This study examines the affordances that journalistic science blogging offers at the boundaries between science communicators, researchers, non-scientists, and other readers. Taking a framework of boundary phenomena, it examines, as a case study, the blog Not Exactly Rocket Science and in particular two posts that spawned a collaboration between a scientist and a farmer. Two existing boundary phenomena, boundary objects and boundary organizations, are examined as possible models for understanding the interactions facilitated by this science blog. These existing phenomena are argued to not adequately account for and describe the interactions between people and information facilitated by the case study posts. To better understand science blogging boundaries, a new category of boundary phenomenon – the boundary layer – is proposed.
AndersonJD (2005) Ludwig Pradtl’s boundary layer. Physics Today58(2): 42–48.
2.
BucchiM (1998) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication. New York: Routledge.
3.
BucchiM (2008) Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge.
4.
BurchellK (2007) Boundary work, associative argumentation and switching in the advocacy of agricultural biotechnology. Science as Culture16: 49–70.
5.
CarrAWilkinsonR (2005) Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society and Natural Resources18: 255–265.
FoxNJ (2011) Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology45(1): 70–85.
11.
GerringJ (2004) What is a case study and what is it good for?American Political Science Review98: 341–354.
12.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48: 781–795.
13.
GierynTF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GregoryJMillerS (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. London: Plenum.
15.
GustonD (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology and Human Values26: 399–408.
16.
HermidaA (2008) The BBC goes blogging: Is Auntie finally listening?Paper presented at the 9th International Symposium on Online Journalism, April, Austin TX, USA.
17.
HermidaA (2009) The blogging BBC: Journalism blogs at ‘the world’s most trusted new organisation’. Journalism Practice3(3): 1–17.
18.
IncroperaFPDeWittDP (1996) Introduction to Heat Transfer, 3rd edn.New York: John Wiley.
StarSL (1988) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: HuhnsMGasserL (eds) Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: Kaufman.
29.
StarSL (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values35: 601–617.
30.
StarSLGriesemerJ (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
