Introduction

Allan S (2009) Making science newsworthy: Exploring the conventions of science journalism. In: Holliman R Whitelegg E Scanlon E Smidt S Thomas J (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allgaier J (2010) Networking expertise: Discursive coalitions and collaborative networks of experts in a public creationism controversy in the UK. Public Understanding of Science. Available at: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/11/16/0963662510383385

Bauer MW Bucchi M (eds) (2007) Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations. London: Routledge.

Beddington J (2011) We need both scepticism and consensus. New Scientist, 18 February. Available at: http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/thesword/2011/02/science-scepticism-and-consens.html

Boyce T Lewis J (eds) (2009) Climate Change and the Media. New York: Peter Lang.

Brumfiel G (2009) Science journalism: Supplanting the old media? Nature 458: 274–278.

Chalmers M (2007) A revolution in bits. Physics World 20(1): 18–21.

Condit CM (2004) Science reporting to the public. Canadian Medical Association Journal 170(9): 1415–1416.

Davies N (2008) Flat Earth News. London: Chatto and Windus.

Diethelm P McKee M (2009) Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? European Journal of Public Health 19(1): 2–4.

Dwyer J Hood L (2011) Beddington goes to war against bad science. Research Fortnight, 14 February.

Francl M (2011) Blogging on the sidelines. Nature Chemistry 3: 183–184.

Geller G Bernhardt B Gardner M Rodgers J Holtzman N (2005) Scientists’ and science writers’ experiences reporting genetic discoveries: Toward an ethic of trust in science journalism. Genetics in Medicine 7(3): 198–205.

Gething L (2003) ‘Them and us’: Scientists and the media – attitudes and experiences. South African Medical Journal 93(3): 197–201.

Goldacre B (2009) Bad Science. London: Harper Perennial.

Hansen A (2011) Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette 73(1–2): 7–25.

Holliman R Whitelegg E Scanlon E Smidt S Thomas J (eds) (2009) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hermida A (2010) Revitalizing science journalism for a digital age. In: Kennedy D Overholser G (eds) Science and the Media. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Jensen E (2010) Between credulity and scepticism: Envisaging the fourth estate in 21st-century science journalism. Media, Culture & Society 32(4): 615–630.

Kiernan V (2006) Embargoed Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Kitzinger J Williams C (2005) Forecasting science futures: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate. Social Science & Medicine 61: 731–740.

Ladle R Jepso P Whittaker R (2005) Scientists and the media: The struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 30(3): 231–240.

Lester L (2010) Media and Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mandavilli A (2011) Trial by Twitter. Nature 469(7330): 286–287.

Nature (2009) Survey of Science Journalists in Different National Contexts. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/c38kp6

Nature (2010) Editorial: Science scorned. Nature 467(7312): 133.

Nielsen KH Carsten RK Dahlgaard J (2007) Scientists and science communication: A Danish survey. Journal of Science Communication 6(1): 1–12.

Nisbet M Mooney C (2007) Framing science. Science 316: 56.

Obama B (2009) Inaugural address: Transcript. New York Times, 20 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/us/politics/20text-obama.html

Petersen A Anderson A Allan S Wilkinson C (2009) Opening the black box: Scientists’ views on the role of the news media in the nanotechnology debate. Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 512–530.

Priest SH (2009) Reinterpreting the audiences for media messages about science. In: Holliman R Whitelegg E Scanlon E Smidt S Thomas J (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Riesch H (2010) Changing news: Re-adjusting science studies to online newspapers. Public Understanding of Science. Available at: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/08/23/0963662510376342.abstract

RIN (2010) If You Build It, Will They Come? How Researchers Perceive and Use Web 2.0. London: The Research Information Network. Available at: http://www.rin.ac.uk/

Russell C (2009) Science journalism goes global. Science 324: 1491.

Trench B (2009) Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the internet. In: Holliman R Whitelegg E Scanlon E Smidt S Thomas J (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilcox SA (2003) Cultural context and the conventions of science journalism: Drama and contradiction in media coverage of biological ideas about sexuality. Critical Studies in Media Communication 20(3): 225–247.

Williams A Clifford S (2009) Mapping the Field: Specialist Science News Journalism in the UK National Media. Cardiff: Cardiff University School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies.