This study examined how The New York Times and The Times (London) framed the liberation war of Bangladesh. This study looked comprehensively at the framing, the tones, and sources of news in the newspapers. The results suggest that both newspapers used three frames most frequently: military-conflict frame, prognostic frame, and human-interest frame. The findings also show that both newspapers published news stories with more neutral tones than with positive and negative tones. The New York Times and The Times (London) relied mostly on official sources as their primary sources.
AdaySCluveriusJLivingstonS (2005) As goes the statue, so goes the war: The emergence of the victory frame in television coverage of the Iraq war. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(3): 314–331.
2.
AllanSZelizerB (2004) Rules of engagement: Journalism and war. In: AllanSZelizerB (eds) Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime. London: Routledge, pp. 3–21.
AlthausSL (2003) When news norms collide, follow the lead: New evidence for press independence. Political Communication20: 381–414.
5.
AltheideDL (1985) Impact of format and ideology on TV news coverage of Iran. Journalism Quarterly62(1–2): 346–351.
6.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–125.
7.
BiswasJ (1984) US-Bangladesh Relations: A Study of the Political and Economic Development During 1971–81. Columbia, MO: South Asia Book.
8.
BovitzGLDruckmanJNLupiaA (2002) When can a news organization lead public opinion? Ideology versus market forces in decisions to make news. Public Choice113: 127–155.
9.
CarruthersSL (2000) The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
CooperSD (2006) Watching the Watchdog: Bloggers as the Fifth Estate. Washington, DC: Marquette Books.
12.
DimitrovaDVStrombackJ (2005) Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq war in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United Stated. International Communication Gazette67(5): 399–417.
13.
DowningJ (2009) Iraq, Afghanistan and the future of U.S. journalism. Paper presented to the colloquium marking 5th anniversary of the Global Media Research Center (GMRC), Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, 19–21 March (unpublished).
14.
EntmanRM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication41(4): 6–27.
15.
EntmanRM (2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication20: 415–432.
16.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
17.
GoffmanE (1986) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
18.
HackettRA (1985) A hierarchy of access: Aspects of source bias in Canadian TV news. Journalism Quarterly62(2): 256–277.
19.
HermanESChomskyN (1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
HiebertRE (1999) Mass media as weapons of modern warfare. In: HiebertRE (ed.) Impact of Mass Media: Current Issues. New York: Longman, pp. 327–334.
21.
IsmailABerkowitzD (2009) Terrorism meets press system: The New York Times and China Daily before and after 9/11. Global Media Journal: Mediterranean Edition4(1): 15–28.
22.
JahanR (1995) Genocide in Bangladesh. In: TottenSParsonsWSCharnyIW (eds) Genocide in the Twentieth Century: Critical Essays and Eyewitness Accounts. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., pp. 371–402.
23.
KissingerH (1979) White House Years. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
24.
McCombsM (2005) The agenda-setting function of the press. In: OverholserGJamiesonKH (eds) Institutions of American Democracy: The Press. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 156–168.
25.
MamoonM (2002) Foreword. In: AhmedR (ed.) Media and the Liberation War of Bangladesh, vol. 1. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Center for Bangladesh Studies, pp. 1–5.
NelsonTEClawsonRAOxleyZM (1997) Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review91(3): 567–583.
28.
NoujaimJ (Director) (2004) Control Room (Documentary film). New York: Magnolia Pictures.
29.
NovakJJ (1993) Bangladesh: Reflections on the Water. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
30.
PintakLGingesJ (2008) The mission of Arab journalism: Creating change in a time of turmoil. International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 193–227.
31.
ReeseSD (2003) Prologue-framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In: ReeseSDGandyOHGrantAE (eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of Social World. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 7–32.
32.
ReeseSD (2007) The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication57(1): 1–7.
33.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
34.
ScheufeleDA (2000) Agenda setting, priming and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society3(2–3): 297–316.
35.
TumberHWebsterF (2006) Journalists Under Fire: Information War and Journalistic Practice. London: Sage.
36.
WheelerNJ (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
ZelizerB (1993) Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication10(3): 219–237.
