Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study provides a snapshot of the hierarchy-of-influences model in the new media environment through examining the effects of audience web metrics on editors. Surveying 318 gatekeepers, the study found that audience metrics influence editors in gatekeeping. Editors’ likelihood to monitor web metrics is affected by their journalism training. Gatekeepers who attach the importance of high readership to economic benefits are more likely to have different news decisions based on web metrics. The study suggests a revision of the hierarchy-of-influences model with more emphasis being placed on the role of the audience.

Keywords

Web metrics audience gatekeepers hierarchy of influences online newsroom

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aitken

Power

Dwyer

(2008) A very low response rate in an online survey of medical practitioners. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 32(3): 288–289.

Anderson

(2011) Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism 12(5): 550–566.

Andrews

Nonnecke

Preece

(2003) Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16(2): 185–210.

Baek

Holton

Harp

. (2011) The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 27(6): 2243–2248.

Baresch

Knight

Harp

. (2011) Friends who choose your news: An analysis of content links on Facebook. In: the ISOJ: the official research journal of international symposium on online journalism, Austin, TX.

Baruch

Holtom

(2008) Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations 61(8): 1139–1160.

Benbunan-Fich

Fich

(2004) Effects of web traffic announcements on firm value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8(4): 161–181.

Boczkowski

(2004) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Boczkowski

Peer

(2011) The choice gap: The divergent online news preferences of journalists and consumers. Journal of Communication 61(5): 857–876.

10.

Boorstin

(1961) The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Harper & Row.

11.

Bucy

(2004) Second generation net news: Interactivity and information accessibility in the online environment. International Journal on Media Management 6(1–2): 102–113.

12.

Cassidy

(2008) Outside influences: Extramedia forces and the newsworthiness conceptions of online newspaper journalists. First Monday 13(1) (accessed 8 July 2012).

13.

Chung

(2008) Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3): 658–679.

14.

Chung

Yoo

(2008) Audience motivations for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper. Mass Communication and Society 11(4): 375–397.

15.

Cox

(2010) The changing role of the gatekeeper with online news. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Kansas, Lawrence.

16.

Dillman

(2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.

17.

Domingo

(2008) Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3): 680–704.

18.

Gabszewicz

Laussel

Sonnac

(2002) Press advertising and the political differentiation of newspapers. Journal of Public Economic Theory 4(3): 317–334.

19.

Gans

(1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.

20.

Gibbs

Ellision

Heino

(2006) Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research 33(2): 152–177.

21.

Gieber

(1960) How the “gatekeepers” view local civil liberties news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 37(2): 199–205.

22.

Herscovitz

(2004) Brazilian journalists’ perceptions of media roles, ethics and foreign influences on Brazilian journalism. Journalism Studies 5(1): 71–86.

23.

Hoffman

(2006) Is Internet content different after all? A content analysis of mobilizing information in online and print newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83(1): 58–76.

24.

Keeter

Miller

Kohut

. (2000) Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2): 125–148.

25.

Kirchhoff

(2010) The U.S. Newspaper Industry in Transition. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

26.

Kperogi

(2011) Cooperation with the corporation? CNN and the hegemonic cooptation of citizen journalism through iReport. com. New Media & Society 13(2): 314–329.

27.

Lee

Lewis

(2012) Audience preference and editorial judgment: A study of time-lagged influence in online news. In: the international symposium of online journalism, Austin, TX, 20–21 April.

28.

Lewis

(2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society 15(6): 836–866.

29.

Lewis

Kaufhold

Lasorsa

(2010) Thinking about citizen journalism. Journalism Practice 4(2): 163–179.

30.

Lowrey

Woo

(2010) The news organization in uncertain times: Business or institution? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 87(1): 41–61.

31.

MacGregor

(2007) Tracking the online audience. Journalism Studies 8(2): 280–298.

32.

McKenzie

Lowrey

Hays

. (2011) Listening to news audiences: The impact of community structure and economic factors. Mass Communication & Society 14(3): 375–395.

33.

Meyer

(2011) Highlights from the 2011 journalists engagement survey. Available at: http://www.rjionline.org/news/highlights-2011-journalists-engagement-survey (accessed 10 July 2012).

34.

Napoli

(2010) Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.

35.

Perez-Pena

(2008) New York Times plans to cut 100 newsroom jobs, The New York Times, 14 February. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/business/media/14cnd-times.html?_r=0 (accessed 12 August 2012).

36.

Peters

(2010) Some newspapers, tracking readers online, shift coverage, The New York Times, 5 September. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/06/business/media/06track.html?_r=1 (accessed 18 November 2012).

37.

Pew Project For Excellence in Journalism (2010a). Understanding the participatory news consumer: News gets personal, social, and participatory. Avaliable at: http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/news_gets_personal_social_and_participatory (accessed 22 July 2012).

38.

Pew Project For Excellence in Journalism (2010b). State of news media 2011. Available at: http://stateofthemedia.org/2010/overview-3/key-findings/ (accessed 5 August 2012).

39.

Pew Project For Excellence in Journalism (2012). State of news media 2012. Available at: http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/overview-4/major-trends/ (accessed 28 November 2012).

40.

Reese

(2011). Journalism research and the hierarchy of influences model: A global perspective. Brazilian Journalism Research 3(2): 29–42.

41.

Rowe

(2005) Broadcast News Writing for Professionals. Oak Park, IL: Marion Street Press.

42.

Schultz

(1999) Interactive options in online journalism: A content analysis of 100 US newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(1). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/schultz.html.

43.

Schultz

(2002) Does education matter? Characteristics of journalists who went to graduate school. Journalism 3(2): 223–238.

44.

Seelye

(2006) Washington Post to cut 80 newsroom jobs. The New York Times, 11 March. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/11/business/media/11post.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0 (accessed 16 July 2012).

45.

Shoemaker

Johnson

Seo

. (2011) Readers as gatekeepers of online news: Brazil, China, and the United States. Brazilian Journalism Research 6(1): 55–77.

46.

Shoemaker

Reese

(1991) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. White Plains, NY: Longman.

47.

Shoemaker

Reese

(1996) Mediating the Message. New York: Longman.

48.

Shoemaker

Vos

Reese

(2008) Journalists as gatekeepers. In: Wahl-Jorgensen

Hanitzsch

(eds) Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.73–87.

49.

Singer

(2003) Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism 4(2): 139–163.

50.

Singer

(2006) Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co-production of content in campaign 2004. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83(2): 265–280.

51.

Singer

(2011) Crowd control: Collaborative gatekeeping in a shared media space. In: the Association for Education in Journalism and mass communications annual conference, St. Louis. 10–13 August.

52.

Sylvie

Huang

(2008) Value systems and decision-making styles of newspaper front-line editors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85(1): 61–82.

53.

Weaver

Randall

Brownlee

. (2007) The American Journalist in the 21st Century: U.S. News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

54.

White

(1950) The gatekeeper: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly 27(4): 383–390.

55.

Wigley

Meirick

(2008) Interactive media and sports journalists: The impact of interactive media on sports journalists. Journal of Sports Media 3(1): 1–25.

The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References