‘People will die because of the BBC’: British newspaper reaction to the BBC Gaza appeal decision

Abstract

This study examines the responses of British national newspaper editorials and op-eds to the BBC’s January 2009 decision not to air an appeal by the Disasters Emergency Committee to raise money for refugees in the Gaza region. We find six prominent themes in national newspaper discourse: (1) the BBC demonstrating blatant disregard for human life; (2) the BBC ‘taking sides’; (3) raising questions as to whether the BBC was ever impartial; (4) the decision situated as part of a broader narrative of failure; (5) the decision running counter to the BBC’s public service mission; and (6) broader questions raised over the BBC’s future. Our findings indicate that the BBC’s role in British life is under continued debate. This has implications for the organization in a time when its role is under scrutiny and threat from commercial forces.

Keywords

BBC charity appeals Gaza impartiality public broadcasting public service

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderman

(2009) For and against: Was the BBC right? The Guardian, 26 January.

Altheide

(1987) Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology 10(1): 65–77.

Altheide

(1996) Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Austin

(2009) BBC policy lacks clarity and charity. Daily Mirror, 31 January.

Barnett

(2002) Will a crisis in journalism provoke a crisis in democracy? Political Quarterly 73(4): 400–408.

BBC (2004) The future of the BBC – building public value. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/policies/text/bpv.html

BBC (2005) BBC Annual Report 2004/2005. Available at: http://www.bbcgovernorsarchive.co.uk/annreport/BBC_news_review.pdf

BBC (2006) Governors’ statement and BBC management’s response to the independent panel report on coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Available at: http://www.bbcgovernorsarchive.co.uk/docs/reviews/israelipalestiniangovernors_statement.pdf

BBC Trust (2007) From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel: Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/18_06_07impartialitybbc.pdf

10.

Bell

(2009) This absurd BBC decision is part of a wider malaise. Guardian, 27 January.

11.

Berkowitz

(2000) Doing double duty: Paradigm repair and the Princess Diana what-a-story. Journalism 1(2): 125–141.

12.

Born

(2005) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke, and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Vintage.

13.

Brown

(1996) Economics, public service broadcasting, and social values. Journal of Media Economics 9(1): 3–15.

14.

Carey

(1989) Communications as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

15.

Carroll

(2009) The BBC claims broadcasting an appeal by aid agencies for humanitarian relief in Gaza would compromise its ‘reputation for impartiality’. Daily Mirror, 27 January.

16.

Chalaby

(1998) The Invention of Journalism. London: Macmillan.

17.

Christians

Ferre

Fackler

(1993) Good News: Social Ethics and the Press. New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Clout

(2009) 50 MPs join call for BBC to show Gaza aid appeal. The Express, 26 January.

19.

Coughlin

(2009) The Gaza aid appeal has no place on television news. Daily Telegraph, 26 January.

20.

Curran

Iyengar

Lund

Salovaara-Moring

(2009) Media system, public knowledge, and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication 24(1): 5–26.

21.

Cushion

Lewis

(2009) Towards a ‘Foxification’ of 24-hour news channels in Britain? An analysis of market-driven and publicly funded news coverage. Journalism 10(2): 131–153.

22.

Daily Mail (2009a) Gaza, bias, and the BBC. 26 January.

23.

Daily Mail (2009b) The BBC is a floundering giant with no moral sense. 5 February.

24.

Daily Mirror (2009) BBC boss Mark Thompson blunders again with Gaza appeal snub. 26 January.

25.

Daily Telegraph (2009) Gaza’s children need our charity – the BBC must help. 24 January.

26.

Daley

(2009) BBC is right to ban Gaza appeal, but for the wrong reasons. Sunday Telegraph, 25 January.

27.

Enli

(2008) Redefining public service broadcasting: Multi-platform participation. Convergence 14(1): 105–120.

28.

Financial Times (2009) Unbalanced Beeb – BBC’s refusal of Gaza appeal shows a lack of backbone. 27 January.

29.

Fitzsimmons

(2009) BBC: Sorry state of affairs. Guardian, 9 February.

30.

Franklin

(2001) British Television Policy: A Reader. London: Routledge.

31.

Gardam

(2008) The purpose of plurality. In: Gardam

Levy

DAL

(eds) The Price of Plurality: Choice, Diversity, and Broadcasting Institutions in the Digital Age. Oxford: OFCOM, pp.11–22.

32.

Glover

(2009) The BBC is now run by a narrow sect, blind to the good sense and values of those it serves. Daily Mail, 5 February.

33.

The Guardian (2009) Error of judgement: BBC and Gaza. 27 January.

34.

Hampton

(2008) The ‘objectivity’ ideal and its limitations in 20th-century British journalism. Journalism Studies 9(4): 477–493.

35.

Hargreaves

(2003) Truth or Dare? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36.

Harvey

(2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

37.

Hindman

(2003) The Princess and the paparazzi: Blame, responsibility, and the media’s role in the death of Diana. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80(3): 666–688.

38.

Hindman

(2005) Jayson Blair, The New York Times, and paradigm repair. Journal of Communication 55(2): 225–241.

39.

Hundal

(2009) It would help if the BBC admitted making a mistake. The Times, 27 January.

40.

Hyde

(2009) Apologies, people of Gaza – the BBC is a bit jumpy lately. Guardian, 24 January.

41.

Khan

(2009) Williams urges BBC to show Gaza aid appeal. Daily Telegraph, 26 January.

42.

Kieran

(1998) Objectivity, impartiality, and good journalism. In: Kieran

(ed.) Media Ethics. London: Routledge, pp.23–36.

43.

Lindlof

Taylor

(2002) Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

44.

Llewelyn

(2009) This cowardly decision betrays the values the corporation stands for. The Observer, 25 January.

45.

McNair

(2003) An Introduction to Political Communication, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.

46.

Miller

(1993) Official sources and ‘primary definition’: The case of Northern Ireland. Media, Culture & Society 15(3): 385–406.

47.

Montgomery

(2006) Broadcast news, the live ‘two-way’ and the case of Andrew Gilligan. Media, Culture & Society 28(2): 233–259.

48.

Moore

(2009) Face it Jacqui, kids WANT to get ‘out of it’. Daily Mail, 2 February.

49.

Morning Star (2009) Blood on the BBC’s hands. 25 January.

50.

Murdoch

(2009) The absence of trust. Available at: http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Media/documents/2009/08/28/JamesMurdochMacTaggartLecture.pdf

51.

Nashashibi

(2009) The corporation’s choice: To show or not to show? Guardian, 27 January.

52.

News of the World (2009) Another offensive episode from the BBC. 8 February.

53.

The Observer (2009) Why the BBC is wrong over the Gaza appeal. 25 January.

54.

Patten

(2009) Writing cheques for Gaza is easy. Politics is the tricky bit. Guardian, 27 January.

55.

Phillips

(2009) The BBC won’t show the Gaza appeal to protect its impartiality, but does anyone really believe it’s impartial? Daily Mail, 26 January.

56.

Philo

Berry

(2004) Bad News from Israel. London: Pluto Press.

57.

Pitcher

(2009a) The BBC’s moral cowardice is disgusting. Daily Telegraph, 25 January.

58.

Pitcher

(2009b) Carol Thatcher golliwog furore: Is there anyone sensible living on Planet Beeb? Daily Telegraph, 5 February.

59.

Porter

(1995) Public service broadcasting and European regulation. Mediaforum 7(3): 30–34.

60.

Preston

(2009) Jonathan Ross: Has he learned his lesson? Daily Telegraph, 24 January.

61.

Rachman

(2009) Bias and the BBC. Financial Times, 27 January.

62.

Reade

(2009) Tony Benn lords it over peers accused of taking backhanders. Daily Mirror, 29 January.

63.

Reith

(1924) Broadcast over Britain. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

64.

Robinson

(2009) James Murdoch hits out at BBC and regulators at Edinburgh TV festival. The Guardian, 28 August. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/28/james-murdoch-bbc-mactaggart-edinburgh-tv-festival

65.

Rosenfeld

(2000) The op-ed page: A step to a better democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5(3): 7–11.

66.

Sabbagh

(2009) Why the BBC was right not to show the Gaza charity appeal. The Times, 30 January.

67.

Thompson

(2009) The BBC tries to be impartial over Israel – and look what happens. Sunday Telegraph, 25 January.

68.

Thompson

(2006) Delivering public value: The BBC and public sector reform. New Statesman, 16 October.

69.

Thompson

(2009) BBC and the Gaza appeal. BBC Online, 24 January. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/01/bbc_and_the_gaza_appeal.html

70.

The Times (2009) The Gaza appeal: The BBC’s decision to refuse the charity request is mistaken. 26 January.

71.

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2004) Playground of the pundits or voice of the people? Comparing British and Danish opinion pages. Journalism Studies 5(1): 59–70.

72.

Waterhouse

(2009) Books still furnish a busy brain. Mail on Sunday, 25 January.

73.

Westerstahl

(1983) Objective news reporting. Communication Research 10: 403–424.

74.

Whale

(1972) Journalism and Government. London: Macmillan.

75.

Zelizer

(1993) Journalists as interpretive communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10(3): 219–237.