The mechanisms of personalization deployed by news websites are resulting in an increasing number of editorial decisions being taken by computer algorithms — many of which are under the control of external companies — and by end users. Despite its prevalence, personalization has yet to be addressed fully by the journalism studies literature. This study defines personalization as a distinct form of interactivity and classifies its explicit and implicit forms. Using this taxonomy, it surveys the use of personalization at 11 national news websites in the UK and USA. Research interviews bring a qualitative dimension to the analysis, acknowledging the influence that institutional contexts and journalists’ attitudes have on the adoption of technology. The study shows how: personalization informs debates on news consumption, content diversity, and the economic context for journalism; and how it challenges the continuing relevance of established theories of journalistic gate-keeping.
Aggregate Knowledge (n.d.) Overview. Available at: http://www.aggregateknowledge.com/about.html
2.
Barzilai-Nahon K. ( 2008) Toward a Theory of Network Gatekeeping: A Framework for Exploring Information Control. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology59(9): 1493-1512.
3.
Barzilai-Nahon K. ( 2009) ‘Gatekeeping Revisited: A Critical Review’ , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology43: 433-78.
4.
Becker LB and Vlad T. ( 2009) News organizations and routines. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 59-72.
5.
Boaden H. ( 2007) Reorganising BBC News. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/10/reorganising_bbc_news_1.html?ref=klasshop.com
6.
Boczkowski P. ( 2004) Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Bucy E. ( 2004) Second Generation Net news: Interactivity and information accessibility in the online environment. International Journal on Media Management6( 1&2): 102-13.
8.
Chung DS and Yoo C. ( 2008) Audience motivation for using interactive features: Distinguishing use of different types of interactivity on an online newspaper . Mass Communication and Society11(4): 375-97.
9.
Daylife (n.d.) About Daylife. Available at: http://corp.daylife.com/about
10.
Deuze M. ( 2003) The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society5(2): 203-30.
11.
Gauch S., Speretta M., Chandramouli A., and Micarelli A. ( 2007) User profiles for personalized information access . In: Kobsa A, Brusilovsky P, and Nejdl W (eds) The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag , 54-89.
12.
Gerpott TJ and Wanke H. ( 2004) Interactivity potentials and usage of German press-title web sites: An empirical investigation. Journal of Media Economics17(4): 241-60.
13.
Gunter B. ( 2003) News and the Net. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
Harrison J. ( 2006) News. Abingdon: Routledge.
15.
Hoggart R. ( 1976) Forward. In: The Glasgow University Media Group (ed.) Bad News. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, ix-xiv.
16.
Jensen JF ( 1998) ‘Interactivity’. Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review19(1): 185-204.
17.
McNair B. ( 2009) News and Journalism in the UK. London : Routledge.
18.
Meikle G. ( 2009) Interpreting News. Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan.
19.
Mitchelstein E. and PJ Boczkowski(2009) Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism10(5): 562-86.
20.
Morley D. ( 1993) Active audience theory: Pendulums and pitfalls . Journal of Communication43(4): 13-19.
21.
Negroponte N. ( 1995) Being Digital. Vintage Publishing .
22.
Neuman WR ( 1991) The Future of the Mass Audience. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
23.
New York Times (2009) A note about My Times. Available at: http://my.nytimes.com/?_r=1[registrationrequired]
24.
Perez JC ( 2009) Yahoo aims at customization with new home page . Available at: http://www.info-world.com/t/funding-and-finances/yahoo-aims-customization-new-home-page-119
25.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press ( 2008) Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey . Available at: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/444.pdf
26.
Quandt T. and Singer JB ( 2009) Convergence and cross-platform content production . In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 130-44.
27.
Shiels M. ( 2009) Google Turns Page on News Content. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8256054.stm
28.
Singer J. ( 2003) Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism4(2): 139-63.
29.
Skelton R. ( 1991) A Devious Dictionary. Vancouver : Cacanadadada Press.
30.
Spyridou PL and Veglis A. ( 2008) Exploring structural interactivity in online newspapers: A look at the Greek Web landscape. First Monday13(5). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2164/1960
31.
Stromer-Galley J. ( 2004) Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process . The Information Society20(5): 391-94.
32.
Thompson M. ( 2005) Transforming the BBC. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/speeches/stories/thompson_staff.shtml
33.
Thurman N. and Hermida A. ( 2010) Gotcha: How newsroom norms are shaping participatory journalism online. In: Monaghan G and Tunney S (eds) Web Journalism: A New Form of Citizenship?Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press, 46-62.
34.
Weiss R. ( 1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.
35.
Williams K. ( 2003) Understanding Media Theory. London : Hodder Education.
36.
Zelizer B. ( 2009) Journalism and the Academy. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 29-41.
