‘Shadow publics’ in the news coverage of socio-political issues

Abstract

Coverage of contentious socio-political issues in the news media often involves the creation of ‘shadow publics’ that facilitate journalistic framing strategies. These publics are not easily identifiable but exert significant persuasive power by virtue of the authority ascribed to them. This article explores how the media create and legitimize certain shadow publics which then go on to influence public policy. The findings of the article come out of an examination of the extensive newspaper coverage of two highly debated issues – immigration and genetic modification – in New Zealand between 1998 and 2002. Although the coverage of the two issues was dramatically different, it was apparent that particular sections of the population were given greater voice over others in newspapers via the seemingly neutral yet strongly opinionated and influential shadow publics.

Keywords

Framing genetic modification immigration journalism neoliberalism New Zealand shadow publics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Asen

Brouwer

(eds) (2001) Introduction: Reconfigurations of the public sphere. In: Asen

Brouwer

(eds) Counterpublics and the State. Albany: SUNY Press, 1–32.

Barber

(2000) Careful look at call for trials ban while Royal Commission sitting. New Zealand Herald, 20 January.

Bell

(2003) GM ban lifted to a mixed chorus. Dominion Post, 29 October.

Beston

(2000) Shopping around on GE issue. New Zealand Herald, 26 December.

Birss

(2002) Hot numbers. The Press, 7 September.

Blackwell

L-A

(2011) Reviewing the Change: A Comparative Historical Analysis on Immigration Control Policy Change within New Zealand. MA Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

Brownie

(2002) Immigration. The Press, 9 November.

Calhoun

(1999) Nationalism, political community and the representation of society: Or, why feeling at home is not a substitute for public space. European Journal of Social Theory 2(2): 217–231.

10.

Calhoun

(2002) Imagining solidarity: Cosmopolitanism, constitutional patriotism, and the public sphere. Public Culture 14(1): 147–171.

11.

Carragee

Roefs

(2004) The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication 54: 214–233.

12.

Chong

Druckman

(2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.

13.

Dahlgren

Sparks

(eds) (1991) Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.

14.

Dayan

(2001) The peculiar public of television. Media, Culture & Society 23(6): 743–765.

15.

Dekker

(2001) Scarves and slippers. Evening Post, 22 September.

16.

Dewey

(1927) The Public and its Problems. New York: Holt.

17.

Dominion (2001) Serbian rapist wins deportation appeal. 11 January.

18.

Downing

(2000) Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Dyer

(1988) White. Screen 29(4): 44–64.

20.

Easton

(1997) The Commercialisation of New Zealand. Auckland: University of Auckland Press.

21.

Entman

(1997) Manufacturing discord: Media in the affirmative action debate. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2(4): 32–51.

22.

Entman

(2003) Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication 20: 415–432.

23.

Evening Post (2001a) Rapist will not be deported. 10 January.

24.

Evening Post (2001b) Expert slams greenies. 26 July.

25.

Evening Post (2002) Government obligations run wider than to refugees. 11 April.

26.

Fairclough

(1995) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

27.

Fallow

(2001) Hidden costs of tax purity. New Zealand Herald, 10 May.

28.

Feldstein

(2007) Dummies and ventriloquists. Journalism 8(5): 543–553.

29.

Fraser

(1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26: 56–80.

30.

Frosh

Wolfsfeld

(2007) ImagiNation: News discourse, nationhood and civil society. Media, Culture & Society 29(1): 105–129.

31.

Gee

(1999) Alert out in far North for illegal immigrants. New Zealand Herald, 30 June.

32.

Goldberg

(2009) The Threat of Race: Reflections on Neoliberalism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

33.

Gregory

(2001) Rapist wins fight over deportation. New Zealand Herald, 10 January.

34.

Greif

(ed.) (1995) Immigration and National Identity in New Zealand: One People, Two Peoples, Many Peoples? Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.

35.

Grunwald

Rupar

(2009) Journalism curiosity and storytelling frame: A comparative study of Australian and Danish newspapers. Journalism Practice 3(4): 392–403.

36.

Haas

Steiner

(2001) Public journalism as a journalism of publics: Implications of the Habermas-Fraser debate for public journalism. Journalism 2(2): 123–147.

37.

Habermas

(1991) The Structural Formation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

38.

Hage

(1998) White Nation: Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Society. Annadale, NSW: Pluto.

39.

Hall

Stevens

Meleis

(1994) Marginalization: A guiding concept for valuing diversity in nursing knowledge development. Advances in Nursing Science 16(1): 23–41.

40.

Hall

(1995) The whites of their eyes: Racist ideologies and the media. In: Dines

Humes

(eds) Gender, Race, and Class in Media. London: Thousand Oaks: Sage, 18–22.

41.

Hall

(1997) The spectacle of the ‘other’. In: Hall

(ed.) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage, 223–290.

42.

Herman

Chomsky

(2002) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.

43.

Hoby

(1999) Diverse yes, but enthusiasm for New Zealand unites immigrants. The Press, 4 June.

44.

Kelsey

(1997) The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment? Auckland: Auckland University Press.

45.

Klein

Byerley

McEachern

(2009) Counterframing public dissent: An analysis of anti-war coverage in the US media. Critical Studies in Media Communication 26(4): 331–350.

46.

(1998) Boundary politics in the public sphere: Openness, secrecy and leak. Sociological Theory 16(2): 172–192.

47.

Kurian

Munshi

(2006) Tense borders: Culture, identity, and anxiety in New Zealand’s interweaving discourses of immigration and genetic modification. Cultural Politics 2(3): 359–380.

48.

Lentin

Titley

(2011) The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.

49.

Lewis

(2001) Constructing Public Opinion. New York: Columbia University Press.

50.

Lippmann

(1925) The Phantom Public. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

51.

Mair

(1998) A matter of genes. The Press, 4 June.

52.

Manning

(2001) News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.

53.

Martin

(2000) Illegal immigrants could be in SI. The Press, 14 March.

54.

Michelle

(2007) Human clones talk about their lives: Media representations of assisted reproductive and biogenetic technologies. Media, Culture & Society 29(4): 639–663.

55.

Mole

(2005) New survey show Kiwis’ growing opposition to GM food production. New Zealand Energy and Environment, 24 August. Available at: http://www.nzenergy-environment.co.nz/EEBW/050824EEBW.htm

56.

Morgan

(1999) NZ’s loss if couple ousted, say supporters. Dominion, 2 December.

57.

Mules

(1998) Media publics and the transnational public sphere. Critical Arts 12(1): 24–44.

58.

Munshi

(1998) Media, politics, and the Asianisation of a polarised immigration debate in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Communication 25(1): 97–110.

59.

Munshi

Kurian

(2009) Migrants, genes, and socio-scientific phobias: Charting the fear of the ‘Third World’ tag in discourses of development. In: Bhavnani

K-K

Foran

Kurian

Munshi

(eds) On the Edges of Development: Cultural Interventions. New York: Routledge, 94–109.

60.

Negt

Kluge

(1993[1972]) Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

61.

Nisbet

Brossard

Kroepsch

(2003) Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(2): 36–70.

62.

Pan

Kosicki

(1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10(1): 55–75.

63.

Porto

(2007) Frame diversity and citizen competence towards a critical approach to news quality. Critical Studies in Media Communication 24(4): 303–321.

64.

Riverton

(2002) Immigration. Southland Times, 25 November.

65.

Samson

(2000) No guarantees from gene food giants. Dominion, 17 October.

66.

Scanlon

(2001) Officials struggling to win illegal immigrant battle. Dominion, 10 December.

67.

Sell

(2001) Land of hope. Waikato Times, 14 April.

68.

Small

(2002) English test to cut Asian migrants. New Zealand Herald, 20 November.

69.

Southland Times (2002) AgResearch application has ethical implications. 17 May.

70.

Spratt

(2005) New Zealand faces up to a much more diverse future. New Zealand Herald, 22 May.

71.

Sunday Star-Times (2002) Voters blinded with science. 7 July.

72.

Talbot

(2002) Labour shortage holds back growth. Dominion Post, 2 December.

73.

Taylor

(2001) Business applauds deeper talent pool from immigration. New Zealand Herald, 15 October.

74.

Vasas

(2005) Examining the margins. Advances in Nursing Science 28(3): 194–202.

75.

Waikato Times (2001) Deportation avoided. 10 January.

76.

Warner

(2002) Publics and counter publics. Public Culture 14(1): 49–90.

77.

Weir

(1999) Banking chief warns against complacency. Dominion, 3 August.

78.

Wilcox

(2003) Cultural context and the convention of science journalism: Drama and contradiction in media coverage of biological ideas about sexuality. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20(3): 225–247.

79.

Young

(2004) Migration patterns ‘whitening’. New Zealand Herald, 9 July.