 1870–1970]. Copenhagen: Gads.
41.
TommilaPSalokangasR (2001) Tidningar för alla. Den finländska pressens historia [The History of the Finnish Press]. Göteborg: Nordicom.
WesterståhlJJohanssonF (1985) Bilden av Sverige. Studier av nyheter og nyhetsideologier i TV, radio och dagspress [Studies of News and News Ideologies in Swedish TV, Radio and Press]. Stockholm: Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle.
44.
WilkeJ (2007) Belated modernization. Form and style in German journalism 1880–1980. In: BroersmaM (ed.) Form and Style in Journalism. European Newspapers and the Representation of News 1880–2005. Leuven: Peeters: pp. 47–60.
